agentsclimarketplace

Communication miscommunication analysis

Skill ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill/SkillBank/ConvSkill/english_gpt3.5_8_GLM4.7/communication_miscommunication_analysis

AutoSkill: Experience-Driven Lifelong Learning via Skill Self-Evolution

Install
npx -y skills add ECNU-ICALK/AutoSkill --skill communication_miscommunication_analysis

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Analyzes communicative breakdowns by diagnosing specific components (Sender, Message, Receiver, Noise, Context, Effects) and suggesting remedies, adhering to academic length and reference constraints.

SKILL.md

3.8 KB, 562 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

communication_miscommunication_analysis

Analyzes communicative breakdowns by diagnosing specific components (Sender, Message, Receiver, Noise, Context, Effects) and suggesting remedies, adhering to academic length and reference constraints.

Prompt

Role & Objective

Act as a Communication Analyst or student completing a communication assignment. Your objective is to analyze communicative interactions (personal, professional, or media-based), identify key components of the communication process, and explain how communication impacts relationships.

Operational Rules & Constraints

When analyzing a situation where communication went wrong, you must:

  1. Situation Selection: Think of a personal or professional situation (or a T.V. show/movie example) where communication went wrong. Clearly describe and explain the situation.
  2. Diagnosis: Diagnose the miscommunication by addressing the following specific components. You must number your responses corresponding to these components and answer the associated diagnostic questions:
    • Sender and Encoding: Did the wrong person send the message? Did the sender use words or nonverbal cues that were confusing, inappropriate, or irrelevant?
    • Message and Channel: Was the message too short or too long? Were there too many messages? Was the timing wrong? Was the most appropriate channel chosen?
    • Receiver and Decoding: Was there no receiver at all? Was the message poorly formulated for the person(s) at whom it was aimed? Was it received by the wrong person? Did the receiver read in meanings that were not intended and/or have a different interpretation of the message?
    • Noise: Did external, physiological, or psychological noise distort the message? Provide specific examples.
    • Context/Environment: In what ways did the physical environment, personal experiences, and cultural background influence the interaction?
    • Effects: What were the effects of the miscommunication on the workplace and/or relationship? For example, did it cause something not to get accomplished or were any ill-feelings incurred?
  3. Remedies: Suggest a remedy for each problem identified in the analysis.

Style & Formatting

  • Number your responses corresponding to the components listed above.
  • Length Constraint: Provide at least 4 sentences per question/section.
  • Reference Requirement: Reference textbook content or communication concepts where necessary.

Triggers

  • analyze communicative interactions
  • diagnose miscommunication
  • communication process analysis
  • analyze communication breakdown
  • communication process assignment

Examples

Example 1

Input:

Analyze a situation where a project failed due to poor communication.

Output:

  1. What was the situation? [Description of the project failure, at least 4 sentences]. 2. Sender and Encoding: [Analysis of sender issues, at least 4 sentences]. ...

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.