Para skill
Skill ComeOnOliver/skillshub/skills/aiskillstore/marketplace/scifishelf/para-skill
🧠The right skill, one API call. AI agent skills registry with token-efficient skill resolution. 5,000+ skills from 500+ top repos.
npx -y skills add ComeOnOliver/skillshub --skill para-skillAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
PARA method knowledge management for Obsidian vaults. Use this skill whenever the user wants to organize notes using PARA (Projects, Areas, Resources, Archive), classify a note into a PARA category, route a note to the right vault folder, normalize frontmatter fields, run a PARA hygiene review, suggest archiving, audit vault structure, or process new knowledge inputs into an existing PARA-based vault. Also trigger when the user mentions inbox processing, vault cleanup, note classification, PARA review, or asks "where does this note belong?". Works with existing Obsidian skills (obsidian-markdown, obsidian-cli) — never replaces them.
SKILL.md
8.0 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
PARA Obsidian Skill
What this skill does
This skill provides PARA-method decision logic for Obsidian vaults. It decides where notes belong, when to archive, and how to keep the vault healthy — while leaving file creation, markdown formatting, and Obsidian syntax to the installed base skills.
PARA is an organizational framework by Tiago Forte that structures information by action relevance, not topic:
- Projects — concrete initiatives with a goal and an endpoint
- Areas — ongoing responsibilities with no fixed end date
- Resources — reference knowledge for potential future use
- Archive — completed, paused, or inactive content
Read references/classification-rules.md for detailed classification heuristics.
Vault Configuration
Default paths for this vault (override in conversation if different):
paths:
inbox: "0_Inbox" # created on demand if missing
projects: "1_Projects"
areas: "2_Areas"
resources: "3_Resources"
archive: "4_Archives"
Default mode: cautious — suggest first, act only when confident or explicitly asked.
Core Workflow
For every PARA-related task, follow this sequence:
- Read the note content, title, existing frontmatter, tags, and current file path
- Collect signals — look for project indicators (deadlines, tasks, goals), area indicators (ongoing, recurring), resource indicators (reference, no action pressure), archive indicators (done, cancelled, historical)
- Check conventions — respect existing
para_typefrontmatter; existing folder placement is a strong signal - Classify with a confidence level:
high,medium, orlow - Plan frontmatter additions — only add fields from the schema, never overwrite non-PARA fields
- Propose routing — suggest the target path
- Assess risk — only act directly when confidence is high AND the user has given explicit permission or the mode is
balanced/aggressive - Log changes when writing anything
When in doubt: set needs_review: true, place in Inbox, and explain why.
See references/classification-rules.md for the full decision tree.
Available Actions
capture — Process new content
Accept raw text, meeting notes, ideas, or document descriptions. Classify them, propose or create a note in the right location, and set frontmatter.
Example trigger: "Capture this: Vorbereitung Workshop Führungsteam April" Output: PARA classification + proposed path + frontmatter draft
classify — Classify an existing note
Read a note and determine its PARA type. Return classification, confidence level, and reasoning.
Example trigger: "Welcher PARA-Typ ist diese Notiz?" or "Klassifiziere 2_Areas/Weiterbildung/..."
Output: para_type, confidence, explanation, suggested changes
route — Determine or apply target location
Calculate the correct target folder for a note. In cautious mode: suggest only. With explicit permission: move the file.
Example trigger: "Wo gehört diese Notiz hin?" or "Route diese Notiz korrekt ein" Output: Current path → suggested path, reasoning, conflict check
normalize — Fix frontmatter
Add missing PARA frontmatter fields to a note without touching non-PARA fields. Never remove existing fields.
Example trigger: "Normalisiere das Frontmatter dieser Notiz" or "Füge PARA-Metadaten hinzu" Output: Updated frontmatter block (show diff before applying)
review — PARA hygiene report
Scan a folder or the whole vault for hygiene issues. See references/review-playbook.md for what to check.
Example trigger: "Mach einen PARA-Review" or "Zeig mir, was im Vault aufgeräumt werden sollte" Output: Structured report (projects without next steps, stale areas, inbox backlog, archiving candidates)
archive — Archive a note defensively
Move a note to the Archive folder with archived: true, archive_date, and updated status. Never delete. Preserve all wikilinks.
Example trigger: "Archiviere dieses Projekt" or "Das Projekt ist abgeschlossen" Output: Confirmation of move + frontmatter changes (dry-run by default)
audit — Full vault consistency audit
Scan all notes for PARA inconsistencies: missing frontmatter, wrong folder placement, orphaned notes, stale reviews. Produces a prioritized action list.
Example trigger: "Mach einen vollständigen Vault-Audit" or "Was stimmt in meinem Vault nicht?" Output: Audit report with actionable items
suggest — Recommendation without changes
Give a PARA recommendation with full reasoning, but make no changes to any file.
Example trigger: "Was würdest Du mit dieser Notiz machen?" or "Vorschlag für diese Datei" Output: Recommendation + reasoning (read-only)
Safety Rules
These rules are non-negotiable regardless of mode:
- No mass moves without explicit user authorization — always ask first
- No deletion — archive means move, never delete
- No overwriting non-PARA frontmatter fields — only add/update defined PARA fields
- Low confidence → needs_review — never force a classification when unsure
- Dry-run by default — show what would happen before doing it
- Preserve wikilinks — never rename files in ways that break
[[links]] - Log every structural change — use the change log format below
- No reclassification from a single weak signal — require 2+ supporting indicators
Change Log Format
When making structural changes, append to a PARA-Changelog.md in the vault root:
## 2026-03-14
- Classified `Meeting Notes Team Alpha` → project (confidence: medium)
- Suggested move to `1_Projects/team-alpha/` (not yet applied, needs_review: true)
- Normalized frontmatter in `2_Areas/Weiterbildung/KI-Kurs.md`
Frontmatter Schema
Read references/frontmatter-schema.md for the full field definitions.
Quick reference — only write these fields:
para_type: project # project | area | resource | archive
status: active # active | on-hold | done | archived | reference | needs_review
review_date: 2026-03-21
confidence: high # high | medium | low
needs_review: false
archived: false
archive_date: # only when archiving
source: manual # manual | meeting | import | daily-note | web
Never touch: titles, body content, existing tags not prefixed with para/, wikilinks, non-PARA frontmatter fields.
Cooperation with Other Skills
This skill handles: classification logic, routing decisions, PARA frontmatter, review reports
Leave to obsidian-markdown / obsidian-cli: file creation, markdown syntax, wikilink formatting, template application, dataview queries
When creating a new note as part of capture or route, delegate file creation to the obsidian-markdown or obsidian-cli skill if available. Only use direct file writes as fallback.
Read references/compatibility-notes.md for conflict avoidance rules.
Response Format
Always communicate:
- What you classified/found (with
para_typeandconfidence) - Why — at least 2 supporting signals
- What you propose to change (as a clear list)
- What you're uncertain about (if anything)
- What you'll do next — or ask for permission before acting
For reviews and audits, use the structured report format in references/review-playbook.md.