Brief
A collection of practical Claude Code skills — multi-LLM evaluation, domain management, planning, writing quality, and pair-session patterns. MIT licensed.
npx -y skills add eprouveze/claude-skills --skill briefAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Project-aware session briefing. Loads project-intel, decisions log, deferred actions, and known-issues files before any work, so Claude starts with project context instead of cold. Use at session start, before any task, or when the user says "/brief", "brief me", "what should I know", "catch me up".
SKILL.md
7.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
/brief — Project-Aware Session Briefing
Build a synthesized briefing of the project so Claude knows what the project IS, how it works, and what to avoid before doing anything else.
Optional delegation mode
If the project has .claude/llm-mode.json and its mode is "multi", delegate the heavy
doc reading to a cheaper CLI (Antigravity CLI — agy, previously the Gemini CLI — is a
common pick). Only pull the result back to synthesize. If the file is absent or mode is
"single", run the standard path. If the delegated call fails, fall back to standard
silently.
Example delegated call:
# `agy` (Antigravity CLI) replaces the sunset Gemini CLI on consumer plans as of
# 2026-06-18; enterprise plans may still use the legacy `gemini` binary. The model
# identifier (`gemini-3-pro`) is unchanged.
#
# Note: piping into `agy` already provides stdin, so the `</dev/null` gotcha that
# applies to bare `agy -p "..."` doesn't bite here. For non-piped scripted calls
# elsewhere, always write `agy -p "<prompt>" </dev/null`.
echo "You are a research analyst. I am about to work on: $TASK.
Review the attached documentation and output a Pre-Task Briefing:
1. WATCH OUT — past mistakes, forbidden patterns, known issues
2. HARD CONSTRAINTS — non-negotiable rules
3. PROJECT CONTEXT — what this project IS, tech stack, capabilities
4. STRATEGIC CONTEXT — goals, audience, positioning
5. RELATED WORK — existing content, features, or code that overlaps
6. RECOMMENDATIONS — specific suggestions
Cite source file paths. Omit empty sections." | \
agy -m gemini-3-pro -p "" @.claude/project-intel.md @docs/ > .brief-temp.md
Standard load order
Execute these reads in parallel where possible:
Tier 1 — always load
- Project intel —
.claude/project-intel.mdin the project directory. If it's missing, flag it: "No project-intel.md — operating with limited project context." - Failure atlas / known issues — whatever the project uses (
docs/memory/failure-atlas.md,docs/known-issues.md, etc.). Skip silently if absent. - CLAUDE.md — project-level
.claude/CLAUDE.mdorCLAUDE.mdfor conventions. - Feedback files — anything loaded via a memory index in the project.
Tier 2 — project history
- Decisions log —
docs/decisions/log.md(last 10 entries). - Recent session topics —
docs/sessions/topics/*.mdif the project uses that pattern. - Deferred actions —
docs/deferred-actions.md.
Tier 3 — cross-project (only when the workspace contains multiple projects)
- Capabilities index — what each sibling project can do.
- Topic graph — shared topics, decisions, and capability pointers.
- Last-session marker — the timestamp of the previous session so the "since last session" section is accurate.
Project detection
- If CWD is inside a known project directory → that's the project.
- If CWD is a workspace root with multiple projects → ask which one.
- If the user mentioned a project name → load that one.
- Otherwise → ask.
Scoring (for ranking briefing items)
score(item) = utility × recency × relevance × (1 − suppression)
| Item type | Utility |
|---|---|
| Mistake relevant to today's work | 1.0 |
| Decision made since last session | 0.9 |
| Deferred action due within 48h | 0.85 |
| Low-confidence topic for current project | 0.7 |
| Cross-project capability opportunity | 0.5 |
| Recency | Weight |
|---|---|
| Today | 1.0 |
| This week | 0.8 |
| This month | 0.5 |
| Older | 0.2 |
| Relevance | Weight |
|---|---|
| Current project | 1.0 |
| Any active project | 0.5 |
| Universal | 0.3 |
| Suppression (spaced repetition) | Weight |
|---|---|
| Surfaced last session | 0.8 |
| 2 sessions ago | 0.4 |
| 3+ sessions ago | 0.0 |
The point of suppression is to avoid repeating the same warning every session.
Output format
Generate a synthesized narrative. Do not dump raw file contents.
## Session briefing — YYYY-MM-DD
### Project: <name>
<one-line summary from project-intel: what it is, tech stack, current state>
### Mistakes to avoid
- <trigger> → <prevention rule> (from: <evidence>)
### Since last session
- <decision/change>: <what> because <why>
### Expiring soon
- <deferred action> due <date>: <description>
- Flag OVERDUE items prominently
### Confidence gaps
- <topic>: <what's uncertain and how to verify>
### Cross-project opportunities
- <project A> could use <capability> from <project B>
### Context
- <top 3 relevant session topic summaries>
Return at most 10 items total across all sections. Omit empty sections. Always include the project-intel one-liner — that is how the briefing proves it knows the project.
Documentation discovery (when project-intel is missing)
If .claude/project-intel.md doesn't exist:
- Glob
docs/**/*.mdandcontent/**/*.md. - Read
CLAUDE.mdfor conventions. - Check
docs/feedback/,docs/content-review/,docs/plans/. - Check
.claude/skills/to learn what the project can do. - Flag the user: "This project is missing project-intel.md — consider creating one."
Known gotchas
- Dumping raw file contents instead of synthesizing. The whole point of /brief is to pre-digest the project state. If the output looks like cat'd files, the skill failed.
- Forgetting suppression. Without the spaced-repetition step, every session shows the same three warnings. Users tune the briefing out fast.
- Loading too much. Capping at 10 items keeps the briefing scannable. Anything longer competes with the actual task for attention.
Anti-patterns
- Generating a briefing without first checking that the project files exist. An empty briefing is more useful than a hallucinated one — flag the missing files.
- Treating every project the same. The Tier-2 file names are conventions; not every project has them. Skip what's missing instead of inventing it.
Validated patterns
- Briefings under 200 words get read. Briefings over 500 words get skimmed.
- The "since last session" section is the most-used part. Spend extra care making the diff accurate.
Self-improvement
This skill ships with a lightweight feedback loop. Adopt or ignore — the skill works without it.
Trigger a review when:
- The user explicitly corrects a briefing item (strongest signal — log immediately; 2–3 corrections on the same theme → promote to body).
- A golden case that previously passed starts failing.
- A novel input category recurs across sessions.
learnings.mdcrosses ~100 bullets (consolidation time).- The skill mis-triggers or fails to trigger.
- The Claude model version changes.
Consolidation pass (5–10 min, weekly or threshold-driven):
- Each entry gets one fate: apply, capture, or dismiss.
- Apply = merge into Known gotchas / Anti-patterns / Validated patterns.
- Capture = leave in
learnings.mdfor now. - Dismiss = delete.
- Bump
last-consolidated:in frontmatter.