agentsclimarketplace
Sign in

Nsfc justification writer

Skill dongzhigang13305312738-art/paper-skills/nsfc-justification-writer

当用户明确要求"写/改 NSFC 立项依据""立项依据写作/重构"时使用。基于最小信息表输出价值与必要性、现状不足、科学问题/假说与项目切入点，并保持模板结构不被破坏。适用于 NSFC 及各类科研基金申请书的立项依据写作场景。From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add dongzhigang13305312738-art/paper-skills --skill nsfc-justification-writer

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

3 things to look at

  • 24 days oldThe repository was created 24 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

SKILL.md

4.4 KB, ~1.3k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

科研立项依据写作器

BenszAPI 任务工作区

本 Skill 的新任务中间文件统一写入 ./.bensz-api/task-{yyyymmdd-hhmm}-{简短描述}/{skill名}/input|output|log/。同一任务复用一个任务根目录；多 Skill 协作才创建 shared/。正式交付物不写入该目录，历史隐藏目录只允许显式兼容读取、迁移或清理。

与 bensz-collect-bugs 的协作约定

  • 当用户环境中出现因本 skill 设计缺陷导致的 bug 时，优先使用 bensz-collect-bugs 按规范记录到 ~/.bensz-skills/bugs/，严禁直接修改用户本地 Claude Code / Codex 中已安装的 skill 源码。
  • 若 AI 仍可通过 workaround 继续完成用户任务，应先记录 bug，再继续完成当前任务。
  • 当用户明确要求“report bensz skills bugs”等公开上报动作时，调用本地 gh 与 bensz-collect-bugs，仅上传新增 bug 到 huangwb8/bensz-bugs；不要 pull / clone 整个 bug 仓库。

输出契约

  • 唯一默认写入落点：extraTex/1.1.立项依据.tex
  • 禁止改动：main.tex、extraTex/@config.tex、任何 .cls/.sty
  • 目标：把“为什么要做、现状为什么不够、科学问题是什么、项目如何切入”写清楚
  • 默认写作导向是 theoretical，可在 config.yaml:style.mode 切为 mixed 或 engineering

输入

  • 最小信息表优先使用 references/info_form.md
  • 科学问题与假说口径统一看：
    • references/scientific_question_guidelines.md
    • references/scientific_hypothesis_guidelines.md
  • 推荐用 scripts/run.py init 帮用户快速生成和补全信息表

硬规则

  • 只编辑 extraTex/1.1.立项依据.tex
  • 优先保留现有 \subsubsection 骨架，只替换正文
  • 不写无法核验的“国际领先/国内首次”等表述
  • 引用外部工作前先要求用户提供 DOI/链接或可核验题录信息
  • 若 AI 不可用，必须回退到硬编码能力，不得直接停工

推荐工作流

  1. 定位项目与目标文件。
  2. 抽取现有小标题骨架与正文范围。
  3. 用 scripts/run.py coach --stage auto 判断当前处于 skeleton / draft / revise / polish 哪一阶段。
  4. 围绕 4 段闭环组织内容：
    • 价值与必要性
    • 现状与不足
    • 科学问题 / 科学假设
    • 本项目切入点与贡献
  5. 做可核验性与引用守护，避免吹牛式表述。
  6. 检查与 2.1 研究内容 的术语、缩写、指标一致性。
  7. 解析目标字数；无显式要求时再用配置兜底。
  8. 输出诊断、评审建议或安全写回结果。

关键能力

  • Tier1 硬编码诊断：结构、字数、引用键、危险命令、高风险表述提示
  • AI 语义能力：内容维度覆盖、吹牛式表述识别、术语一致性、阶段判断、示例推荐
  • 安全写入：按 \subsubsection{...} 精确替换正文并自动备份
  • 可视化报告、diff、rollback、review 建议

常用脚本

  • scripts/run.py init
  • scripts/run.py coach --stage auto
  • scripts/run.py diagnose
  • scripts/run.py review
  • scripts/run.py apply-section
  • scripts/run.py diff
  • scripts/run.py rollback

只读集成

  • 支持只读访问 research-literature-review 的结果目录，用于提取研究现状和验证引用一致性；历史工作区目录名仍为 .systematic-literature-review/
  • 集成逻辑见 scripts/core/review_integration.py
  • 该集成是只读的，不得修改综述目录内容

重点参考

  • references/theoretical_innovation_guidelines.md
  • references/methodology_term_examples.md
  • references/boastful_expression_guidelines.md
  • references/dimension_coverage_design.md
  • references/dod_checklist.md
  • scripts/README.md

What ships with it: 79 files

311.1 KB alongside SKILL.md, 36 of them executable

assets/

references/

39 more files not listed here. See all 79 in the repository.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,512. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.