Spawning plan
Curated collection of skills by Citedy — AI-powered SEO content automation
npx -y skills add citedy/skills --skill spawning-planAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Spawning Plan. Use when user wants to spawn agents, create a team, or coordinate multiple agents. Automatically gathers context, asks team topology questions, outputs clean TEAM PLAN markdown, and gets user approval. 3 steps: context gathering -> questions -> present plan. Requires Claude Code with Agent Teams support.
SKILL.md
4.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Spawning Plan
Design the optimal agent team for the task. Performant, precise, minimal.
Note: This skill requires Claude Code with Agent Teams support (TeamCreate, TaskCreate, SendMessage tools).
Task: $ARGUMENTS
Step 1: Context Gathering (Silent -- no user interaction)
A) Read environment:
CLAUDE.md-- workflow rules, conventions, constraints- Project manifests --
package.json,pyproject.toml,Cargo.toml,go.mod, etc. - Directory structure --
src/,app/,packages/, test dirs, monorepo indicators
B) Inventory existing agents:
- Scan
~/.claude/agents/*.md-- reuse matching agents instead of creating duplicates
C) Analyze task complexity:
- Work type: research, implementation, review, debugging, refactoring
- Scope: single-layer vs cross-layer
- Parallelism: can work split into independent streams?
- Complexity -> team size: simple (2 agents), medium (3-4), complex cross-cutting (5-6, max 8)
Step 2: Ask Team Questions (AskUserQuestion Tool)
Ask 3-5 questions based on Step 1 findings. Not all apply every time -- pick what matters.
-
Team Composition -- "For this [work type] on [stack], I'm thinking [N] agents: [role list]. What would you change?" Options: Perfect / Add role / Remove role / Different approach
-
Coordination -- "How should agents work together?" Options: Independent (no messaging) / Team (peer messaging) / Hub-spoke (lead coordinates)
-
Dependencies -- "Work order?" Options: All parallel / Sequential (A->B->C) / Mixed
-
Models -- "Model allocation: opus (research), sonnet (implementation), haiku (scanning). Adjust?" Options: As suggested / All opus / All sonnet / Custom
-
Agent Reuse (only if matching agents found in Step 1B) -- "Found existing
[agent-name]that handles [capability]. Reuse it?" Options: Reuse / Create fresh / Both
Step 3: Output & Approval
Present clean TEAM PLAN:
## TEAM PLAN
Task: [description]
Pattern: [independent | team | hub-spoke]
Work Order: [parallel | sequential | mixed]
Agents: [count]
### Teammates
- Teammate 1: [Name] ([Role])
Description: [1-2 line expertise and specialization]
Model: [opus|sonnet|haiku]
Type: [general-purpose | feature-dev:code-X | reuse ~/.claude/agents/X.md]
Responsible for: [specific deliverable]
Depends on: [-- | Teammate N]
- Teammate 2: [Name] ([Role])
Description: [1-2 line expertise and specialization]
Model: [opus|sonnet|haiku]
Type: [general-purpose | feature-dev:code-X]
Responsible for: [specific deliverable]
Depends on: [-- | Teammate N]
- ...
### Research (injected into agent prompts)
- [key finding or best practice 1]
- [key finding or best practice 2]
Final Approval (AskUserQuestion Tool)
"Launch this team?"
- Deploy & Simplify -- spawn agents, then auto-run /simplify on all changes
- Deploy & Save -- spawn agents and save as reusable skill
- Deploy Once -- spawn agents, one-time
- Adjust -- change something (iterate plan)
- Cancel -- abort
Deploy & Simplify -> spawn agents, wait for all to complete, then automatically run /simplify to review and fix code quality, reuse, and efficiency issues across all agent output. Best for implementation tasks.
Deploy & Save -> save team as skill at ~/.claude/skills/<team-name>/SKILL.md for future use via /<team-name> [task]. Saved skill skips planning, bakes in agent definitions, uses $ARGUMENTS for task input.
Adjust -> ask what to change -> regenerate plan -> ask again. Loop until approved.
Deploy Once -> spawn immediately, no save.
Cancel -> stop.
Spawning Execution
Based on chosen pattern:
- Independent: parallel Task tool calls, one per agent
- Team: TeamCreate -> TaskCreate per agent -> Task tool with
team_name-> TaskUpdate for dependencies - Hub-spoke: TeamCreate with lead agent (opus) that delegates via SendMessage
For detailed agent prompt structure, see references/agent-prompts.md.