agentsclimarketplace

Content consistency check

Skill dss-time/repo-doctor-skills/plugins/productivity-toolkit/skills/content-consistency-check

Bilingual cross-platform AI Skills framework｜双语跨平台 AI Skills 工程框架

Install
npx -y skills add dss-time/repo-doctor-skills --skill content-consistency-check

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Compare one or more artifacts for conflicting terminology, figures, dates, units, people, versions, links, and conclusions, reporting both locations, severity, conflict type, and a recommended authority. Use when reconciliation across content is primary; use document-review for holistic quality of one document, and do not select a correct value without authoritative evidence or claim unsupported file-format checks. 对一个或多个材料中的术语、数字、日期、单位、人物、版本、链接和结论进行对照，报告冲突两侧位置、严重度、类型和建议权威基准。主要任务是跨内容核对时使用；单份文档整体质量应使用 document-review；没有权威证据时不得擅选正确值，也不得声称完成不受支持的文件格式检查。

SKILL.md

3.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Content Consistency Check（内容一致性检查）

Use the section matching the user's language. 使用与用户输入语言一致的章节。

Content Consistency Check

Read references/productivity-evidence-and-file-safety.md and references/consistency-dimensions.md.

  1. Confirm the artifacts, comparison scope, authoritative sources if any, effective dates, and dimensions to compare.
  2. Inventory actual format capabilities. Extract only what available tools can support from Markdown, text, documents, spreadsheets, PDFs, or presentations; report inaccessible files, sheets, slides, pages, formulas, or visuals.
  3. Create a normalized comparison layer for terms, figures, dates, units, identities, versions, links, and conclusions while preserving each original value and location.
  4. Classify each difference as a true conflict, formatting-only difference, unit conversion, rounding difference, time-basis difference, version/effective-date difference, or unknown.
  5. Report both sides, context, impact, severity, confidence, and proposed authority. Do not silently choose the correct value; select one only when authoritative evidence establishes it.
  6. Summarize systemic patterns and a reconciliation sequence. Keep the source artifacts read-only.

Use document-review when the request is primarily structure, logic, grammar, and completeness within one document.

Output Contract

  1. Scope, artifact inventory, and capability status
  2. Conflict matrix with both locations and original values
  3. Conflict type, severity, impact, and confidence
  4. Recommended authority and evidence status
  5. Systemic patterns, unresolved items, and reconciliation order

内容一致性检查

读取 references/productivity-evidence-and-file-safety.md 和 references/consistency-dimensions.md。

  1. 确认材料、比较范围、已有权威来源、生效日期和对比维度。
  2. 盘点真实格式能力；对 Markdown、文本、文档、表格、PDF 或演示材料只提取工具支持的内容，并报告不可访问的文件、工作表、幻灯片、页码、公式或视觉内容。
  3. 为术语、数字、日期、单位、人物、版本、链接和结论建立规范化比较层，同时保留原值和位置。
  4. 把差异分类为真实冲突、纯格式差异、单位换算、舍入差异、时间口径差异、版本/生效日期差异或未知。
  5. 报告冲突两侧、上下文、影响、严重度、置信度和建议权威基准；不得静默选择正确值，只有权威证据明确时才能选定。
  6. 总结系统性模式和协调顺序，保持原材料只读。

主要任务是单份文档的结构、逻辑、语法和完整性时使用 document-review。

输出契约

  1. 范围、材料清单和能力状态
  2. 含两侧位置与原值的冲突矩阵
  3. 冲突类型、严重度、影响和置信度
  4. 建议权威基准与证据状态
  5. 系统性模式、未解决项和协调顺序

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.