Wiki stage commit
An LLM wiki for Obsidian: a markdown knowledge base your AI agents compile and maintain under written law. 32 skills for Claude Code and Hermes, a zero-dependency Python CLI, and a vault template governed by an 11-law constitution.
npx -y skills add chobizzy/llm-wiki --skill wiki-stage-commitAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
2 things to look at
- 25 days oldThe repository was created 25 days ago. New is not bad, but a brand new repository carrying a familiar-sounding name is the shape a typosquat arrives in, and there has been no time for anyone else to find a problem with it.
- 0 stars0 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Review and promote staged wiki pages to their final locations. Use when WIKI_STAGED_WRITES=true and the user says "/wiki-stage-commit", "review staged pages", "commit staged writes", "promote staged pages", "approve staged changes", or "what's waiting in staging". Shows each staged file, lets the user accept or reject it, and moves accepted files to their final wiki locations. Rejected files are moved back to _raw/ for manual editing.
SKILL.md
6.1 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
Wiki Stage Commit — Staged Write Promotion
You are reviewing LLM-written pages that are waiting in _staging/ for human approval before they land in the live wiki. This skill is only useful when WIKI_STAGED_WRITES=true in the vault config.
Before You Start
- Resolve config — follow the Config Resolution Protocol in
llm-wiki/SKILL.md. This givesOBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATHandWIKI_STAGED_WRITES. - If
WIKI_STAGED_WRITESis not set or isfalse, tell the user: "Staged writes mode is not enabled. SetWIKI_STAGED_WRITES=truein your.envto use this feature." Then stop. - Read the
_staging/directory inventory.
Invocation Forms
/wiki-stage-commit # interactive review: show each file and ask accept/reject
/wiki-stage-commit --all # accept all staged files without per-file review
/wiki-stage-commit --reject-all # reject all staged files (move to _raw/ for manual editing)
/wiki-stage-commit --list # list staged files with summary, no changes
Step 1: Inventory Staged Files
Glob $OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH/_staging/**/*.md — these are the pending pages.
Also glob $OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH/_staging/**/*.patch.md — these are pending updates to existing pages (diff-style files showing proposed additions and deletions).
Report the inventory:
Staged files: 4 new pages, 2 updates
New pages:
_staging/concepts/attention-mechanism.md (ingested 2 days ago)
_staging/entities/andrej-karpathy.md (ingested 2 days ago)
_staging/skills/fine-tuning-llms.md (ingested yesterday)
_staging/references/attention-is-all-you-need.md (ingested 3 hours ago)
Updates (patch files):
_staging/concepts/transformer-architecture.patch.md (target: concepts/transformer-architecture.md)
_staging/skills/prompt-engineering.patch.md (target: skills/prompt-engineering.md)
If _staging/ is empty, report: "Nothing staged. All writes have been committed or no staged writes have been produced yet."
Step 2: Per-File Review (interactive mode)
For each staged file (new pages first, then updates):
For new pages:
Display a summary:
--- New page: concepts/attention-mechanism.md ---
Title: Attention Mechanism
Tags: #ml #architecture
Summary: Core building block of transformers — computes weighted sum of values based on query-key similarity.
Tier: supporting
Confidence: 0.72
Sources: papers/attention.pdf
[Preview first 20 lines of body]
...
Accept [a], Reject [r], Skip [s], Preview full [p]?
For patch files:
Display a structured diff:
--- Update: concepts/transformer-architecture.md ---
Source: _staging/concepts/transformer-architecture.patch.md
Proposed additions (+):
+ Transformers outperform RNNs on tasks requiring long-range dependencies. ^[inferred]
+ New source: papers/survey-2026.pdf
Proposed deletions (-):
- The attention mechanism was first described in [Bahdanau 2015]. (to be replaced by updated claim)
⚠️ Conflict check: target page was modified 3 days after staging. Review carefully.
Accept [a], Reject [r], Skip [s], Preview full diff [p]?
If --all flag is set, skip prompting and accept every file.
If --reject-all flag is set, skip prompting and reject every file.
If --list flag is set, stop after printing the inventory (Step 1).
Step 3: Apply Decisions
Accepting a new page
- Move
_staging/<category>/page.md→<category>/page.md(the final location) - Update
index.mdwith the new page entry - Remove the staged file
Accepting a patch/update
- Read the current page at the target path
- Apply the proposed additions and deletions (merge, don't just overwrite)
- Update the
updatedfrontmatter timestamp - Update
index.mdif the summary changed - Remove the staged patch file
Rejecting a file
Move it to $OBSIDIAN_VAULT_PATH/_raw/ for manual editing:
_staging/concepts/page.md→_raw/rejected-concepts-page.md_staging/concepts/page.patch.md→_raw/rejected-patch-concepts-page.md- Prefix with
rejected-so the user can identify it
Conflict detection on patch accept
Before applying a patch, check whether the target page's updated frontmatter is newer than the patch file's own updated field:
- If the target was modified AFTER the patch was staged, warn:
⚠️ Conflict: target was updated since this patch was staged. Applying may lose recent changes. - Give the user a chance to abort:
Apply anyway [y], Skip [s], Reject [r]?
Step 4: Update Tracking Files
After processing all staged files:
hot.md— update the Recent Activity section: "Committed N staged pages; rejected M."log.md— append:- [TIMESTAMP] STAGE_COMMIT accepted=N rejected=M skipped=K
Step 5: Report
Stage commit complete.
✅ Accepted (N):
concepts/attention-mechanism.md → now live
entities/andrej-karpathy.md → now live
concepts/transformer-architecture.md → updated (patch applied)
❌ Rejected (M):
skills/fine-tuning-llms.md → moved to _raw/rejected-skills-fine-tuning-llms.md
⏭️ Skipped (K):
references/attention-is-all-you-need.md → still in _staging/
Staging queue: K files remaining
Notes
- Staged files use the same page template as live pages — they are ready to land, just awaiting approval
- Patch files use a human-readable diff format: lines starting with
+are additions, lines starting with-are deletions index.mdandlog.mdare always updated immediately on ingest (they are low-risk tracking files) — only category pages go through staging- The
_staging/directory is not tracked by Obsidian's graph view — pages only appear in the wiki after promotion
What ships with it
Read from the repository
Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most pr commit review skills give in ~1.5k tokens
Counted across 888 of the 1,342 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-07
- Use conventional commits formatin 127 of 888, across 115 files
- Keep subject line under 72 charactersin 62 of 888, across 48 files
- Delete branches after mergein 51 of 888, across 38 files
- Use imperative mood in subject linein 51 of 888, across 42 files
- Use imperative mood in commit messagesin 44 of 888
- Verify directory is ignored before creating worktreein 43 of 888, across 12 files
- Generate a conventional commit messagein 43 of 888
- Add unignored worktree directories to gitignorein 42 of 888, across 10 files
- Make atomic commitsin 39 of 888, across 27 files
- Run tests before committingin 36 of 888, across 25 files
- Verify clean test baselinein 35 of 888, across 9 files
- Split unrelated changes into separate commitsin 35 of 888, across 30 files
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once. Length counted with cl100k_base; the agent that loads this file may tokenize it differently.