Cursor review

Skill Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness/skills/cursor-review

Run a Cursor Composer review as an advisory second opinion while keeping the primary review verdict on the host brain. Use when user invokes cursor:review, asks Cursor to review, or wants composer to sanity-check a diff. Cursor never owns APPROVE/REQUEST_CHANGES.From its SKILL.md

Install

npx -y skills add Chachamaru127/claude-code-harness --skill cursor-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

SKILL.md

3.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

cursor:review - Advisory Cursor Review

Cursor Composer (composer-2.5-fast) を read-only second opinion として使う review skill。primary verdict は host brain (Opus / Claude role) が出す。

Quick Reference

cursor:review --base origin/main
cursor:review "Phase 88.5 command namespace diff"

Rules

Cursor review is advisory. The final verdict must come from the host reviewer.
Do not pass --write to cursor-companion.sh.

Use resolver/model routing, not direct env checks:

bash scripts/resolve-impl-backend.sh --backend cursor --role reviewer
bash scripts/model-routing.sh --host cursor --role worker --field model

Prefer the existing harness-review contract when a full review is requested. This command exists for users who explicitly ask for the Cursor lane.

Flow

Resolve the Harness helper root:

HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT="${HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT:-${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-}}"
if [ -z "$HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT" ] && [ -n "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR:-}" ]; then
  probe="$(cd "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}" && pwd)"
  while [ "$probe" != "/" ] && [ ! -d "$probe/scripts" ]; do
    probe="$(cd "$probe/.." && pwd)"
  done
  [ -d "$probe/scripts" ] && HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT="$probe"
fi
if [ -z "$HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT" ]; then
  echo "ERROR: HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT is not set and could not be derived from CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT or CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR" >&2
  exit 2
fi

Determine review scope:

BASE_REF="${TASK_BASE_REF:-origin/main}"
REVIEW_SCOPE="${ARGUMENTS:-}"
if [ -n "${REVIEW_SCOPE}" ]; then
  set -- ${REVIEW_SCOPE}
  while [ "$#" -gt 0 ]; do
    case "$1" in
      --base)
        BASE_REF="${2:?--base requires a ref}"
        shift 2
        ;;
      --base=*)
        BASE_REF="${1#--base=}"
        shift
        ;;
      *)
        shift
        ;;
    esac
  done
fi
DIFF_STAT="$(git diff --stat "${BASE_REF}..HEAD")"
DIFF_TEXT="$(git diff "${BASE_REF}..HEAD")"

Ask Cursor in read-only mode:
```
PROMPT="$(cat <<EOF
```

Review this diff as an advisory second opinion. Base ref: ${BASE_REF} Requested scope: ${ARGUMENTS:-full diff}

Focus on bugs, regressions, missing tests, and unsafe assumptions. Do not propose broad refactors.

Diff stat: ${DIFF_STAT}

Diff: ${DIFF_TEXT} EOF )" bash "${HARNESS_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/cursor-companion.sh" task "${PROMPT}"


4. Host reads Cursor's output and performs the primary review:

- Findings first, ordered by severity.
- Mark Cursor-originated points as advisory when used.
- `APPROVE` / `REQUEST_CHANGES` must be the host decision, not a copied Cursor verdict.

## Output

Use the standard review shape:

- findings
- open questions
- validation run
- final host verdict

SKILL.md

cursor:review - Advisory Cursor Review

Quick Reference

Rules

Flow

Keep looking