agentsclimarketplace

Pm mean

Skill endorphin-ai/claude-code-teams/mean-team/.claude/skills/pm-mean

🍕 One Pizza Team [AI Agents Team ] | Claude Code Agent Squads

Install
npx -y skills add endorphin-ai/claude-code-teams --skill pm-mean

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Product management for MEAN stack apps. Use when writing PRDs, defining features, acceptance criteria, or reviewing deliverables for MongoDB + Express + React + Node.js projects.

SKILL.md

2.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

PM Mean

Purpose

Write PRDs (Product Requirements Documents) for MEAN stack web applications and validate deliverables against acceptance criteria. This skill bridges user requests and developer execution.

Key Patterns

PRD Structure

Every PRD must include:

  1. Overview — What the app does, who it's for, core value proposition
  2. Features — Numbered list (F1, F2...), each with: description, user story, acceptance criteria
  3. Data Model Summary — Key entities and relationships (high-level, not full schema)
  4. API Summary — Key endpoints grouped by resource (high-level, not full contracts)
  5. UI Summary — Key pages/views and user flows (high-level, not full component tree)
  6. Technical Constraints — Auth method (JWT for MEAN), deployment target, performance requirements
  7. Priorities — MoSCoW (Must/Should/Could/Won't) for features

User Story Format

As a [role], I want to [action] so that [benefit]. Acceptance Criteria:

  • Given [context], when [action], then [result]

Acceptance Review Pattern

When reviewing deliverables (final pipeline phase):

  1. Read the original PRD
  2. For each feature: check if acceptance criteria are met
  3. Produce a pass/fail verdict per feature
  4. Flag missing features, partial implementations, and deviations

Conventions

  • Write for developers, not stakeholders — be specific, not vague
  • Every feature MUST have testable acceptance criteria (Given/When/Then)
  • Use REST resource naming: plural nouns, lowercase (/api/users, /api/posts)
  • Specify auth requirements per feature (public, authenticated, admin)
  • Include error scenarios in acceptance criteria
  • Number features for easy reference (F1, F2, F3...)

Knowledge Strategy

  • Patterns to capture: Successful PRD structures, common MEAN features (auth, CRUD, real-time), good acceptance criteria examples
  • Examples to collect: Completed PRDs that led to successful implementations
  • Update permission: Agents may freely add/update files in references/. Changes to SKILL.md or scripts/ require user approval.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.