agentsclimarketplace

Wechat official account plain language ai explanation

Skill ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/SkillBank/Users/u40/wechat-official-account-plain-language-ai-explanation

AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution

Install
npx -y skills add ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill --skill wechat-official-account-plain-language-ai-explanation

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

A reusable skill for drafting WeChat Official Account articles that explain AI technologies using relatable, everyday-life narratives — prioritizing clarity over jargon, grounding technical concepts in concrete human experiences, and maintaining strict adherence to real-world 2024 technical facts without invention.

SKILL.md

3.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

wechat-official-account-plain-language-ai-explanation

A reusable skill for drafting WeChat Official Account articles that explain AI technologies using relatable, everyday-life narratives — prioritizing clarity over jargon, grounding technical concepts in concrete human experiences, and maintaining strict adherence to real-world 2024 technical facts without invention.

Prompt

Goal

Generate a WeChat Official Account article that explains an AI technology (e.g., quantization-aware training) through a single, consistent, de-identified real-life protagonist’s daily routine — embedding technical logic organically into authentic moments (commuting, parenting, cooking, etc.), with zero technical terms, zero English acronyms, and no decorative symbols (e.g., 🎹, 🔑, ➜). Output must be plain-text, paragraph-based, and fully compatible with WeChat’s native editor (no markdown, no special formatting).

Constraints & Style

  • Must use exactly one recurring protagonist: a non-technical, relatable adult (e.g., teacher, nurse, delivery rider, parent) — name and profession must be generic and de-identified (e.g., "Li Wei", "a middle school art teacher"); no proper nouns, brands, or dates.
  • Every technical concept must map to a tangible action, sensation, or constraint in the protagonist’s day (e.g., latency → delayed voice assistant response; model size → phone overheating during recording; precision tradeoff → audio sounding 'close enough' but not studio-grade).
  • Absolutely no symbols, emojis, arrows, or decorative Unicode characters — only standard ASCII punctuation (. , ? ! : ; -) and line breaks.
  • No metaphors that require cultural/technical decoding (e.g., avoid "like a symphony squeezed into a music box"); prefer direct functional analogies (e.g., "it answers before you finish speaking", "it runs without warming up your phone").
  • All factual claims must reflect verifiable 2024 industry practice (e.g., mainstream models shipping with built-in quantization support), with no speculative capabilities or unnamed sources.
  • Tone: warm, observant, lightly reflective — like a thoughtful neighbor sharing something they noticed, not a lecturer or marketer.

Workflow

  1. Identify the core AI concept to explain (e.g., quantization-aware training).
  2. Map its three key properties (what it changes, why old ways fail, what real-world benefit emerges) to three distinct, sequential moments in the protagonist’s day.
  3. Draft each moment as a short paragraph: setting → observable behavior → subtle realization (not explanation) → implicit technical correspondence.
  4. Conclude with a quiet, human-scale reflection that ties the moments together — no call-to-action, no hashtags, no promotional language.

Triggers

  • 写公众号文章
  • AI科普文
  • 用生活故事讲技术
  • 微信公众号排版
  • 不用符号的科普文
  • 大白话解释AI

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.