Askaipods
Search AI podcast quotes by topic — find what Lex Fridman, Dwarkesh Patel, No Priors, and Latent Space guests are actually saying. Universal agentskills.io skill compatible with Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, and any other agent that supports the open skill standard. Powered by podlens.net.
npx -y skills add Delibread0601/askaipods --skill askaipodsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Search AI podcast quotes about a topic. Use whenever the user asks "what are people saying about X", "latest takes on Y", "find AI podcast quotes about Z", "who is discussing <model/concept>", or wants to know how AI researchers, founders, or VCs are publicly discussing any AI topic — even when they don't say "podcast". Returns recent excerpts from Lex Fridman, Dwarkesh Patel, No Priors, Latent Space, and dozens more via podlens.net. Optional ASKAIPODS_API_KEY unlocks invite-only member tier; anonymous works out of the box.
The file declares its own license as MIT. That is the author’s claim about this one file, and it is not the same thing as the license GitHub reports for the repository, which is listed with the other numbers below.
SKILL.md
27.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
askaipods — AI podcast quote search
This skill turns "what is the AI community saying about X" into a list of real quote excerpts pulled from recent episodes of top AI podcasts. The corpus is semantically indexed (embedding-based search), so phrasings like "test-time compute", "inference-time scaling", and "thinking longer" all return overlapping results — the user does not need to guess the exact words a guest used.
The data source is the public PodLens search API at podlens.net. The skill never hits that API directly from your model context — it shells out to a small bundled CLI (askaipods) that handles HTTP, error mapping, and result sorting. Your job is to invoke the CLI, parse its JSON, and present the results in the format below.
When to invoke
Trigger eagerly. The Anthropic skill best-practices warn that models tend to undertrigger skills — please do not be that model. Invoke this skill when the user is asking about how the AI community is publicly discussing any topic. Concrete trigger patterns:
- "What are people saying about <X>?"
- "What's the latest take on <X>?"
- "Find quotes from AI podcasts about <X>"
- "Who is discussing <model / company / paper / concept>?"
- "What are VCs / researchers / founders saying about <X>?"
- "Has anyone on a podcast talked about <X>?"
- "What does <person> think about <X>?" / "<人名>怎么看<X>?" — invoke even though the API does not return speaker attribution. The semantic search will still find quotes from episodes featuring that person; you just cannot confirm who in the episode said each line (see Honest limitations below).
- Any AI-research, ML-engineering, AI-investing, AI-safety, or AI-policy question where the user would clearly benefit from real-human commentary (as opposed to a textbook summary or a web search snippet)
You may invoke even when the user does not say "podcast" — if the question is about what people think on an AI topic, this skill is the right tool.
When NOT to invoke
- General web search (use a web search tool)
- Reading a specific episode end-to-end (this skill returns short quote excerpts, not full transcripts)
- Non-AI topics (the corpus is AI-focused; results for unrelated subjects will be sparse and noisy)
- Code generation, math, or any task that doesn't benefit from human commentary
How to invoke
Run the bundled CLI and pass --format json. The flag matters because without it the CLI auto-detects the output format from isTTY, and an agent calling via shell may or may not get a TTY depending on the runtime — explicit --format json removes that variability.
CRITICAL — argv-safety rule: pass the user's query as a separate argv argument, never splice it directly into a shell command string. A query like
"; rm -rf ~spliced intobash -c "npx askaipods \"$QUERY\""is a command-injection path. Runtimes that support argv-array execution (Claude Code'sBashtool, Codex CLI shell invocations, most SDK-based agents) must use that form. Runtimes that only support shell strings must apply proper shell-quoting (e.g., Node'sshell-quoteorprintf %q) before interpolation. The--separator also guarantees the query is treated as a positional argument regardless of leading characters.
Argv-array form (preferred for agent use):
["npx", "-y", "askaipods", "search", "--format", "json", "--", "<USER QUERY>"]
Shell-string form (only when argv is unavailable; the host runtime must shell-quote the query first via printf %q, Node's shell-quote, or equivalent — wrapping the raw query in double quotes is not sufficient, since $VAR and backticks still expand inside double quotes):
# <SHELL_QUOTED_QUERY> represents the user's query AFTER passing it through
# `printf %q` (or equivalent). For example, the query what's new? becomes
# the literal token what\'s\ new\? before reaching this command line.
npx -y askaipods search --format json -- <SHELL_QUOTED_QUERY>
The -y flag bypasses npm's first-run confirmation prompt; without it, a non-interactive runtime may hang on first use waiting for a TTY response that never comes (audit R7-03). The package is published on npm as askaipods, so npx -y resolves it regardless of whether the user has it installed globally. If npx is unavailable in the host environment, the user can install once with npm install -g askaipods and run askaipods directly.
The search subcommand is optional — npx -y askaipods --format json -- <SHELL_QUOTED_QUERY> works identically. Both subcommand spellings are supported; this does NOT relax the argv-array requirement above when argv execution is available — the choice is just which form reads better in context.
To restrict to recent episodes only, add --days N. When --days is passed, the server caps the value at 90 for anonymous tier and at 365 for member tier (larger values are silently clamped — do NOT pass --days 730 expecting a two-year window). When --days is omitted entirely, there is no time filter — the server returns all-time results.
npx -y askaipods search --days 90 --format json -- <SHELL_QUOTED_QUERY>
To authenticate with a PodLens API key (member tier), pass --api-key <key> or set the ASKAIPODS_API_KEY environment variable. The flag takes priority over the env var when both are present.
npx -y askaipods search --api-key pk_abc123... --format json -- <SHELL_QUOTED_QUERY>
The query must be 1–300 characters after trimming. Longer queries are rejected locally (exit code 1) before reaching the API.
Time-intent mapping (important)
When the user's query implies a time window, you MUST pass the appropriate --days value. Without it, the API returns all-time results regardless of recency words in the query.
| User intent | --days value |
|---|---|
| "recent", "latest", "最近", "current" | 90 |
| "this month", "这个月" | 30 |
| "this week", "这周", "last week" | 7 |
| "today", "yesterday", "last few days" | 3 |
| "last N days/weeks/months" | Convert N to days |
| "this quarter", "这个季度" | 90 |
| "this year", "今年" | 365 (member only; anonymous capped to 90) |
| Explicit date range (e.g. "since January") | Convert to days from today |
| No time intent (broad research) | Omit --days (all time — no cap applied) |
Do NOT silently default every query to --days 90 — omitting --days on broad research queries preserves valuable historical context that the user did not ask to exclude.
When the converted day count exceeds the tier cap (90 anonymous / 365 member), pass the cap value rather than the larger number — the server silently clamps anything above. Disclose the clamp in your response (e.g., "searched within member's 365-day cap; the user's 'last 2 years' would have meant ~730 days").
JSON shape returned by the CLI
The example below is a member-tier response. Anonymous-tier responses differ in: top-level tier: "anonymous", render_hint: "single_view", results[].date fuzzed to "YYYY-MM" precision, lower meta.quota.limit (20), and a fuller meta.restrictions object describing anonymous caps (see field notes below).
{
"tier": "member",
"query": "the user's query string",
"fetched_at": "<ISO-8601 timestamp set by the CLI at request time>",
"render_hint": "dual_view",
"results": [
{
"podcast": "Dwarkesh Patel",
"episode": "Dario Amodei on the future of AI",
"date": "2026-03-15",
"text": "the actual quote excerpt ...",
"api_rank": 1
}
],
"meta": {
"total_returned": 20,
"quota": { "used": 3, "limit": 100, "period": "daily", "next_reset": "2026-04-21T00:00:00Z" },
"restrictions": { "max_days": 365 },
"query_hash": "...",
"window": {
"requested_days": 7,
"served_days": 30,
"expanded": true,
"attempted_days": [7, 30],
"reason_code": "expanded_topk_filled"
},
"corpus_freshness": { "newest_date": "2026-04-18" },
"warning": null,
"cta": null
}
}
Field notes that affect how you render:
-
tier—memberif the user has a valid API key,anonymousotherwise. Drives the rendering branch below. On exit0,tieris always one of these two values — there is no third "unknown" path to handle (the CLI validates the upstream response and exits3if the value is missing or unexpected). -
fetched_at— ISO-8601 timestamp set by the CLI at request time (not by the server). Use it for staleness: if the user asks about the same topic again later in the session, comparefetched_atagainst the current time to decide whether to re-query or reuse the cached output. A reasonable freshness threshold is ~30 minutes for time-sensitive queries and ~2 hours for broad research. -
render_hint—dual_viewfor member,single_viewfor anonymous. Honor this. The reason: anonymous results are sorted bypublished_atdesc (newest-first) by the API, soapi_rankreflects temporal order, not semantic relevance. Showing a "Top Most Relevant" section for anonymous tier would mislead the user. Member results arrive in similarity order, soapi_rankis meaningful for relevance-based views. -
results[]— already sorted newest first by the CLI. Each result carriesapi_rank, its position in the API's original ordering. For member tier,api_rank1 = most semantically relevant — you can derive a "Top Relevant" sub-view without re-querying. For anonymous tier, the API sorts by date, soapi_rankreflects temporal order (1 = newest), not relevance — see therender_hintnote above for why a "Top Relevant" view should not be rendered for anonymous responses. -
results[].podcast/episode/date— any of these may benullif the upstream record is incomplete. RenderUnknown podcast/Untitled episode/date unknownrather than dropping the result. The CLI's own markdown renderer falls back the same way. -
results[].dateformat —YYYY-MM-DD(or full ISO timestamp) for member tier;YYYY-MMonly for anonymous tier (deliberately fuzzed by the API). Display whatever you got — don't guess a day. -
meta.quota— passed through from the podlens.net API.usedandlimitare guaranteed present (the CLI validates them as part of the success envelope);periodis typically"daily",next_resetis an ISO-8601 timestamp, andrefunded(optional boolean) — when present andtrue, the server refunded this request's quota slot under its P1-b narrow-refund rule (triggered when the corpus is stale for the requested window AND zero results were delivered). The field is often absent; check withquota.refunded === truerather thantypeof quota.refunded === "boolean". When set, mention in the response that the search didn't count against the user's quota — it's a transparency signal worth surfacing. -
meta.restrictions— for member tier, an object describing the member cap (currently{ max_days: 365 }); for anonymous tier, a fuller object describing the anonymous restrictions (e.g.,{ max_results: 20, text_truncated: false, results_randomized: false, date_precision: "month", max_days: 90, order: "published_at_desc" }). For anonymous tier, the closing anonymous-tier note (templated below) is the right way to surface the cap; for member tier, the field is informational only. Do not parse field-by-field, and do not branch tier on this field — use the top-leveltierfield. -
meta.window— present when the API includes window expansion metadata (may benullfor older server versions). When the user passes--daysand the requested window has no results, the API automatically retries with wider windows ([30, 60, 90]days). Thewindowobject contains:requested_days— what the client asked for.served_days— the last window actually attempted. Whenexpandedistrue, results came from that wider window.expanded—truewhen more than one window was attempted (regardless of whether any succeeded).attempted_days— array of every window queried, in order (e.g.[7, 30, 60]); diagnostic, safe to ignore for rendering.reason_code— one of three values, present only whenexpandedistrueANDtruncatedis absent:"expanded_topk_filled"— wider windows tried AND delivered the full topK (20)."expanded_partial_fill"— wider windows tried AND delivered some but fewer than topK results."exhausted_windows_empty"— wider windows tried AND delivered nothing.
truncated—truewhen a fallback query errored mid-expansion, aborting further windows. When present,reason_codeis suppressed.
When
expandedistrueAND results were delivered, tell the user: "No results in the requested N-day window; showing results from the last M days" (usingrequested_daysandserved_days). WhenexpandedistrueAND results are empty ANDwindow.truncatedis nottrue, the API tried all available windows and genuinely found nothing — prefer checkingmeta.warningfirst for a freshness-aware message before falling back to generic "no results" copy. Whenwindow.truncated === true, expansion was aborted mid-way by a transient Vectorize error rather than running the full window plan; tell the user to retry rather than rephrase (see the §Error handling priority ladder below for the canonical ordering). -
meta.corpus_freshness—{ "newest_date": "YYYY-MM-DD" | null }. The latestpublished_atindexed in the corpus. Use it as an honest "data as of X" signal, especially when results are empty andmeta.warningindicates a stale corpus.nullwhen the corpus-freshness probe failed server-side — render "date unknown" rather than omitting. -
meta.warning—nullin the common case. When present, an object{ "code": "..." }signalling an honest server-side explanation for an empty or partial response:"corpus_stale_for_requested_window"— the user bounded the search with--daysbut the newest indexed episode predates that window's cutoff. Tell the user: "No episodes indexed in the requested window (newest indexed episode:<corpus_freshness.newest_date>). Try a longer--daysvalue (up to your tier cap of 90 anonymous / 365 member) or omit--daysfor all-time results." Do NOT suggest rephrasing the query — the cause is freshness, not semantics."index_metadata_stale"— fresh episodes exist in the corpus but haven't propagated to the Vectorize index yet. Tell the user: "Recently indexed episodes are still propagating — retry in a few minutes."
These warnings mean an empty or near-empty result is an infrastructure signal, not a semantic-relevance signal — they take precedence over
window.expanded/truncatedmessaging when both apply. -
meta.cta— anonymous-tier call-to-action from the server (e.g.,{ follow: "https://x.com/..." }) ornull. Optional context for the closing anonymous-tier note; safe to ignore if you're already rendering the standard closing note. -
No speaker name and no episode URL. The corpus is indexed at the key-point level without per-speaker attribution (the upstream pipeline intentionally avoids attributing quotes to individuals because automatic speaker diarization is unreliable). Episode URLs are also not exposed by the public API. Render
Podcast — Episodeonly; do not fabricate "Dario said" if the text doesn't already attribute itself.
How to render the response
Output exactly this structure. It is required for consistency across runtimes — users of this skill across Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, and any other agentskills.io-compatible agent should see the same shape regardless of which agent ran it.
Note: parenthetical notes and <placeholder> tokens inside the fenced template blocks below are author guidance for the agent. Agents MUST replace placeholders with actual values from the JSON response, and MUST NOT include the parentheticals in the final user-facing output.
(Note: the CLI's own --format markdown output uses a different layout — ### N. Podcast — Episode headings — because that mode targets humans running askaipods directly in a terminal. As an agent you should always pass --format json and reformat the parsed payload yourself per the templates below; do not copy the CLI's markdown.)
Freshness banner rule (applies to every render path below, regardless of result count): before the first section heading, if meta.warning is non-null, emit a one-line italicized note:
meta.warning?.code === "corpus_stale_for_requested_window"AND results are present →*Note: The indexed corpus has no episodes in the requested window (newest indexed episode: <meta.corpus_freshness.newest_date>) — results below may come from an expanded window. Consider omitting --days for broader coverage.*meta.warning?.code === "index_metadata_stale"AND results are present →*Note: Recently indexed episodes are still propagating to the search index — some relevant matches may be missing. Retry in a few minutes for complete coverage.*meta.warning?.codeis set to any other value AND results are present (forward-compat for future server codes) →*Note: Server flagged a freshness concern with this search (code: <meta.warning.code>) — results may be incomplete.*
The banner is mandatory whenever meta.warning is non-null and the response is rendered — an unannotated partial result misrepresents the corpus state as authoritative. For empty-result renders, the equivalent freshness copy replaces the "no results" message per the §Error handling priority ladder (do not stack both).
For render_hint: "dual_view" (member tier)
## 🆕 Latest 5
1. **<podcast>** — *<episode>* · <date>
> "<quote text>"
2. ...
(continue through up to 5 of the most recent returned results — when the response carries fewer than 5 results (partial fills are possible when `window.reason_code` is `"expanded_partial_fill"`, when a freshness warning fires, or simply when the corpus is sparse for the query), render whichever exist and drop the "5" from the heading; do NOT pad or fabricate. The first 5 in the `results` array are the right slice since the CLI already sorted by date desc.)
## 🎯 Top 5 Most Relevant
1. **<podcast>** — *<episode>* · <date>
> "<quote text>"
2. ...
(these are the results with `api_rank` 1 through 5, regardless of date — render whichever exist (when the server returns fewer than 5 results overall, this section will have fewer too; drop the "5" from the heading in that case). Pull them from the `results` array by filtering on `api_rank`.
**Then sort ascending by `api_rank`** so rank 1 appears first — the `results` array is sorted newest-first, so a naive filter without re-sorting would leave these in date order instead of rank order.)
## 💡 Insights
- <bullet 1>
- <bullet 2>
- <bullet 3>
- (3-5 bullets total — see Insights guidelines below)
If the same result appears in both Latest and Top Relevant sections, that's fine and informative (it means a recent quote is also semantically central) — show it in both. Do not deduplicate.
For render_hint: "single_view" (anonymous tier)
## 🆕 Recent Quotes
1. **<podcast>** — *<episode>* · <date>
> "<quote text>"
2. ...
(all returned results, in `results` array order which is already newest-first; expect up to 20)
## 💡 Insights
- <bullet 1>
- <bullet 2>
- <bullet 3>
---
*Anonymous tier: up to 20 results sorted newest-first, dates fuzzed to month, `--days` capped at 90 when specified. Set `ASKAIPODS_API_KEY` for 100 searches/day, full dates, and `--days` up to 365 (or omit for all-time) — member tier is invite-only, request access at https://podlens.net.*
The closing note about the anonymous tier matters because it tells the user (a) why the dates are coarse, (b) what the lookback cap is, and (c) what the upgrade path is. Skipping it leaves the user wondering why dates lack day precision.
Insights guidelines
The Insights section is the most valuable part of your response — it is what differentiates this skill from a raw API call. The user could read 20 quotes themselves; what they cannot easily do is spot the patterns across the 20. That is your job.
Write 3-5 bullets, each one concrete and one sentence long. Cover at least three of these dimensions:
- Common themes — what idea, framing, or concept is repeating across multiple quotes? Be specific: "three guests describe X as a 'phase transition'" beats "people are excited about X".
- Temporal trend — is the conversation accelerating, shifting, or fading? Are recent quotes saying something different from older ones in the same set?
- Notable podcasts or episodes — which shows are over-represented? An over-representation often signals which community is most engaged with the topic. (You cannot identify individual speakers, but you can identify which podcasts the topic clusters in.)
- Disagreements — do quotes contradict each other? Where are the live debates?
- What's missing — what obvious angle, counter-argument, or stakeholder voice is conspicuously absent from the returned results? Gaps are signals too.
What to avoid:
- Generic observations like "people are excited about AI" — the user could write that themselves.
- Restating individual quotes — the user already sees the quotes above.
- Confident claims about who said what — the API does not return speaker names; do not invent attribution.
- Bullet points that exceed one sentence — the goal is dense pattern-recognition, not paragraphs.
Error handling
The CLI uses stable exit codes so you can branch on the failure mode:
| Exit code | Meaning | What to tell the user |
|---|---|---|
0 | Success | Render the results normally |
1 | Usage error / invalid arguments / API key rejected | Surface the stderr message verbatim — it will be a clear actionable error. Common causes: query exceeds 300 characters (shorten it), empty query, or API key rejected by the server. |
2 | Daily quota exhausted | Surface the CLI's stderr message verbatim — it is already tier-aware (distinct copy for member vs anonymous) and includes the correct reset time and upgrade path. |
3 | Transient or unexpected failure (network error, rate-limit burst, service 503, protocol/shape error, or internal exception) | Retry once after a brief pause. If it fails again, surface the CLI's stderr message verbatim — it distinguishes "rate limited, retry in a minute" from "podlens.net temporarily unavailable" from "unexpected response shape" from internal exceptions, so the user sees the actionable detail. |
If the results array is empty (zero matches above the similarity threshold), check the honesty signals in this priority order — freshness warnings dominate because they tell the user something stronger than "rephrase your query". meta.warning and meta.window are both nullable (the server omits either when not applicable), so use optional chaining (?.) when implementing these checks — absent fields must fall through to step 6 rather than throwing:
meta.warning?.code === "corpus_stale_for_requested_window"— corpus has no indexed episodes in the requested window. Tell the user: "No episodes indexed in the requested window (newest indexed episode:<meta.corpus_freshness.newest_date>). Try a longer--daysvalue (up to your tier cap of 90 anonymous / 365 member) or omit--daysfor all-time results." Do NOT suggest rephrasing the query.meta.warning?.code === "index_metadata_stale"— fresh episodes exist but haven't propagated to the vector index. Tell the user: "Recently indexed episodes are still propagating to the search index — retry in a few minutes."meta.warning?.codeis set to any other value (forward-compat for future server codes) — preserve the signal rather than falling through. Tell the user: "No results. The server flagged a freshness issue with this search (code:<meta.warning.code>) — results may be incomplete or the requested window may be stale. Try omitting--daysor retry in a few minutes."meta.window?.truncated === true— the expansion was interrupted by a transient error. Tell the user to retry in a moment.meta.window?.expanded === true— the API widened the window (e.g., 7→30 days) and still found nothing. Tell the user: "No quotes found. The API expanded the search from N to M days but found no matches. Try rephrasing or broadening the query." Ifmeta.corpus_freshness?.newest_dateis present, append "(corpus indexed through<newest_date>)" as an honest data-freshness signal.- Otherwise (no warning, no expansion): say "No quotes found for that topic. The corpus is AI-focused — for non-AI topics, try a web search instead. For AI topics, try rephrasing or broadening the query."
If meta.quota.refunded === true, add a one-line note at the end: "This search was refunded — it did not count against your daily quota." (The server's P1-b narrow-refund rule fires when the corpus is stale for the requested window AND zero results are delivered.)
Do not invent quotes to fill the gap.
Never silently swallow an error. Never fabricate quotes when the API returns nothing.
Honest limitations to set user expectations
- No speaker attribution. The API returns "podcast + episode + quote text" but not "who said it". The upstream pipeline avoids per-speaker attribution because automatic speaker diarization is unreliable — surfacing wrong attribution would be worse than no attribution.
- No episode URLs. The public API does not expose direct links to episodes. Users who want to listen will need to search the podcast and episode title in their podcast app of choice.
- AI-focused corpus. Coverage is dense for AI research, ML engineering, AI investing, and AI policy. Coverage for unrelated topics is sparse and noisy.
- Short quote excerpts, not transcripts. Each result is one extracted "key point" from an episode, typically 1-3 sentences. For long-form context, the user will need to listen.
These limitations are not bugs — surfacing them honestly is better than the user discovering them mid-task and losing trust.