Algo social sentiment
Skill charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/.cursor/skills/asgard-ai-platform/algo-social-sentiment
Curated skill pack for LLM agents in engineer and science workflow (Cursor & Claude ready).
npx -y skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill algo-social-sentimentAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 22 stars22 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Implement VADER sentiment analysis for social media text scoring. Use this skill when the user needs to analyze sentiment in tweets, reviews, or social posts, compute compound sentiment scores, or classify text polarity — even if they say 'is this positive or negative', 'sentiment of these comments', or 'social media mood analysis'.
SKILL.md
3.9 KB, 871 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it
VADER Sentiment Analysis
Overview
VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner) is a lexicon and rule-based sentiment tool optimized for social media. Returns compound score [-1, +1] combining positive, negative, and neutral proportions. Runs in O(n) per text where n = word count. No training required.
When to Use
Trigger conditions:
- Analyzing sentiment in social media posts, tweets, or reviews
- Quick sentiment scoring without ML model training
- Processing text with slang, emoticons, and informal language
When NOT to use:
- For formal/academic text (VADER is tuned for social media)
- When domain-specific sentiment matters (e.g., financial sentiment — use FinBERT)
- When sarcasm detection is critical (VADER doesn't detect sarcasm)
Algorithm
IRON LAW: VADER Is Designed for SOCIAL MEDIA Text
It handles slang, emoticons, capitalization, and punctuation as
sentiment modifiers. Applying it to formal documents (legal, academic,
medical) produces unreliable scores. For domain-specific text, use
domain-trained models instead.
Phase 1: Input Validation
Tokenize text. Preserve: capitalization (ALL CAPS = emphasis), punctuation (! amplifies), emoticons/emoji. Gate: Text is non-empty, encoding handled correctly.
Phase 2: Core Algorithm
- Look up each token in VADER lexicon (7,500+ sentiment-rated terms)
- Apply grammatical rules: negation ("not good" = negative), degree modifiers ("very good" > "good"), capitalization boost, punctuation amplification
- Compute raw valence scores for positive, negative, neutral proportions
- Compute compound score: normalized sum of all valence scores using formula: compound = sum / √(sum² + α) where α = 15
Phase 3: Verification
Classify: compound ≥ 0.05 → positive, ≤ -0.05 → negative, else neutral. Spot-check sample results. Gate: Classifications pass manual spot-check on 10-20 examples.
Phase 4: Output
Return compound score and polarity classification per text.
Output Format
{
"results": [{"text": "...", "compound": 0.76, "pos": 0.45, "neu": 0.55, "neg": 0.0, "label": "positive"}],
"metadata": {"texts_analyzed": 500, "distribution": {"positive": 0.45, "neutral": 0.35, "negative": 0.20}}
}
Examples
Sample I/O
Input: "This product is AMAZING!!! 😍" Expected: compound ≈ 0.87 (positive). Boosted by: CAPS, !!!, 😍 emoji.
Edge Cases
| Input | Expected | Why |
|---|---|---|
| "Not bad at all" | Slightly positive (~0.2) | Double negation partially handled |
| "😂😂😂" | Positive | Emoji mapped in lexicon |
| Empty string | Compound = 0, neutral | No tokens to score |
Gotchas
- Sarcasm is invisible: "Oh great, another meeting" reads as positive. VADER has no sarcasm detection.
- Negation window: VADER applies negation within a 3-word window. "I do not think this is bad" may misparse the negation chain.
- Emoji coverage: VADER's emoji lexicon may not cover newer emoji. Update or supplement as needed.
- Language limitation: VADER is English-only. For Chinese/Japanese, use language-specific tools (e.g., SnowNLP for Chinese).
- Compound threshold sensitivity: The 0.05 boundary is arbitrary. Adjust thresholds based on your specific use case and tolerance for false positives.
References
- For VADER lexicon and rules documentation, see
references/vader-rules.md - For comparison with transformer-based sentiment models, see
references/model-comparison.md
What ships with it: 3 files
24.4 KB alongside SKILL.md
examples/
- sample_scenario.md4.6 KB
references/
- model-comparison.md9.5 KB
- vader-rules.md10.3 KB