Quality review
Skill cynco-labs/ai-accounting-skills/accounting-engagement/skills/quality-review
Prove the pack before finalisation — full QC with Section A mathematical blockers. Use when quality review, QC, partner checklist, "check the accounts", or prove intent before issue.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add cynco-labs/ai-accounting-skills --skill quality-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 2 stars2 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
SKILL.md
2.8 KB, 645 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
/quality-review
Purpose
Independent checklist pass before anything is called final. Main job: prove.
Load shared/guardrails.md and execute every item in
references/qc_checklist.md (plugin or repo root shim).
Preconditions
- Active engagement on disk (
engagement_state.json). - Adjusted TB present when FS claimed —
roll_tbderived, not freestyle. - Re-read workpapers/FS if context was compacted (disk is truth).
Steps
1 — Section A mathematical integrity [BLOCKERS]
Run every Section A check in references/qc_checklist.md against artifacts on disk.
| Check | Pass when |
|---|---|
| TB DR = CR | tb_adjusted.json (or claimed TB) difference 0 |
| BS balances | Assets = liabilities + equity |
| P&L ↔ RE | RE movement ties to profit and distributions |
| Each JE balances | Period + YE journals |
| Bank GL = recon | Diff 0.00 per bank or with limitation logged |
| Cash flow ↔ cash | Net CF explains cash movement |
Done when: every Section A item is Pass, or any Fail is written and finalisation is blocked.
2 — Sections B–E
Execute Data integrity, Standards, Completeness, Format from the same checklist. Material fails → queries or fix list; do not silent-pass.
Standards-aware classify (prove):
If classify_depth is standards_aware or engagement_type is year_end / compilation:
- Material money-in without
workpapers/analysis/revenue_recognition.md→ Fail C6b or documented with limitation - Material capex candidates without
workpapers/analysis/capital_vs_expense.md→ Fail C6c or with limitation - Analysis conclusions must not contradict coded
transactions.jsonwithout an open query
Done when: every checklist row has Pass / Fail / N/A with evidence path.
3 — Report + state
Write QC report under the engagement (e.g. workpapers/qc_report.md or firm path).
Update engagement_state.json: prove stage result; must stop if any Section A Fail.
Done when: report on disk and state reflects pass or blocker.
Gates
- Any Section A Fail → cannot finalise (blocker).
- Provenance gaps on material figures → Fail Section B, not a soft skip.
Failure modes
| Failure | Behavior |
|---|---|
| Agent scores from memory | Re-open TB / BS / recon files; re-run checks |
| TB freestyled in chat | Reject; require roll_tb artifact |
| Premature “QC passed” | Exhaustive bar: every checklist row statused |
Output
QC report Pass/Fail per item. Next: finalise-accounts only if Section A clean (and firm policy).
Trust surface
Engagement folder + firm config. No external send.
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.