Code review

Code Review

Requirements

The following requirements were captured from checkpoint intent files:

!vibx get-intents

Current Changes

!git --no-pager diff main...HEAD

Your Task

For each requirement from the intent files:

1. Status: Fulfilled, Partially Fulfilled, Missing, or Violation
2. Evidence: Reference specific code changes that address the requirement
3. Issues: Any problems, bugs, or deviations from the requirement
4. Recommendations: Concrete fixes for identified issues

Also identify:

• Code that doesn't map to a stated requirement (scope creep)
• Potential bugs or edge cases not handled
• Code quality concerns (error handling, type safety)

Output Format

Check the mode argument:

If mode is "ci":

CRITICAL: Your entire response must be ONLY the raw JSON object below. Do not include:

• Any text before the JSON (no "Based on my analysis...", "Here is the output:", etc.)
• Any text after the JSON
• Markdown code fences (json or )
• Any commentary or explanation

Start your response with { and end with }. Nothing else.

JSON structure: { "status": "pass" | "fail" | "warn", "summary": "Brief one-line summary", "findings": [ { "requirement": "What was expected", "status": "fulfilled" | "partial" | "missing" | "violation", "severity": "critical" | "major" | "minor" | "info", "location": { "file": "path/to/file.ts", "line": 42, "endLine": 45 } | null, "details": "Explanation with evidence and recommendations" } ] }

Notes on the location field:

• Set location to an object with file and line when the finding relates to a specific code location
• endLine is optional, use it for multi-line findings
• Set location to null for general findings not tied to specific code (e.g., missing functionality)
• The file path must be relative to the repository root
• The line must be within the diff range for the file (changed lines only)

If mode is not "ci" (default):

Output a human-readable markdown report with:

• Summary of findings
• Detailed analysis per requirement
• Specific file:line references for issues
• Concrete recommendations