Issue orchestrator

Issue orchestrator (strike-cli)

You coordinate many issues. You do not implement feature code in the primary checkout. Each shippable unit is owned by an issue-handler agent (or you acting as handler for a single issue) inside its own git worktree.

When to use

• User asks to orchestrate / farm / drain open issues
• User wants parallel agents on the backlog
• After filing a wave of issues and wanting them driven to main

Source of truth

gh issue list --state open --limit 100
gh issue view N
gh pr list --state open
git fetch origin main
git worktree list

Issue body headers (machine-readable)

Issues should start with:

wave: N
depends: none | #a #b
blocks: none | #c #d
conflicts: none | #e #f
priority: bugs-first | feature

Field	Meaning
wave	Lower ships first. Wave 0 = bugs/tests baseline.
depends	All listed issues must be CLOSED before start
conflicts	Do not run in parallel with these (shared files / same agent)
blocks	What this unlocks (scheduling hint)
priority	bugs-first before feature within the same wave

Closed depends count as satisfied.

Missing headers: treat as wave: 99, depends: none, conflicts: none, priority: feature. Prefer issues that have proper headers. When farming, comment once on headerless issues asking for headers (or load issue-create-and-handle to refine) before parallel dispatch — do not guess large parallel graphs.

Suggested conflicts hotspots

Serialize (or mark mutual conflicts) when multiple issues touch:

• internal/tui/_src/app/keymap*.go, default keybinds, internal/config/keybinds.go
• internal/engine/turn.go / core turn loop
• internal/tool/registry.go + defer/toolsearch wiring
• internal/protocol event kind additions shared across frontends

Prefer explicit conflicts: #N on the issue over silent collision.

Sibling skills

Skill	Role
issue-handler	One issue → worktree → implement → test → PR → review-agent loop → CI → merge → cleanup
test-and-validate	Verification report format + tiers
write-go-tests	Tests when handler implements
smoke	Product happy-path when user-visible
release	Version tags (orchestrator does not cut releases unless asked)
tui-components	TUI work inside a handler

Orchestrator dispatches handlers; handlers load domain skills.

Priority order

1. Wave 0 (priority: bugs-first / test gaps) until none remain open
2. Lowest open wave with depends satisfied
3. Within a wave: bugs-first, then issues that unlock the most open blocks, then lowest number

Do not start large features while wave-0 bugs that touch the same surface are open, unless the user overrides.

Conflict rules

• If A lists B under conflicts (or vice versa), at most one of A/B may be in-progress (open PR or active worktree) at a time.
• Same package hotspots without headers: serialize when both touch keymap/default binds or engine/turn.go heavily — prefer explicit conflicts on new issues.
• Multi-issue “cluster” (e.g. all keymap bugs): one worktree / one handler for the whole cluster when they conflict with each other.
• Parallelism cap defaults to 4, but the conflict graph wins — fewer slots when hotspots overlap.

Ready set

An issue is ready when all are true:

• state OPEN
• every depends issue is CLOSED (or not listed)
• none of conflicts are in-progress (open PR titled/body Fixes #N, or worktree branch worktree-*N* / clearly for that issue)
• wave is the current minimum eligible wave (or user pinned this issue)
• no open PR already fixing it (attach/babysit that PR instead of duplicating)

Dispatch

For each ready issue (up to the parallelism cap / conflict graph):

1. Spawn or instruct an agent to load issue-handler with the issue number.
2. Handler must: worktree off origin/main, implement, tests per AGENTS.md, tier gate, PR Fixes #N, review loop, CI, merge, cleanup.
3. Orchestrator tracks: issue → branch → PR URL → status (queued / in_progress / review / merged / blocked).

Do not implement production code in the primary checkout as the orchestrator.

Orchestrator loop

loop:
  1. Refresh issues, PRs, worktrees, origin/main
  2. Build ready set
  3. Fill free slots with highest-priority ready issues
  4. For in-flight PRs: ensure handler/review/CI progress; re-dispatch handler if stalled
  5. On merge: mark done, unlock dependents, pull main awareness
  6. On block: comment on issue, mark blocked, free the slot
  7. Exit when no open issues left, or user stops, or only blocked remain

Stalls

• CI red > reasonable time → handler fixes or orchestrator assigns handler to that PR
• Review loop hits stall ceiling (5) → stop-and-ask per issue-handler
• Merge conflict with main → handler merges origin/main in worktree
• Ambiguous product decision → comment on issue + stop that lane

Reporting

Lead with board status:

Wave 0: done | in flight | blocked
Ready: #N #M
In flight: #N → PR URL
Blocked: #N (reason)
Next: #N (why)

Do not claim “all green” without gh pr checks / issue state.

Hard rules

1. Bugs/tests (wave: 0, bugs-first) before features when both are open.
2. Never parallelize conflicts.
3. Never duplicate an existing open PR for the same issue.
4. Never force-push main; never commit secrets.
5. Handlers own merge gates (review + CI); orchestrator does not merge over failing checks.
6. .plan/ is optional research for handlers — orchestrator schedules GitHub issues, not the whole roadmap file.
7. Stop-and-ask when gh auth fails, user must choose between conflicting product directions, or only blocked issues remain.

What this skill is not

• Not a substitute for issue-handler on a single issue (use handler directly)
• Not an implementer of unscoped .plan/features.md items without issues
• Not a requirement to max out parallel agents if conflicts forbid it