Ios code review
Review iOS code for compliance with standards, NFRs, and security policy.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add edfenton/claude-skills --skill ios-code-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
- runs commandsInstructs the agent to run 3 commands, including `./scripts/lint.sh` and 2 more.
SKILL.md
1.5 KB, 329 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Purpose
Review code against ios-std, ios-nfr, and ios-sec policies. Report issues, then (with approval) fix and run tests to confirm.
Arguments
--paths <glob>— Limit review scope (default: whole repo)--no-fix— Report only, don't offer to fix
Workflow
1. Automated gates
./scripts/lint.sh # SwiftLint
./scripts/format.sh # SwiftFormat (check mode)
If scripts don't exist, note that repo doesn't match scaffold expectations.
2. Policy review
Review against:
- ios-std — MVVM boundaries, SwiftUI conventions, project structure
- ios-nfr — performance, accessibility, offline correctness, app store readiness
- ios-sec — keychain usage, ATS, deep link validation, logging hygiene
For each issue, note:
- Category:
std|nfr|sec - Severity:
must-fix|should-fix|nice-to-have - File and location
- What's wrong and how to fix it
3. Report results
Summary of automated gate results + policy findings grouped by severity.
4–5. Approval gate, fix and confirm
See /shared-review-workflow for severity definitions, approval gate protocol, and fix constraints. Run /ios-unit-test to confirm no regressions after fixes.
Reference
For review checklists and common issues, see reference/ios-code-review-reference.md
What ships with it: 1 file
8.7 KB alongside SKILL.md