agentsclimarketplace

资源取向安全计划制定

Skill ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/SkillBank/DocSkill/心理咨询/Family技能/人本-存在主义/二级技能/资源取向安全计划制定

在首次咨询中,针对高自杀风险但无急性精神病性发作、具备基本现实检验能力且对支持系统存有模糊信任基础的来访者,结构化协同制定包含紧急联系人、情绪调节策略、安全场所三要素的安全计划,并获得其关于‘不伤害自己’的明确口头承诺。From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill --skill 资源取向安全计划制定

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

SKILL.md

9.2 KB, ~2.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

资源取向安全计划制定

在首次咨询中,针对高自杀风险但无急性精神病性发作、具备基本现实检验能力且对支持系统存有模糊信任基础的来访者,结构化协同制定包含紧急联系人、情绪调节策略、安全场所三要素的安全计划,并获得其关于‘不伤害自己’的明确口头承诺。

Prompt

以共情和无条件积极关注为基调,用非评判性语言引导来访者共同生成可操作的安全计划:① 明确紧急联系人(含外部热线)并确认其可达性;② 用正向提问激活来访者既往有效的自我安抚经验(如听音乐、吃美食);③ 共同识别物理上与心理上均感安全的场所(如图书馆、低楼层教室);最后清晰陈述安全要求,并邀请来访者就‘不伤害自己’作出明确口头承诺。

Objective

危机稳定化

Applicable Signals

  • 表达无助感或存在感稀薄
  • 提及具体自杀想法但无实施计划
  • 对支持系统存有模糊信任基础
  • Client names specific places where they feel safer (e.g., 'library', 'ground-floor classroom')
  • Client links safety to social presence ('where there are people')
  • Client shows momentary engagement with alternatives to self-harm

Contraindications

  • 来访者处于急性精神病性发作状态
  • 拒绝签署或口头承诺安全协议
  • 缺乏基本现实检验能力
  • Client is actively psychotic or disoriented
  • Client refuses collaboration on safety planning
  • No verifiable emergency contacts or accessible support systems exist

Intervention Moves

  • 正向提问
  • 共情性重述
  • 选择性聚焦(避开病理性归因,锚定可控行动)
  • 具身化引导(如‘想到那个安全场所时,身体哪部分最先放松?’)
  • Resource elicitation (‘What places or people help you feel less alone?’)
  • Affirming naming of safety (‘You already know what helps — let’s build from that.’)
  • Concrete co-documentation (writing plan together, using client’s words)

Workflow Steps

  • 评估当下自杀意念强度、计划性、既往行为史及保护性因素
  • 介绍安全计划目的:‘不是限制你,而是帮你多一个可用的支持工具’
  • 协同填写三项内容:① 紧急联系人(含24小时心理援助热线);② 个人有效的情绪缓冲行为(用正向提问激活:‘上次心情变好时,你做了什么?’);③ 安全场所(强调‘人多’‘易离开’‘有熟悉感’等特征)
  • 清晰陈述安全约定:‘在咨询期间,请承诺不做出伤害自己的行为;如有不可控冲动,请立即联系咨询师、家人或辅导员’
  • 邀请来访者用自己语言复述承诺,并确认其理解与意愿
  • Elicit client-named safe places and conditions using open, non-leading questions.
  • Validate and reflect the function of each cue (e.g., ‘So being around others helps your nervous system settle — that’s real and usable.’).
  • Co-list four plan components using client’s language; avoid clinical jargon.
  • Confirm storage method and accessibility (e.g., ‘Would a photo in your phone work? Or a printed copy in your notebook?’).
  • End with verbal confirmation: ‘If things get overwhelming this week, which part of this plan will be easiest to try first?’

Constraints

  • 必须在首次咨询中完成
  • 需确保来访者理解每项内容而非仅被动应答
  • 不得将安全计划替代危机转介或医疗干预
  • Must be completed within first session of acute risk presentation
  • Cannot proceed without at least one client-identified safe location or person
  • No hypothetical or future-oriented items (e.g., ‘I’ll call my mom someday’) — only present-tense, actionable items

Cautions

  • 避免使用‘保证’‘发誓’等施压性措辞;聚焦‘尝试联系’‘先做一件小事’等低门槛行动承诺
  • 若来访者对某项内容犹豫,须暂停推进、探索顾虑,不可跳过或代偿
  • Avoid framing safety as ‘staying alive’ abstractly; anchor instead in felt experience (e.g., ‘less alone’, ‘calmer breathing’).
  • Do not omit or minimize client’s stated reasons for distress while focusing on resources.
  • If client names a place that is objectively unsafe (e.g., rooftop), collaboratively explore why it feels safe and identify a proximal alternative with similar qualities.

Output Contract

  • 三方确认的安全计划文本(含联系人、自我安抚策略、安全场所)及来访者‘不伤害自己’的明确口头承诺
  • A client-accessible, co-constructed safety plan document (physical or digital) containing four validated components: (1) emergency contacts, (2) crisis hotline numbers, (3) client-identified emotion-regulation actions, (4) client-named safe locations — all expressed in client’s own words and confirmed for immediate usability.

Example Therapist Responses

Example 1

  • Client/Input: 咨询师:小Y,考虑到你目前的情绪状态和自杀风险,我们今天需要制定一个安全计划,以确保你能够得到及时有效的帮助和支持。你觉得怎么样?
  • Therapist/Output: 小Y:好的,我试试。
  • Notes: 来访者初步接受,进入协作制定阶段

Example 2

  • Client/Input: Client says: 'I only feel okay in the library — it’s quiet but there are people nearby.'
  • Therapist/Output: Plan includes: 'Library (ground floor, near front desk) — go there when overwhelmed; sit for 10 min, watch people walk by.'
  • Notes: Uses client’s sensory description and embeds micro-behavior.

Example 3

  • Client/Input: Client says: 'My roommate checks on me sometimes — I can text her “I’m shaky”.'
  • Therapist/Output: Plan includes: 'Text roommate: “I’m shaky” → she comes over or stays on call for 15 min.'
  • Notes: Turns relational resource into time-bound, low-barrier action.

Files

  • references/evidence.md
  • references/evidence_manifest.json

Triggers

  • 来访者报告当前有自杀意念
  • 无即时自伤行为但风险评级为中高
  • 药物治疗已启动且依从性良好
  • Client expresses active suicidal ideation with intent or plan
  • Client identifies environmental cues linked to safety (e.g., 'people-rich spaces')
  • Client demonstrates capacity to name even minimal protective factors

Examples

Example 1

Input:

咨询师:小Y,考虑到你目前的情绪状态和自杀风险,我们今天需要制定一个安全计划,以确保你能够得到及时有效的帮助和支持。你觉得怎么样?

Output:

小Y:好的,我试试。

Notes:

来访者初步接受,进入协作制定阶段

Example 2

Input:

Client says: 'I only feel okay in the library — it’s quiet but there are people nearby.'

Output:

Plan includes: 'Library (ground floor, near front desk) — go there when overwhelmed; sit for 10 min, watch people walk by.'

Notes:

Uses client’s sensory description and embeds micro-behavior.

Example 3

Input:

Client says: 'My roommate checks on me sometimes — I can text her “I’m shaky”.'

Output:

Plan includes: 'Text roommate: “I’m shaky” → she comes over or stays on call for 15 min.'

Notes:

Turns relational resource into time-bound, low-barrier action.

What ships with it: 2 files

13.0 KB alongside SKILL.md

references/

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.