agentsclimarketplace

Review

Skill eddmann/agent-toolkit/skills/review

Review code against coding guidelines and best practicesFrom its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add eddmann/agent-toolkit --skill review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

2.6 KB, 593 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

ultrathink: Perform a thorough code review by first reading all relevant code and guidelines, then providing specific, actionable feedback.

Your Task

Review: $ARGUMENTS

Context

  • Current directory: !pwd
  • Git status: !git status --short 2>/dev/null | head -20

Guidelines to Apply

Read and apply these standards from the guidelines directory ($GUIDELINES_DIR):

  • $GUIDELINES_DIR/foundation/code-philosophy.md
  • $GUIDELINES_DIR/practices/clean-code-practices.md
  • $GUIDELINES_DIR/practices/design-principles.md
  • $GUIDELINES_DIR/practices/testing.md
  • $GUIDELINES_DIR/practices/error-handling.md

Instructions

Phase 1: Load Guidelines

First, read ALL the guideline files above. Understand:

  • Code philosophy: predictable, boring, declarative, immutable
  • Clean code: small functions, descriptive naming, early returns, no magic numbers
  • Design: KISS, single responsibility, dependency injection, composition
  • Testing: classical school, behavior-focused, AAA pattern, stubs over mocks
  • Errors: fail fast, don't hide failures, validate at boundaries

Phase 2: Read the Code

Thoroughly read the code to review:

  1. Read all relevant files in the target area
  2. Understand the context - what does this code do?
  3. Trace dependencies - what does it interact with?
  4. Check tests - are behaviors well-tested?

Phase 3: Evaluate Against Guidelines

For each issue found:

  1. Identify the specific guideline being violated
  2. Quote the relevant code with file:line reference
  3. Explain why it matters - what's the risk or cost?
  4. Suggest a fix - be specific and actionable

Phase 4: Provide Summary

Organize your review:

  1. Critical issues - must fix, violates core principles
  2. Improvements - should fix, better aligns with guidelines
  3. Nitpicks - optional, minor style preferences
  4. Praise - what's done well (briefly)

Output Format

For each issue:

### [Critical/Improvement/Nitpick]: Brief title

**Location**: `path/to/file.swift:42`
**Guideline**: [Quote relevant guideline]
**Issue**: [What's wrong]
**Suggestion**: [How to fix]

Critical Rules

  • DO NOT make changes - this is review only
  • Cite specific guidelines - not just "this is bad"
  • Be actionable - every issue should have a clear fix
  • Include file:line - make issues easy to find

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.