Code reviewer
Use Claude Code like a Director, not a Programmer. MIT toolkit with Auto-Loop, guided setup, 27 commands, 14 agents, and 32 skills.
npx -y skills add claude-world/director-mode-lite --skill code-reviewerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Code review knowledge base: quality, security (OWASP Top 10), error-handling, performance, and test-coverage checklists with severity-ranked output format. Use when reviewing code changes, PRs, or before commits. Loaded automatically by the code-reviewer agent.
SKILL.md
2.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Code Reviewer Skill
Director Mode Lite - Code Review Specialist
Review Checklist
Canonical checklist for reviewing code changes. Work through every section.
1. Code Quality
- Clear, descriptive naming for functions and variables
- Proper function/method length (< 30 lines), focused and single-purpose
- Single responsibility principle
- No code duplication (DRY)
- Code is simple, readable, and self-documenting
- Comments explain "why", not "what"
2. Security (OWASP Top 10)
- Input validation at system boundaries
- SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
- XSS prevention
- Command injection prevention
- No exposed secrets, API keys, or credentials
- Authentication/Authorization checks
- Sensitive data handled securely (no data exposure)
3. Error Handling
- Appropriate error handling for edge cases
- Meaningful error messages
- Graceful degradation where appropriate
- No silent failures
4. Performance
- No N+1 queries; efficient database queries
- Efficient algorithms
- Proper caching where beneficial
- Memory leak prevention
- No unnecessary loops or computations
5. Testing
- Tests exist for new code
- Happy path and edge cases covered
- Test names clearly describe what is being tested
6. Documentation
- Complex logic is commented
- Public APIs are documented
- README updated if needed
Review Process
Step 1: Read the code changes
Step 2: Run through the checklist
Step 3: Provide feedback with:
- Category (Quality/Security/Error Handling/Performance/Testing/Docs)
- Severity (Critical/Major/Minor/Suggestion)
- Specific line reference
- Suggested fix
Output Format
## Code Review Summary
### Critical Issues
- [Security] Line 45: SQL injection vulnerability
- Suggested fix: Use parameterized queries
### Major Issues
- [Quality] Line 78-120: Function too long (42 lines)
- Suggested fix: Extract into smaller functions
### Minor Issues
- [Docs] Line 10: Missing JSDoc for public function
### Suggestions
- Consider adding input validation at line 23
### Approved
- [ ] Ready to merge (no critical/major issues)