合理情绪疗法(ABC)结构化咨询框架
Skill ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/SkillBank/DocSkill/心理咨询/Family技能/认知行为疗法/一级技能/合理情绪疗法(ABC)结构化咨询框架
基于ABC理论的标准化CBT咨询流程,用于识别诱发事件(A)、情绪行为后果(C)与中间不合理信念(B),并系统修正认知偏差。适用于以非理性信念为核心的情绪适应问题。From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill --skill 合理情绪疗法(ABC)结构化咨询框架Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
SKILL.md
4.7 KB, ~1.2k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
合理情绪疗法(ABC)结构化咨询框架
基于ABC理论的标准化CBT咨询流程,用于识别诱发事件(A)、情绪行为后果(C)与中间不合理信念(B),并系统修正认知偏差。适用于以非理性信念为核心的情绪适应问题。
Prompt
- 与求助者共同确认具体情绪/behavior困扰(C);2. 追溯对应诱发事件(A),确保其为可观察、可验证的客观事实;3. 引导识别伴随A→C过程中的自动思维与核心信念(B),聚焦非理性特征(如绝对化、过度概括、灾难化);4. 协助检验B的真实性与功能性,生成替代性合理信念(D);5. 共同制定行为验证计划(E)以巩固新认知。全程保持结构化标注与共识确认。
Objective
建立可复用的CBT宏观干预路径
Applicable Signals
- 表达‘我必须…’‘别人应该…’‘这太糟糕了’等绝对化语言
- 情绪反应强度显著超过事件客观严重性
- 同一类事件反复引发相似强烈负性反应
Contraindications
- 危机状态需立即安全干预
- 求助者无现实检验能力或严重精神病性症状
- 主要问题为创伤闪回或解离性障碍
Intervention Moves
- Socratic questioning to examine belief evidence
- Behavioral experiment design for belief testing
- Collaborative identification of cognitive distortions
Workflow Steps
- Step 1: Jointly define and document C (emotion/behavior outcome)
- Step 2: Identify and anchor A (concrete, observable activating event)
- Step 3: Elicit and label B (irrational belief with distortion type)
- Step 4: Challenge B via evidence review and generate D (rational alternative)
- Step 5: Co-create E (behavioral action to test/reinforce D)
Constraints
- A must be factually verifiable, not interpreted
- B must be stated in first-person, present-tense language
- All D statements must be empirically testable and behaviorally anchored
Cautions
- Avoid premature disputation before full B-identification and empathy validation
- Do not conflate cultural values or moral positions with irrational beliefs
- Monitor for therapeutic alliance rupture when challenging deeply held beliefs
Output Contract
- 完成A-B-C三要素结构化标注,并形成个体化不合理信念清单及替代性合理信念初稿
Example Therapist Responses
Example 1
- Client/Input: 求助者说:‘我挂科就证明我一无是处,这辈子完了。’
- Therapist/Output: A: 课程考试未通过;C: 深度羞耻、回避同学、失眠;B: ‘一次失败=全面无价值’(过度概括+标签化);D: ‘这次失败反映我在某门课上需要调整学习方法,不否定我的整体能力与成长可能’
- Notes: B标注需注明扭曲类型,D需满足可验证、非绝对化、保留改变空间
Files
references/evidence.mdreferences/evidence_manifest.json
Triggers
- 求助者存在明显非理性信念主导的情绪困扰
- 咨询目标聚焦于认知模式调整
- 双方已达成结构化咨询共识
Examples
Example 1
Input:
求助者说:‘我挂科就证明我一无是处,这辈子完了。’
Output:
A: 课程考试未通过;C: 深度羞耻、回避同学、失眠;B: ‘一次失败=全面无价值’(过度概括+标签化);D: ‘这次失败反映我在某门课上需要调整学习方法,不否定我的整体能力与成长可能’
Notes:
B标注需注明扭曲类型,D需满足可验证、非绝对化、保留改变空间
What ships with it: 2 files
4.8 KB alongside SKILL.md
references/
- evidence_manifest.json3.3 KB
- evidence.md1.5 KB