Proposal tracker
Claude Code & Codex skills for AI reports, decks and client sharing: publish agent-made research as live tracked web reports, recurring client reports, view-tracked proposals and slide decks via the ReportRoom MCP. Beautiful by default, analytics back to the agent.
npx -y skills add dashaworks/report-skills --skill proposal-trackerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 27 days oldThe repository was created 27 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 9 stars9 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Publish a proposal, offer, or pitch as a tracked link and report back whether it's getting read (view analytics after sending). Use when the user says "send the proposal", "did they open it", "track whether they read it", "share the offer". Not for recurring client reports (use client-reporter) or general research shares (use report-publisher).
SKILL.md
3.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Proposal Tracker
The DocSend move, agent-native: publish the proposal as a live tracked page, then answer the question every sender actually has — "is it getting read?" — with view data instead of silence.
Follow the shared flow in the root SKILL.md. Proposals are maximally client-facing: approval gate always on, and double-check pricing numbers at the gate.
When to use
- The user has a proposal, quote, offer, statement of work, or pitch to send to a specific recipient
- The user asks about engagement on something already sent ("did they open it?") → go straight to
get_analytics
Steps
- Confirm the essentials before authoring. Recipient (company/person), the offer's core numbers (price, timeline, scope), and the desired next step (call booked? signature? reply?). A proposal without an explicit next step is a brochure.
- Structure for a skimming decision-maker. One-line summary of the offer up top; the "why us / why now" in one short section; scope and pricing in scannable tables; the call to action visible without scrolling far. Long context goes in an appendix.
- Author + lint + approval gate. At the gate, read back the price, timeline, and scope numbers explicitly — a typo in a published price is the worst failure mode this skill has. Note too that the page carries a small "Published with ReportRoom" footer credit the recipient will see.
- Publish with a clean slug. Return the URL and remind the user the link is tracked. When a proposal is dead or superseded, offer to
unpublishit — the link then returns 410 Gone and the plan slot frees up (republishbrings it back if the deal reopens). - The follow-up loop is the point. Offer to check views (
get_analytics) after a day or two and translate the signal into next actions: viewed-but-no-reply calls for a different follow-up than never-opened. Suggest the follow-up message to match. Be precise about what the data can say: for a published proposal it's view counts by day, not per-person opens — if one recipient got the link, views ≈ their opens; if it was shared around, it's aggregate. If the user needs to know which named person read what, that's a data room (see below), whereget_room_analyticsreports per-viewer, per-document opens and dwell.
Hard rules
- Never publish a proposal without the user confirming the price and scope verbatim at the approval gate.
- Analytics are a signal for the user, not the recipient — never expose tracking detail on the page itself beyond what ReportRoom discloses.
- If the user wants access control ("only they should see it"), match the tool to the need instead of publishing openly and hoping:
- A published proposal is unlisted — a hard-to-guess slug on your handle — but not gated. Anyone with the link can open it, and analytics are aggregate.
- A data room (Business plan, see the root
SKILL.md) gates it properly:passcodeor per-emailallowlistaccess, an NDA to accept, an expiry date, watermarking, instant revocation, and per-viewer engagement. Offer this whenever the answer to "who exactly saw this?" matters. - If they need gating but aren't on Business, say so plainly and let them choose — upgrade, or send unlisted with eyes open. Don't imply a published link is protected when it isn't.
- Invite links from
grant_room_accessare shown once and are not emailed by ReportRoom. Hand the link to the user to send. Don't email a prospect on their behalf unless they explicitly ask you to.