Algo seo tfidf
Skill charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill/.cursor/skills/asgard-ai-platform/algo-seo-tfidf
Curated skill pack for LLM agents in engineer and science workflow (Cursor & Claude ready).
npx -y skills add charlieviettq/awesome-agent-skill --skill algo-seo-tfidfAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 22 stars22 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Implement TF-IDF scoring to measure term importance relative to a document corpus. Use this skill when the user needs to rank documents by keyword relevance, extract important terms from text, or build a basic search relevance engine — even if they say 'find relevant documents', 'keyword extraction', or 'term importance'.
SKILL.md
3.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
TF-IDF
Overview
TF-IDF (Term Frequency–Inverse Document Frequency) scores term importance as TF(t,d) × IDF(t). High scores mean a term is frequent in a document but rare across the corpus. Computes in O(N × V) where N is documents and V is vocabulary size.
When to Use
Trigger conditions:
- Ranking documents by keyword relevance
- Extracting distinguishing terms from documents
- Building lightweight search without ML models
When NOT to use:
- When semantic similarity matters (use embeddings instead)
- When you need ranking with link authority (combine with PageRank)
Algorithm
IRON LAW: TF-IDF Measures RELATIVE Importance
- A term with high TF but low IDF is common, NOT important
- TF-IDF = TF(t,d) × log(N / DF(t))
- A term appearing in ALL documents has IDF = 0 → score = 0
Phase 1: Input Validation
Tokenize documents, apply lowercasing, remove stop words. Build vocabulary. Gate: All documents tokenized, vocabulary size reasonable.
Phase 2: Core Algorithm
- Compute TF(t,d) for each term in each document (raw count, log-normalized, or boolean)
- Compute IDF(t) = log(N / DF(t)) where DF(t) = number of documents containing term t
- Compute TF-IDF(t,d) = TF(t,d) × IDF(t)
- Optionally L2-normalize document vectors for cosine similarity
Phase 3: Verification
Check: terms appearing in all documents have IDF ≈ 0. Rare terms have high IDF. Gate: Score distribution is reasonable; common words score low.
Phase 4: Output
Return scored terms per document or ranked documents per query.
Output Format
{
"query_results": [{"document": "doc_id", "score": 0.73, "matching_terms": ["term1", "term2"]}],
"metadata": {"corpus_size": 1000, "vocabulary_size": 5000, "tf_variant": "log_normalized"}
}
Examples
Sample I/O
Input: Corpus: ["the cat sat", "the dog sat", "the cat played"], Query: "cat" Expected: TF("cat", doc1)=1/3, DF("cat")=2, IDF=log(3/2)=0.405. TF-IDF(doc1)=0.135, TF-IDF(doc3)=0.135, TF-IDF(doc2)=0
Edge Cases
| Input | Expected | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Term in all docs | Score = 0 | IDF = log(N/N) = 0 |
| Term in one doc | Highest IDF | log(N/1) = log(N) |
| Empty document | All scores = 0 | No terms to score |
Gotchas
- Stop words matter: Without stop word removal, "the", "is", "a" dominate TF but have zero IDF. Preprocess properly.
- TF variant choice: Raw count, log(1+count), or boolean TF produce very different rankings. Log normalization prevents long documents from dominating.
- IDF smoothing: Add 1 to denominator to avoid division by zero for unknown query terms: IDF = log(N / (DF+1)) + 1.
- Not semantic: "car" and "automobile" are treated as completely different terms. TF-IDF has no concept of synonymy.
- Corpus dependency: IDF values change when the corpus changes. Adding documents alters all scores.
Scripts
| Script | Description | Usage |
|---|---|---|
scripts/tfidf.py | Compute TF-IDF vectors, top terms per document, and query scoring | python scripts/tfidf.py --help |
Run python scripts/tfidf.py --verify to execute built-in sanity tests.
References
- For BM25 (improved TF-IDF), see
references/bm25-comparison.md - For efficient inverted index implementation, see
references/inverted-index.md