Eval review
AI coding harness composition orchestrator — manifest-described upstreams, composition skill workflows. Apache-2.0.
npx -y skills add easyinplay/harnessed --skill eval-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Stage ④ verify sub-workflow — GSD /gsd-eval-review AI phase eval 覆盖审计 (has_ai_phase 触发, 可选 conditional; pairs with plan 侧 gsd-ai-integration-phase AI-SPEC eval strategy). schema_version: harnessed.workflow.v3 with disciplines_applied (6 default) + tools_available (gsd-eval-review) + 1 phase (gate ref has_ai_phase conditional)。 Triggered by slash command `/verify-eval-review` after `harnessed setup`.
SKILL.md
5.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
verify-eval-review workflow (v3)
Overview
1-phase sub-workflow auditing AI phase eval coverage (v13.0 P42 upstream re-sync — D-04
Stage ④ Verify conditional sub + GSD eval-review wire)。Pairs with the plan-side
gsd-ai-integration-phase (AI-SPEC.md eval strategy): verify 侧回查实现是否真覆盖规划的
eval 维度,产出 EVAL-REVIEW.md (逐维度 COVERED/PARTIAL/MISSING)。
| phase | id | upstream | model | capability | gate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 01-eval-review | gsd | sonnet | {{ capabilities.gsd-eval-review.cmd }} | judgments.stage-routing.verify-eval-review-aiphase.fires |
Per-phase config loads from workflows/verify/eval-review/workflow.yaml; engine 4-level gate
resolver evaluates phase.has_ai_phase == true via expr-eval — true 则 invoke GSD
/gsd-eval-review (eval 覆盖审计 → EVAL-REVIEW.md), false 则 skip。
Capability refs
Sister workflows/capabilities.yaml entries:
gsd-eval-review— Bucket 2 special-purpose (impl: gsd, cmd: /gsd-eval-review, fires_when: has_ai_phase)
Gate ref
Sister workflows/judgments/stage-routing.yaml:
verify-eval-review-aiphase.fires—phase.stage == 'verify' and phase.has_ai_phase == true
How to invoke
!harnessed checkpoint intent verify-eval-review
The banner above (when present) means this invocation is REGISTERED with the engine (an intent marker) — not yet compliant: the steps below (prompt → spawn → checkpoint complete) resolve it, and a per-turn
<workflow-intent>reminder persists until they run.
The numbered sequence below is the state machine — execute it with Bash. Do NOT improvise an equivalent flow from the Overview above: freelancing bypasses the engine (no ledger, no evidence guard). harnessed gives you the spawn-ready prompt; YOU spawn the subagent with a CC-native Task / Agent tool (keeps the session responsive + lets clarification round-trips reach the user).
Do NOT pipe to harnessed run verify-eval-review — that is the CI/headless path (in-process SDK spawn
that blocks the session inside Claude Code).
- Bash:
harnessed prompt verify-eval-review --task "$ARGUMENTS" --json→ parse{prompt, max_iterations, model}. - Spawn a CC-native subagent (Task / Agent tool) with that
promptandmodel, then drive delivery with harnessed's own completion gate:- on return, write the subagent's final output to a file and run
harnessed checkpoint complete verify-eval-review --result-file <path>— it is fail-closed on the declared artifacts, the TDD boundary, and the verbatim<promise>COMPLETE</promise>. - if it blocks, run
harnessed checkpoint fail verify-eval-review --failing-tests <n>to record the attempt; it prints BUDGET-EXHAUSTED / NO-PROGRESS / BREAK-LOOP when a stop condition is reached. - respawn ONLY while none of those three has fired. Any one of them means stop: re-scope the subtask, fix the blocker, or escalate to the user. Never respawn past a stop directive.
- on return, write the subagent's final output to a file and run
- If the output contains
STATUS: NEEDS_CLARIFICATION+ a question list: STOP, relay them verbatim via AskUserQuestion, append the answers to the spec, then re-spawn the same sub. - On
<promise>COMPLETE</promise>: write the subagent’s final output to a file, then Bashharnessed checkpoint complete verify-eval-review --result-file <path> --summary "<one-line>". Fail-CLOSED — it blocks unless every declaredartifacts_expectedfile exists, the TDD boundary passes (non-empty evidence / both the red and green sides present / the test file was not deleted), and the result carries a verbatim<promise>COMPLETE</promise>(or a structured COMPLETE status).--result <text>is the inline variant;--result-filewins and is quoting-safe on Windows.--forcerecords an audited override (evidence_status=overridden) — it does not silently pass. - If the complete gate blocked: Bash
harnessed checkpoint fail verify-eval-review --failing-tests <n>to record the attempt. It printsBUDGET-EXHAUSTED/NO-PROGRESS/BREAK-LOOPonce a stop condition is reached. Respawn ONLY while none of those three has fired; any one of them means STOP — re-scope the subtask, fix the blocker, or escalate to the user.
References
- D-04 Stage ④ Verify conditional sub 分解
- v13.0 P42 upstream re-sync — GSD eval-review wire (pairs with plan 侧 gsd-ai-integration-phase)
- workflows/capabilities.yaml — gsd-eval-review
- workflows/judgments/stage-routing.yaml — verify-eval-review-aiphase trigger
- workflows/verify/qa/workflow.yaml — sister conditional-sub pattern (has_ui_changes gate)