Workflow routing
Use at the start of any task to route between Superpowers skills and GSD commands based on project state, task scope, and context signals. Fires before other skills when both systems are installed.From its SKILL.md
npx -y skills add coco-research/coco --skill workflow-routingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
SKILL.md
9.2 KB, ~2.4k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Workflow Routing: Superpowers + GSD
Announce at start: "Workflow Routing skill activated."
Route every task to the right toolchain. Superpowers handles task-level quality (TDD, debugging, design, review). GSD handles project-level orchestration (phases, milestones, persistent state). They are complementary — never competing.
<HARD-GATE> Check routing BEFORE invoking any other skill or GSD command. This skill fires first. </HARD-GATE>Detection: Is GSD Active?
Check the current working directory:
digraph detect {
".planning/ exists?" [shape=diamond];
"ROADMAP.md exists?" [shape=diamond];
"GSD ACTIVE" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightblue];
"GSD NOT ACTIVE" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightyellow];
".planning/ exists?" -> "ROADMAP.md exists?" [label="yes"];
".planning/ exists?" -> "GSD NOT ACTIVE" [label="no"];
"ROADMAP.md exists?" -> "GSD ACTIVE" [label="yes"];
"ROADMAP.md exists?" -> "GSD NOT ACTIVE\n(stale or pre-roadmap)" [label="no"];
}
GSD active signals: .planning/PROJECT.md, .planning/ROADMAP.md, .planning/STATE.md all present.
Primary Routing Decision
digraph route {
"Task received" [shape=doublecircle];
"GSD active?" [shape=diamond];
"Task in current phase scope?" [shape=diamond];
"Scope: multi-phase?" [shape=diamond];
"Use GSD commands" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightblue];
"Use /gsd:quick" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightcyan];
"Suggest /gsd:new-project" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightblue];
"Use Superpowers skills" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightyellow];
"Task received" -> "GSD active?";
"GSD active?" -> "Task in current phase scope?" [label="yes"];
"GSD active?" -> "Scope: multi-phase?" [label="no"];
"Task in current phase scope?" -> "Use GSD commands" [label="yes"];
"Task in current phase scope?" -> "Use /gsd:quick" [label="no, small/unrelated"];
"Scope: multi-phase?" -> "Suggest /gsd:new-project" [label="yes"];
"Scope: multi-phase?" -> "Use Superpowers skills" [label="no"];
}
Scope Signals
| Signal | Indicates | Route |
|---|---|---|
| "build app", "create platform", "new project", "implement system" | Multi-phase | GSD |
| "phase", "milestone", "roadmap", "epic", "release" | Multi-phase | GSD |
| 6+ features, 2+ weeks, architectural decisions needed | Multi-phase | GSD |
| "fix bug", "add button", "update function", "refactor method" | Single-session | Superpowers |
| "quick fix", "hotfix", "one more thing" | Small/ad-hoc | Superpowers or /gsd:quick if GSD active |
| Unknown scope, user unsure | Undetermined | /brainstorming first to scope, then decide |
Combined Workflows
Multi-Phase Project (GSD + Superpowers for Quality)
/brainstorming ← Superpowers: design before planning
↓
/gsd:new-project ← GSD: project structure + roadmap
↓
/gsd:plan-phase N ← GSD: detailed phase plan
↓
/gsd:execute-phase N ← GSD: runs tasks with atomic commits
├── /systematic-debugging ← Superpowers: if bug during execution
└── /test-driven-development ← Superpowers: TDD within each task
↓
/requesting-code-review ← Superpowers: review before moving on
↓
/gsd:verify-work N ← GSD: UAT validation
↓
/verification-before-completion ← Superpowers: evidence-based "done"
↓
/gsd:progress ← GSD: route to next phase
Single-Session Task (Superpowers Only)
/brainstorming ← Explore intent, produce spec
↓
/writing-plans ← Break into TDD tasks
↓
/executing-plans ← Run tasks sequentially
OR /subagent-driven-development ← Run tasks via parallel subagents
├── /systematic-debugging ← If issues arise
└── /test-driven-development ← TDD per task
↓
/requesting-code-review ← Review before done
↓
/verification-before-completion ← Prove it works
↓
/finishing-a-development-branch ← Merge, PR, or cleanup
Edge Case Decision Trees
"Debug this" — Which Tool?
digraph debug {
"Bug reported" [shape=doublecircle];
"GSD active?" [shape=diamond];
"Bug related to current phase?" [shape=diamond];
"Will span multiple sessions?" [shape=diamond];
"/gsd:debug" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightblue];
"/systematic-debugging" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightyellow];
"Bug reported" -> "GSD active?";
"GSD active?" -> "Bug related to current phase?" [label="yes"];
"GSD active?" -> "Will span multiple sessions?" [label="no"];
"Bug related to current phase?" -> "/gsd:debug" [label="yes"];
"Bug related to current phase?" -> "/systematic-debugging\nthen /gsd:quick to commit" [label="no"];
"Will span multiple sessions?" -> "/gsd:debug" [label="yes, need persistence"];
"Will span multiple sessions?" -> "/systematic-debugging" [label="no, fix it now"];
}
"Plan this" — Which Tool?
digraph plan {
"Planning requested" [shape=doublecircle];
"GSD active?" [shape=diamond];
"Feature in roadmap?" [shape=diamond];
"/gsd:plan-phase N" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightblue];
"/gsd:add-phase or /gsd:quick" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightcyan];
"/brainstorming then /writing-plans" [shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor=lightyellow];
"Planning requested" -> "GSD active?";
"GSD active?" -> "Feature in roadmap?" [label="yes"];
"GSD active?" -> "/brainstorming then /writing-plans" [label="no"];
"Feature in roadmap?" -> "/gsd:plan-phase N" [label="yes, phase N"];
"Feature in roadmap?" -> "/gsd:add-phase or /gsd:quick" [label="no"];
}
Scope Escalation (Superpowers → GSD)
During /brainstorming, if scope grows beyond single-session:
Detection:
- 5+ independent subsystems identified
- 2+ weeks estimated work
- Multiple architectural decisions needed
- User says "this is bigger than I thought"
Action:
"This needs GSD's phase structure for persistence across sessions.
Ready to initialize /gsd:new-project with the spec we just brainstormed?"
→ Convert brainstorming output into GSD project input
→ User confirms escalation
User Picks Wrong Tool
User wants Superpowers for a large project:
"This sounds like it needs 5+ phases and multiple sessions. GSD would give you persistent state and milestone tracking. Want to use
/gsd:new-projectinstead?"
User wants GSD for a tiny task:
"This is small enough for a single session — GSD's ceremony would slow us down. Let's use
/brainstorming→/writing-plans→/executing-plansinstead."
Always respect the user's final choice. Suggest, don't force.
Universal Rules (Both Toolchains)
- Always
/brainstormingbefore creative work — regardless of GSD or Superpowers - Always
/verification-before-completionbefore claiming done — no exceptions - Always
/requesting-code-reviewafter significant implementation — works in both contexts - Always
/test-driven-developmentwhen writing code — embedded discipline, not optional - Always
/systematic-debuggingbefore proposing fixes — root cause first
Quick Reference: Command Mapping
| Task | GSD Active | No GSD |
|---|---|---|
| Design a feature | /brainstorming → /gsd:plan-phase | /brainstorming → /writing-plans |
| Execute a plan | /gsd:execute-phase N | /executing-plans or /subagent-driven-development |
| Fix a bug (small) | /gsd:quick | /systematic-debugging |
| Fix a bug (complex) | /gsd:debug | /systematic-debugging |
| Review code | /requesting-code-review | /requesting-code-review |
| Verify work | /gsd:verify-work N | /verification-before-completion |
| Check progress | /gsd:progress | N/A (session-scoped) |
| Resume paused work | /gsd:resume-work | Re-read plan file |
| Ad-hoc task | /gsd:quick | Direct Superpowers workflow |
| Start new project | /gsd:new-project | /brainstorming → /writing-plans |
Red Flags — You're Routing Wrong
| Symptom | Problem | Fix |
|---|---|---|
Using /writing-plans when .planning/ exists | Bypassing GSD's plan structure | Use /gsd:plan-phase instead |
Using /gsd:new-project for a 1-hour task | Overkill, ceremony slows you down | Use Superpowers workflow |
Skipping /brainstorming because "it's obvious" | Hidden assumptions will bite you | Brainstorm first, always |
Fixing bugs without /systematic-debugging | Guessing instead of investigating | Root cause first |
| Claiming "done" without verification evidence | No proof = no done | Run /verification-before-completion |
| Using Superpowers for multi-week work | Context lost between sessions | Escalate to GSD |
| Ignoring stale GSD project in directory | .planning/ exists for a reason | Run /gsd:progress to check state |
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most automation workflows skills give in ~2.4k tokens
Counted across 745 of the 1,008 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Write conventional commit messagesin 36 of 745, across 35 files
- Delete branches after mergein 30 of 745, across 21 files
- Make atomic commitsin 25 of 745, across 15 files
- Write minimal code to pass testsin 22 of 745, across 10 files
- Re-snapshot after navigation or DOM changesin 21 of 745, across 13 files
- Use try-catch for error handlingin 20 of 745, across 8 files
- Run tests before committingin 20 of 745, across 12 files
- Write tests before implementationin 20 of 745, across 8 files
- Configure branch protection rulesin 19 of 745, across 5 files
- Explain the why in commit messagesin 19 of 745, across 9 files
- Refactor code while tests remain greenin 19 of 745, across 6 files
- Interact with elements using refsin 19 of 745, across 11 files
Said here and by no other author read
- Check routing before invoking any other skill
- Check current working directory for project state files
- Route multi-phase work to GSD commands
- Route single-session tasks to Superpowers skills
- Use brainstorming before any creative work
- Use requesting-code-review after significant implementation
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.