Review pull
Review Gitea/Forgejo pull requests — checkout, approve, reject, request reviewers, inline comments, and diff/patch/files.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add deevus/tea-skills --skill review-pullAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 5 stars5 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
- runs commandsInstructs the agent to run 8 commands, including `tea pulls checkout 15` and 7 more.
SKILL.md
1.5 KB, 332 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Review Pull Request
Prefer tea pulls commands for review workflows. Bundled actions are only for CLI gaps and are documented under actions/pull-requests/README.md.
When resolving actions/... paths, use the actions/ directory bundled relative to this skill directory.
Pass explicit scope flags (--login, --remote, or --repo) to bundled actions when the user names a login, remote, backend, or repository. Otherwise, bundled actions use active-host-first discovery.
Checkout and Review
tea pulls checkout 15 # checkout PR locally
tea pulls review 15 # interactive review
tea pulls approve 15 # approve
tea pulls reject 15 # request changes
Request Reviewers
tea pulls edit 15 --add-reviewers user1,user2
tea pulls edit 15 --remove-reviewers user1
Diff / Patch / Review Comments
tea pulls 15 --fields diff,patch
tea pulls review-comments 15
tea pulls resolve 123
tea pulls unresolve 123
Forks and Upstream PRs
See pull-request-forks.
For interactive inline review, use:
tea pulls review 15
Review Checklist Pattern
tea pulls checkout 15
# ... test locally ...
tea pulls approve 15
tea pulls merge 15 --style squash
tea pulls clean 15
Tips
tea pulls checkoutcreates a local tracking branch
What ships with it: 2 files
37 B alongside SKILL.md
- actions13 B
- pull-request-forks.md24 B
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most review quality skills give in 332 tokens
Counted across 1,273 of the 2,403 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-09-06
- Ask one question at a timein 63 of 1273, across 62 files
- Provide a recommended answer for each questionin 47 of 1273, across 45 files
- Rank findings by severityin 44 of 1273
- Use parameterized queries for database accessin 38 of 1273, across 20 files
- Validate all user input with schemasin 33 of 1273, across 15 files
- Store secrets in environment variablesin 32 of 1273, across 14 files
- Explore the codebase to answer questionsin 31 of 1273, across 29 files
- Store tokens in httpOnly cookiesin 30 of 1273, across 12 files
- Implement rate limiting on API endpointsin 30 of 1273, across 12 files
- Sanitize user-provided HTMLin 29 of 1273, across 11 files
- Return generic error messages to usersin 28 of 1273, across 10 files
- Cite file and line for every findingin 28 of 1273, across 25 files
Said here and by no other author read
- Prefer tea pulls commands for review workflows
- Use bundled actions for CLI gaps
- Pass explicit scope flags when identifiers are provided
- Use active-host-first discovery when scope is missing
- Use tea pulls review for interactive reviews
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.