Code review and quality
Skill ed1son99/skills/skills/code-quality/code-review-and-quality
Collection of Hermes Agent skills — 255 reusable AI agent workflows across 39 categories
npx -y skills add ed1son99/skills --skill code-review-and-qualityAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
多维度代码审查 — correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance
SKILL.md
0.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
code-review-and-quality
多维度代码审查 — correctness, readability, architecture, security, performance
概述
在合并前进行多轴代码审查。评估正确性、可读性、架构、安全性和性能。适用于审查自己、其他 agent 或人类编写的代码。
使用场景
触发关键词: review, 审查, code review, 代码质量, quality, 审查代码
分类
所属分类: code-quality
注意事项
本 Skill 由 Claude Code 自动加载。使用 Skill 工具调用。
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most code review skills give
Counted across 610 of the 674 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06
- push back with technical reasoning if wrongin 60 of 610, across 24 files
- ask for clarification on unclear itemsin 51 of 610, across 16 files
- fix critical issues immediatelyin 45 of 610, across 29 files
- implement one item at a timein 45 of 610, across 11 files
- group findings by severityin 44 of 610, across 43 files
- verify feedback against the codebasein 42 of 610, across 8 files
- dispatch a code reviewer subagentin 39 of 610, across 23 files
- fix important issues before proceedingin 37 of 610, across 22 files
- test each fix individuallyin 35 of 610, across 7 files
- reply in github comment threadsin 33 of 610, across 5 files
- check for security vulnerabilitiesin 31 of 610, across 27 files
- factualize corrections without over-explainingin 30 of 610, across 2 files
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.