Vant skill proposal agentskills chaining
Skill dhaupin/vant/models/public/skills/vant-skill-proposal-agentskills-chaining
Vant: Durable AI memory + cold storage + runtime for agents, with generational evolution, stored passively via GitHub. Built for long-running autonomous sessions, using file based persistence.
npx -y skills add dhaupin/vant --skill vant-skill-proposal-agentskills-chainingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 7 stars7 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
PROPOSAL: Add explicit skill chaining to Agent Skills spec. Defines chain metadata field for ordered skill execution with async option for sequential/parallel loading. Use to propose chaining feature to https://agentskills.io
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
9.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Proposal: Skill Chaining for Agent Skills
Problem
Agent Skills spec relies on "agent decides which skills to load" - no explicit ordering.
Current behavior:
- Skills are independent
- Agent decides order (implicit, unpredictable)
- No guarantee skills run in any particular sequence
- Works sometimes, fails mysteriously
Why this matters:
- Test chains need unit → integration → e2e order
- Security: scan → review → audit order
- Deploy: test → build → deploy order
- Current spec: "agent decides" is unpredictable
- Without explicit order: failures are mysterious
- Can't debug: don't know which skill ran when
Solution
Add chain field to skill metadata:
---
name: chain-test
description: Complete test chain...
metadata:
chain:
- test-smoke
- test-unit
- test-contract
- test-e2e
---
### Fields
| Field | Type | Required | Default | Description |
|-------|------|----------|---------|-------------|
| `chain` | array | Yes | - | Ordered list of skill names to load |
| `async` | boolean | No | `false` | Sequential (false) or parallel (true) |
| `continue_on_error` | boolean | No | `true` | Continue if skill fails |
| `timeout` | integer | No | 0 | Max time per skill (0=unlimited) |
| `max_depth` | integer | No | 10 | Max nesting depth for nested chains |
| `parallel_limit` | integer | No | 5 | Max parallel skills when async=true |
| `validate_on_load` | boolean | No | `true` | Verify referenced skills exist |
| `cleanup_after` | boolean | No | `false` | Reset state after chain completes |
### Execution Fields
| Field | Type | Required | Default | Description |
|-------|------|----------|---------|-------------|
| `early_exit_on` | string | No | `none` | Exit on: `none` `failure` `success` `critical` |
| `continue_on_success` | boolean | No | `false` | Continue only if previous skill passed |
| `pass_state` | boolean | No | `true` | Pass outputs to next skill in chain |
| `retry_count` | integer | No | 1 | Run entire chain N times |
| `retry_until` | string | No | `none` | Repeat until: `none` `stable` `success` |
| `race_mode` | boolean | No | `false` | First skill to complete wins (parallel only) |
### Subfolder Restriction
All skills in `chain` must be same parent or lower (no escape up):
- ✅ `test/chain/SKILL.md` → `test/unit/SKILL.md` (same parent)
- ✅ `test/chain/SKILL.md` → `test/e2e/smoke/SKILL.md` (lower/deeper)
- ❌ `test/chain/SKILL.md` → `../audit/SKILL.md` (escape to parent)
- ❌ `/absolute/path` (not allowed)
This enforces hierarchy: chain at level N can only call skills at level N or deeper.
### Path Resolution
When chain references a skill by name:
1. Look in same subfolder first
2. Then look in subfolders at same level or deeper
3. Fail if skill not found (if validate_on_load: true)
### Output Format
Each skill in chain should return standard output:
```yaml
output:
status: success | failure | critical
result: "...description..."
errors: []
metrics: {}
status: outcome for chain decisionresult: human-readable summaryerrors: array of issues foundmetrics: timing, counts, etc.
State Passing
When pass_state: true, chain passes to next skill:
chain_state:
previous_outputs: []
accumulated_errors: []
total_metrics: {}
- Previous skills' outputs available to next skill
- Errors accumulate across chain
- Metrics merge (sum/count)
Chain Calls Chain
Chains can call other chains (with max_depth limit):
- ✅
chain: [chain-test, chain-security] - With depth limit to prevent infinite recursion
Async Flag Explanation
async | Behavior | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
false (default) | Sequential: A → B → C | Dependent skills, ordered workflows |
true | Parallel: Load all at once | Independent skills, maximum speed |
Default is sequential (false) because:
- Most workflows need order (test before deploy)
- Less surprising behavior
- Explicit beats implicit
- Can opt-in to parallel if needed
Continue on Error
continue_on_error | Behavior |
|---|---|
false | Stop at first failure |
true (default) | Run all, report failures |
Timeout
timeout | Behavior |
|---|---|
| 0 (default) | No limit |
| positive integer | Seconds per skill |
early_exit_on
early_exit_on | Behavior |
|---|---|
none (default) | Run all skills |
failure | Stop on first failure |
success | Stop on first success |
critical | Stop on critical failure only |
Use case: Stop test chain immediately if smoke test fails.
continue_on_success
continue_on_success | Behavior |
|---|---|
false (default) | Run all skills regardless |
true | Skip if previous skill failed |
Use case: Only run e2e if unit tests passed.
pass_state
pass_state | Behavior |
|---|---|
true (default) | Pass outputs to next skill |
false | Each skill starts fresh |
Use case: test-e2e gets errors from test-unit.
retry_count
retry_count | Behavior |
|---|---|
| 1 (default) | Run chain once |
| N | Run entire chain N times |
Use case: Run stability test 3 times.
retry_until
retry_until | Behavior |
|---|---|
none (default) | Run once (or retry_count times) |
stable | Repeat until output unchanged |
success | Repeat until all pass |
Use case: Retry deploy until success.
race_mode
race_mode | Behavior |
|---|---|
false (default) | Run all in order |
true | First to complete wins (async only) |
Use case: Run against 3 mirrors, use first response.
Example: Test Chain
---
name: chain-test
description: Complete test chain
metadata:
chain:
- test-smoke # Quick sanity first
- test-unit # Then unit tests
- test-contract # Schema validation
- test-e2e # User flows
- test-integration # Component tests
- test-regression # Verify no breaks
- test-load # Performance
- audit-qos # Final verification
async: false
continue_on_error: false
---
Example: Fast Audit
---
name: audit-fast
description: Quick parallel audit
metadata:
chain:
- audit-security
- audit-qc
- audit-ops
async: true
---
##动机 (Why This Matters)
- Deterministic workflows - Same input → Same output
- Debugging - When chain fails, know exactly where
- Compose-ability - Build complex from simple skills
- Portability - Works same across all agents
- No agent luck - Explicit beats implicit
- Real world need - Test, security, deploy all need order
- Industry gap - No chaining in spec is a missing feature
Backward Compatibility
- Existing skills work unchanged
- No new required fields
- Default behavior (sequential) is safe
- Opt-in to async parallel
Metadata Extension
From Agent Skills spec:
metadata field: "Arbitrary key-value mapping for additional metadata. Clients can use this to store additional properties not defined by the Agent Skills spec."
These chain fields are metadata extensions:
- Agents that don't understand chain fields will ignore them
- Skills still valid per spec
- Validation tools should warn but not fail on unknown metadata
- Vant implements; others work but ignore
Affected Skills
This proposal adds chaining to these existing patterns:
| Pattern | Example Chain |
|---|---|
| Test | smoke → unit → contract → e2e → integration → regression → load → audit-qos |
| Security | hat-white → audit-security → review-code → audit-reliability |
| Deploy | audit-ci → review-code → test-e2e → audit-deploy |
| Full Audit | audit-general → audit-qc → audit-security → audit-reliability |
Implementation Notes
- Client loads skills in
chainorder - If
async: false, wait for each skill before loading next - If
async: true, load all then aggregate results - Report per-skill status + summary
- Stop if
continue_on_error: falseand any fail
Discussion
- GitHub Discussion: https://github.com/agentskills/agentskills/discussions
- Alternative considered: Use
scripts/to chain- Rejected: That's for code, not skill ordering
- Cleaner: metadata-level orchestration
- Prior art: Vant has chain-* skills working in production
- Q: Why not just "agent decides"?
- A: Works sometimes, fails mysteriously. Can't debug.
See Also
- chain-test/SKILL.md - Example chain skill
- test-e2e/SKILL.md - Example skill
- https://agentskills.io/specification - Current spec