Gh pr review
Skill ComeOnOliver/skillshub/skills/CherryHQ/cherry-studio/gh-pr-review
🧠The right skill, one API call. AI agent skills registry with token-efficient skill resolution. 5,000+ skills from 500+ top repos.
npx -y skills add ComeOnOliver/skillshub --skill gh-pr-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Automated code review for local branches, PRs, commits, and files. Supports single-agent review with interactive fix selection, or multi-agent deep review with reviewer-verifier adversarial mechanism and risk-based auto-fix.
SKILL.md
3.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
/gh-pr-review — Code Review
Automated code review for local branches, PRs, commits, and files. Detects review mode from arguments and routes to the appropriate review flow — either quick single-agent review with interactive fix selection, or multi-agent deep review with risk-based auto-fix.
All user-facing text matches the user's language. All questions and option selections MUST use your interactive dialog tool (e.g. AskUserQuestion) — never output options as plain text. Do not proceed until the user replies. When presenting multi-select options: ≤4 items → one question. >4 items → group by priority or category (each group ≤4 options), then present all groups as separate questions in a single prompt.
Route
Run pre-checks, then match the first applicable rule top-to-bottom:
git branch --show-current→ record whether on main/master.git status --porcelain→ record whether uncommitted changes exist.- Check whether the current environment supports Agent tool with parallel subagents (agent teams).
| # | Condition | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | $ARGUMENTS is diag | → references/diagnosis.md |
| 2 | $ARGUMENTS is a PR number or URL containing /pull/ | → references/pr-review.md |
| 3 | Agent teams NOT supported | → references/local-review.md |
| 4 | Uncommitted changes exist | → references/local-review.md |
| 5 | On main/master branch | → references/local-review.md |
| 6 | Everything else | → Question below |
Each → means: Read the target file and follow it as the sole remaining
instruction. Ignore all sections below. Do NOT review from memory or habit —
each target file defines specific constraints on how to obtain diffs, apply
fixes, and submit results.
Question
Ask a single question: "Agent Teams is available (multiple agents working in parallel). Enable multi-agent review with reviewer–verifier adversarial mechanism and auto-fix?" Provide 4 options:
| Option | Description |
|---|---|
| Teams + auto-fix low & medium risk (recommended) | Multi-agent review; auto-fix most issues, only confirm high-risk ones (e.g., API changes, architecture). |
| Teams + auto-fix low risk | Multi-agent review; auto-fix only the safest issues (e.g., null checks, typos, naming). Confirm everything else. |
| Teams + auto-fix all | Multi-agent review; auto-fix everything. Only issues affecting test baselines are deferred. |
| Single-agent + manual fix | Single-agent review; interactively choose which issues to fix afterward. |
Hand off
| Option | → | FIX_MODE |
|---|---|---|
| Teams + auto-fix low & medium risk (recommended) | references/teams-review.md | low_medium |
| Teams + auto-fix low risk | references/teams-review.md | low |
| Teams + auto-fix all | references/teams-review.md | full |
| Single-agent + manual fix | references/local-review.md | — |
Pass $ARGUMENTS to the target file. For teams-review, also pass FIX_MODE
(low / low_medium / full).