Problem reframing
Skill cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/skills/problem-reframing
11 problem-shaped skills backed by 97 sourced reasoning patterns — Curie to Toulmin, as Claude Code agents. Every claim cites its source; a pre-commit gate blocks unsourced constants. Install the gates alone in 30s (zetetic-gates). The only agent system where "I don't know" is a feature.
npx -y skills add cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents --skill problem-reframingAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 7 stars7 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
The question itself may be the bug. Use when a debate goes in circles, both options of a binary feel wrong, improving one parameter degrades another, "we're stuck" on a problem that resists direct attack, a metaphor is doing hidden work in the architecture, or a trade-off is being denied rather than made.
SKILL.md
3.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Problem Reframing
Problem shape: effort is being spent on a question that is malformed — a false binary, a contradiction treated as a compromise, a metaphor mistaken for the mechanism, a dispute about words masquerading as a dispute about facts. The move: dissolve, restate, or invert the frame before solving anything.
Relevant geniuses
| Agent | Use when |
|---|---|
| wittgenstein | the dispute is about how words are being used — audit the language game; some problems dissolve rather than resolve |
| nagarjuna | both sides of a binary feel wrong — run the tetralemma (true / false / both / neither) |
| aristotle | "why" questions conflated — separate the four causes; catalog the fallacies in play |
| midgley | a metaphor (machine, war, market, brain) silently shapes the design — audit where it breaks down |
| leguin | a trade-off is being denied — force the genuine cost onto the table; audit the narrative frame of the plan |
| eco | the artifact will be interpreted — design for the model reader; bound the open vs closed interpretations |
| bateson | the conflict escalates symmetrically or the instructions double-bind — the pathology is in the interaction, not the parties |
| altshuller | improving one parameter degrades another — formulate the contradiction and resolve it, don't compromise |
| polya | stuck on a problem that resists direct attack — restate, work backward, find the related solved problem, specialize |
| schon | the current approach keeps failing mid-action — surface the implicit frame and switch strategy deliberately |
Invocation
- Pick the best-fit agent above. If two or more fit, run
tools/genius-invoker.sh route "<problem>"and take the top ranked match. - Load it:
tools/genius-invoker.sh invoke <agent> "<problem>", then readagents/genius/<agent>.mdin full. - Apply the agent's
<workflow>step by step and answer in its<output-format>. The deliverable is the reframed question plus what the new frame makes visible — then route the reframed problem to the right skill (estimation, causal-audit, formal-correctness, ...). - Typical chain: wittgenstein dissolves the verbal dispute → altshuller
formulates the residual contradiction → polya attacks it. Run via
tools/genius-invoker.sh compose wittgenstein altshuller -- "<problem>". - If no shape above matches, use a standard team agent instead.
Refuse when
- The frame is fine and the problem is just hard — reframing as procrastination.
- The requester wants the reframe to make a real trade-off disappear.