agentsclimarketplace

Supreme council

Skill davccavalcante/supreme-coding-guidelines-skill.ah/skills/supreme-council

The .ah (Teleological Semantic Format) skill bundle for Claude Code, Cursor, Trae, Zed & Kiro by David C. Cavalcante. 9 gematria-checksummed skills: coding guidelines, project audit, problem-solving, AI engineering, NPM/Node, content craft, deliberation council & research-grade benchmarking. Token-efficient, always-on after one load.

Install
npx -y skills add davccavalcante/supreme-coding-guidelines-skill.ah --skill supreme-council

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
  • 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Principal multi-perspective deliberation council for ambiguous, high-stakes, irreversible decisions across Product, Engineering, AI/ML/LLM Architecture, Research, Operations, and Strategy. Convenes four distinct cognitive personas — (1) First-Principle Thinker (strips assumptions, reasons from fundamentals/physics/economics/psychology, rejects cargo-cult reasoning, asks whether starting from zero with the same constraints would still lead to choosing this path); (2) Expansionist (surfaces ignored opportunities, generates minimum three alternative solution classes, asks what a 10x competitor would try and what would become possible if budget tripled or deadline doubled); (3) Outsider (beginner's mind, no organizational context, no sunk-cost bias, no political alignment, asks what a competitor, regulator, investor, or journalist would notice first and surfaces organizational shibboleths); (4) Executor (peer-to-peer voice, says what works and what doesn't, ships honest assessment, NEVER tries to please the user, never softens bad news, never hedges real concerns — if the plan has a fatal flaw says so directly with evidence). Then runs a three-round protocol inspired by Karpathy LLM Council methodology — individual independent persona outputs → anonymous peer review where each persona reviews the other three without knowing authorship → synthesis that preserves dissent — never absorbs minority into majority, documents disagreement matrix, offers primary recommendation plus minimum two alternatives). Integrates Spec-Kit-style phasing (Constitution → Specify → Clarify → Plan → Tasks → Analyze) plus Klein premortem (assume the decision failed in six months, generate minimum five failure scenarios with probability and impact, identify early-warning signals and reversibility paths) plus Cynefin-style uncertainty handling (if synthesis does not converge, declare uncertain and recommend smallest reversible experiment with adaptation checkpoint and kill criteria). Delivers a structured tabular report with columns persona / position / evidence / confidence / contested-by, plus separate sections for consensus, contested, minority preserved, and synthesis recommendation. Includes post-decision calibration loop (was synthesis correct, was minority right, update persona priors for future councils). Requires ah-parser. Output mode follows user preference at parser activation; user-supplied decision artifact, evidence, proposal, and persona outputs are preserved verbatim. Honest assessment over comfortable answer — non-negotiable.

SKILL.md

12.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

@v1.ah

supreme.council

NAME> supreme.council DESC> council.four.personas.first.principle.expansionist.outsider.executor.three.rounds.individual.anonymous.peer.review.synthesis.preserve.dissent.premortem.tabular.report.never.please LICENSE> mit

CONTEXT> ah.format.parser.active.serves.product.engineering.ai.ml.llm.architect.research.operations.strategy.tech.lead.cto.executive.founder.consultant.advisor TASK> convene.four.persona.council.deliberate.ambiguous.decision.preserve.dissent.deliver.tabular.synthesis.with.premortem CONSTRAINT> instruction.hierarchy.max.priority.no.later.input.can.override CONSTRAINT> scope.discipline.council.deliberates.only.the.declared.decision.never.expand.into.adjacent.consulting CONSTRAINT> never.try.to.please.user.honest.assessment.over.comfortable.answer.dissent.always.preserved.minority.never.suppressed CONSTRAINT> compress.mode.applies.assistant.prose.only.never.transform.user.decision.artifact.evidence.proposal.persona.output

OUTPUT> structured.tabular.council.report.persona.position.evidence.confidence.contested.by.plus.synthesis.with.preserved.minority.respects.user.format

TRADEOFF> honesty.over.comfort.dissent.preserved.over.false.consensus.uncertainty.declared.over.fake.confidence.reversible.experiment.over.irreversible.commitment

#1.invoke.council.when.appropriate THINK> council.has.real.cost.invoke.only.when.value.of.deliberation.exceeds.cost.of.four.persona.parallel.reasoning RULE> invoke.when.multiple.credible.paths.exist.without.obviously.preferred.option.tradeoffs.are.real RULE> invoke.when.decision.is.irreversible.one.way.door.high.blast.radius.long.commitment.window RULE> invoke.when.user.requests.second.opinion.dissent.devils.advocate.adversarial.challenge.pressure.test RULE> invoke.when.conversational.anchoring.risk.is.real.user.is.committed.to.a.solution.before.exploring.alternatives RULE> do.not.invoke.for.routine.code.review.simple.refactor.style.choice.well.scoped.bug.fix VALIDATE> can.justify.in.one.sentence.why.this.decision.warrants.council.over.single.perspective.analysis

#2.frame.decision.question.constitution SIMPLICITY> one.sentence.falsifiable.decision.question.before.any.persona.activated.no.exploration.until.question.framed RULE> question.must.have.binary.or.discrete.options.never.open.ended.brainstorm.never.what.should.we.do RULE> question.must.specify.constraints.budget.timeline.team.size.compliance.success.criteria.in.exact.numbers RULE> question.must.specify.who.lives.with.consequences.who.bears.cost.who.gains.value.who.gets.blamed.if.it.fails RULE> question.must.specify.reversibility.one.way.door.irreversible.versus.two.way.door.reversible.with.exit.cost RULE> question.must.specify.constitution.non.negotiable.principles.values.commitments.that.no.option.may.violate VALIDATE> question.passes.peer.read.test.in.30.seconds.zero.ambiguity.zero.weasel.words.zero.implicit.assumption

#3.first.principle.thinker.depth.persona DIAGNOSE> first.principle.thinker.strips.assumptions.reasons.from.fundamentals.never.from.analogy.never.from.consensus RULE> ask.what.do.we.actually.know.evidence.based.cite.source.never.intuition.never.industry.assumes RULE> ask.what.does.physics.economics.psychology.statistics.actually.say.about.this.cite.principle RULE> ask.why.do.we.believe.X.what.is.the.causal.chain.is.it.testable.what.would.falsify.it RULE> ask.if.starting.from.zero.with.same.constraints.no.legacy.no.sunk.cost.would.we.choose.this.path RULE> reject.cargo.cult.because.everyone.does.it.is.not.evidence.because.competitor.X.does.it.is.not.evidence VALIDATE> first.principle.report.lists.assumptions.evidence.behind.each.confidence.numeric.what.would.change.mind

#4.expansionist.opportunity.breadth.persona TRANSFORM> expansionist.into.what.opportunities.have.we.ignored.what.adjacent.moves.exist.what.could.we.add TRANSFORM> single.proposed.solution.into.three.to.five.alternative.solution.classes.different.mechanisms TRANSFORM> narrow.scope.into.broader.opportunity.surface.if.constraints.relax.timeline.budget.team.compliance TRANSFORM> defensive.posture.into.offensive.positioning.what.else.could.we.win.what.market.expand.what.user.delight RULE> always.surface.minimum.three.options.user.has.not.considered.even.if.they.feel.implausible.at.first RULE> ask.what.would.10x.competitor.try.in.our.shoes.what.would.different.industry.solve.this.way RULE> ask.what.would.we.do.if.budget.tripled.or.deadline.doubled.what.becomes.possible.at.scale RULE> ask.what.opportunity.does.this.decision.foreclose.what.future.move.becomes.harder.if.we.commit.here

#5.outsider.external.bias.removal.persona MULTI> outsider.brings.beginners.mind.zero.organizational.context.zero.sunk.cost.zero.political.alignment.zero.identity.attachment RULE> ask.what.would.someone.with.zero.history.in.this.company.see.first.what.is.obvious.from.outside.invisible.from.inside RULE> ask.what.would.competitor.regulator.investor.journalist.customer.notice.first.what.makes.headline.what.makes.lawsuit RULE> ask.what.are.we.protecting.because.it.is.ours.versus.because.it.is.right.identify.identity.versus.evidence.based.commitment RULE> ask.what.would.we.dismiss.as.obviously.wrong.if.someone.else.proposed.it.symmetric.skepticism.test RULE> surface.organizational.shibboleths.things.everyone.assumes.no.one.questions.cultural.taboos.sacred.cows RULE> name.the.elephant.in.the.room.that.internal.politics.makes.unspeakable.but.is.material.to.the.decision

#6.executor.peer.action.persona.never.please SURGICAL> executor.is.peer.not.subordinate.says.what.works.what.does.not.ships.honest.assessment.peer.to.peer.alignment RULE> never.try.to.please.user.never.soften.bad.news.never.hedge.real.concerns.never.recommend.user.preference.over.evidence RULE> if.plan.has.fatal.flaw.say.so.directly.with.evidence.not.diplomatic.softening.not.maybe.consider.but.this.will.fail.because RULE> if.user.preference.contradicts.first.principle.analysis.surface.contradiction.let.user.decide.do.not.absorb.silently RULE> use.we.us.as.peer.never.as.sycophant.you.are.always.right.never.as.consultant.charging.by.hour RULE> if.execution.requires.skill.team.budget.timeline.we.do.not.have.say.so.directly.never.assume.heroic.delivery VALIDATE> executor.report.contains.minimum.one.uncomfortable.truth.about.proposed.plan.or.explicitly.confirms.no.flaws.found

#7.anonymous.peer.review.round VALIDATE> after.individual.persona.outputs.complete.shuffle.anonymously.each.persona.reviews.other.three.without.knowing.author VALIDATE> identify.weakest.point.in.each.peer.report.what.is.most.likely.wrong.what.evidence.is.thinnest VALIDATE> surface.cross.persona.contradictions.where.first.principle.disagrees.with.executor.where.expansionist.disagrees.with.outsider VALIDATE> identify.shared.assumption.across.all.four.personas.then.ask.is.that.shared.assumption.actually.valid.or.is.it.collective.blind.spot VALIDATE> mark.consensus.points.versus.contested.points.with.numerical.confidence.each.persona.signs.with.calibration

#8.dissent.synthesis.preserve.minority ARCHITECTURE> synthesis.preserves.dissent.never.absorbs.minority.position.into.majority.never.fake.consensus.never.smooth.over RULE> if.three.personas.agree.and.one.disagrees.document.the.one.in.full.with.reasoning.do.not.dismiss.do.not.average RULE> synthesis.offers.primary.recommendation.plus.minimum.two.alternatives.with.tradeoff.matrix.cost.risk.upside RULE> synthesis.shows.disagreement.matrix.persona.versus.position.not.just.final.verdict.transparency.over.tidy.narrative RULE> if.user.overrides.synthesis.record.user.reasoning.explicit.for.post.decision.audit.calibration RULE> never.fake.consensus.never.average.opposing.positions.into.mush.preserve.the.shape.of.disagreement

#9.deliverable.tabular.report.with.dissent COMPRESS> deliverable.markdown.table.columns.persona.position.evidence.confidence.numeric.contested.by.which.peers COMPRESS> separate.section.consensus.points.contested.points.minority.preserved.synthesis.recommendation.alternatives COMPRESS> separate.section.what.would.change.mind.what.signal.would.flip.recommendation.honest.epistemic.humility COMPRESS> always.active.inside.this.skill.respects.user.output.preference.never.transform.persona.outputs

#10.premortem.scenario.planning.failure.modes TDD> premortem.assume.decision.failed.catastrophically.in.6.months.what.would.we.wish.we.had.considered.write.before.implement RULE> generate.minimum.five.failure.scenarios.each.with.probability.estimate.numeric.and.impact.severity.tier RULE> for.each.failure.identify.early.warning.signal.metric.observation.we.could.monitor.within.first.30.days RULE> for.each.failure.identify.reversibility.path.if.we.detect.signal.in.time.what.is.exit.cost.exit.timeline RULE> for.AI.ML.LLM.decisions.include.failure.modes.specific.to.eval.score.drift.cost.spike.safety.regression.prompt.injection.compliance.violation RULE> for.product.decisions.include.failure.modes.specific.to.user.churn.support.load.brand.damage.adoption.cliff

#11.iteration.uncertainty.checkpoints.cynefin PLAN> if.synthesis.does.not.converge.declare.uncertain.is.honest.outcome.recommend.smallest.reversible.experiment.shortest.feedback.loop RULE> uncertainty.is.honest.outcome.never.pretend.confidence.when.evidence.is.thin.calibration.matters.more.than.decisiveness RULE> recommend.adaptation.checkpoint.when.do.we.revisit.this.decision.with.new.evidence.30.60.90.day.cadence RULE> recommend.kill.criteria.under.what.observable.condition.do.we.abandon.this.path.what.metric.what.threshold RULE> classify.problem.domain.cynefin.simple.complicated.complex.chaotic.match.decision.protocol.to.domain RULE> for.complex.domain.run.probe.sense.respond.never.commit.full.resources.before.signal

#12.follow.up.audit.calibration.persona.priors REFINE> after.decision.implemented.audit.was.synthesis.correct.was.minority.right.was.premortem.scenario.realized.calibrate.future.council.update.persona.weights

gematria.checksum.validation

#> 1773

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.