Paper review

Skill dengzhe-hou/best-skills-research-writing/skills/review/paper-review

Curated skills from 50k+ star repos for research, writing, and review, ranked candidates per scenario

Install

npx -y skills add dengzhe-hou/best-skills-research-writing --skill paper-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Research review pipeline. Get critical feedback on research ideas from cross-model review. Use when user says 'review my idea', 'critique this', 'feedback on research'.

SKILL.md

1.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Research Review

Based on: wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep Original License: MIT

Overview

This skill provides critical feedback on research ideas using cross-model review.

Review Protocol

Phase 1: Load Context

Read the research idea/proposal
Understand the hypothesis, methodology, and expected results

Phase 2: External Review

Act as a senior reviewer (NeurIPS/ICML level):

Score the idea (1-10)
Identify weaknesses
Suggest minimum viable improvements
Provide concrete feedback on experimental design

Phase 3: Synthesize Feedback

Categorize issues by severity (critical/major/minor)
Provide actionable recommendations
Highlight strengths and opportunities

Review Dimensions

Novelty: Is this truly new? What's the closest existing work?
Significance: Does this matter? Who benefits?
Feasibility: Can this be done with available resources?
Experimental Design: Are the experiments well-designed?
Writing Quality: Is the idea clearly communicated?

Output Format

## Review Summary

**Score**: X/10

### Strengths
- [strength 1]
- [strength 2]

### Weaknesses (Critical)
- [weakness 1]
- [weakness 2]

### Weaknesses (Major)
- [weakness 3]

### Weaknesses (Minor)
- [weakness 4]

### Recommendations
1. [recommendation 1]
2. [recommendation 2]

### Minimum Viable Improvements
- [improvement 1]
- [improvement 2]

Key Rules

Be honest and constructive
Focus on substance, not style
Provide actionable feedback
Distinguish between critical and minor issues
Acknowledge strengths as well as weaknesses