agentsclimarketplace

Code complexity scanner

Skill ComeOnOliver/skillshub/skills/TerminalSkills/skills/code-complexity-scanner

🧠 The right skill, one API call. AI agent skills registry with token-efficient skill resolution. 5,000+ skills from 500+ top repos.From the repository description

Install
npx -y skills add ComeOnOliver/skillshub --skill code-complexity-scanner

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

4.2 KB, ~1.1k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Code Complexity Scanner

Overview

This skill analyzes source code to measure cyclomatic complexity, cognitive complexity, and function length. It identifies the most complex functions and files in a codebase, helping teams focus refactoring efforts on the code that's hardest to maintain and most likely to harbor bugs.

Instructions

Step 1: Identify Target Language and Files

Detect the primary language from file extensions and package files. Filter to source code only (exclude node_modules, vendor, dist, build, pycache, .git).

Step 2: Measure Cyclomatic Complexity

For each function/method, count:

  • if, elif/else if β†’ +1 each
  • for, while, do-while β†’ +1 each
  • case in switch (each case) β†’ +1 each
  • catch β†’ +1
  • &&, || in conditions β†’ +1 each
  • Ternary ?: β†’ +1
  • Base complexity starts at 1

Step 3: Measure Cognitive Complexity

More nuanced than cyclomatic β€” penalizes nesting:

  • Each control flow break: +1
  • Each nesting level: +1 additional per level
  • Recursion: +1
  • Boolean operator sequences that switch: +1

Step 4: Identify Hotspot Files

Rank files by:

  1. Maximum function complexity in the file
  2. Average complexity across all functions
  3. Number of functions above threshold (default: 15)
  4. Total lines of code

Step 5: Output Report

Present findings in three tiers:

  • πŸ”΄ Critical (complexity > 25): Must refactor β€” these functions are untestable
  • 🟑 Warning (complexity 15-25): Should refactor when next modifying
  • 🟒 OK (complexity < 15): Acceptable maintainability

Examples

Example 1: TypeScript Project Scan

User prompt:

Scan src/ for the most complex functions

Agent output:

Complexity Report β€” src/ (89 files scanned)

πŸ”΄ CRITICAL (complexity > 25)
  src/billing/calculator.ts
    calculateInvoiceTotal()     Cyclomatic: 34  Cognitive: 48  Lines: 180
    applyDiscountRules()        Cyclomatic: 26  Cognitive: 31  Lines: 95

  src/api/middleware/auth.ts
    validateAndRefreshToken()   Cyclomatic: 28  Cognitive: 35  Lines: 120

🟑 WARNING (complexity 15-25)
  src/workers/sync.ts
    reconcileRecords()          Cyclomatic: 19  Cognitive: 24  Lines: 88
  src/utils/validators.ts
    validateAddress()           Cyclomatic: 16  Cognitive: 18  Lines: 65

Summary:
  Files scanned: 89 | Functions analyzed: 412
  Average complexity: 6.8 | Median: 4
  Functions above threshold: 14 (3.4%)
  Recommended target: reduce critical functions below 15

Example 2: Python Project with Trend

User prompt:

What are the complexity hotspots in our Django app?

Agent output:

Complexity Hotspots β€” myapp/ (67 files)

Top 10 by Cyclomatic Complexity:
  Rank  Function                              CC   Lines  File
  1     process_order()                       38   340    views/checkout.py
  2     generate_report()                     27   210    reports/builder.py
  3     sync_inventory()                      24   180    tasks/inventory.py
  4     parse_import_file()                   22   150    importers/csv.py
  5     calculate_shipping()                  19   95     shipping/rates.py

Nesting depth violations (>4 levels):
  views/checkout.py:142    β€” 6 levels deep in process_order()
  reports/builder.py:89    β€” 5 levels deep in generate_report()

Recommended refactoring order: process_order() first (highest complexity,
most changed file per git history, 340 lines is 3x recommended max).

Guidelines

  • Thresholds are configurable β€” default 15 works for most teams, but ask the user if they have a team standard
  • Cognitive > cyclomatic for human readability β€” cognitive complexity better captures how hard code is to understand
  • Context matters β€” a parser with complexity 20 might be acceptable; a controller with complexity 20 needs splitting
  • Combine with change frequency β€” complex code that never changes is less urgent than complex code edited weekly
  • Don't count generated code β€” exclude auto-generated files, migrations, and schema definitions
  • Suggest specific refactorings β€” "Extract method" for long functions, "Replace conditional with polymorphism" for deep switch statements, "Introduce parameter object" for functions with 5+ parameters

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.