agentsclimarketplace

Problem reframing

Skill cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents/skills/problem-reframing

The question itself may be the bug. Use when a debate goes in circles, both options of a binary feel wrong, improving one parameter degrades another, "we're stuck" on a problem that resists direct attack, a metaphor is doing hidden work in the architecture, or a trade-off is being denied rather than made.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add cdeust/zetetic-team-subagents --skill problem-reframing

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

2 things to look at

  • 7 stars7 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
  • runs commandsInstructs the agent to run 3 commands, including `tools/genius-invoker.sh route "<problem>"` and 2 more.

SKILL.md

3.2 KB, 714 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Problem Reframing

Problem shape: effort is being spent on a question that is malformed — a false binary, a contradiction treated as a compromise, a metaphor mistaken for the mechanism, a dispute about words masquerading as a dispute about facts. The move: dissolve, restate, or invert the frame before solving anything.

Relevant geniuses

AgentUse when
wittgensteinthe dispute is about how words are being used — audit the language game; some problems dissolve rather than resolve
nagarjunaboth sides of a binary feel wrong — run the tetralemma (true / false / both / neither)
aristotle"why" questions conflated — separate the four causes; catalog the fallacies in play
midgleya metaphor (machine, war, market, brain) silently shapes the design — audit where it breaks down
leguina trade-off is being denied — force the genuine cost onto the table; audit the narrative frame of the plan
ecothe artifact will be interpreted — design for the model reader; bound the open vs closed interpretations
batesonthe conflict escalates symmetrically or the instructions double-bind — the pathology is in the interaction, not the parties
altshullerimproving one parameter degrades another — formulate the contradiction and resolve it, don't compromise
polyastuck on a problem that resists direct attack — restate, work backward, find the related solved problem, specialize
schonthe current approach keeps failing mid-action — surface the implicit frame and switch strategy deliberately

Invocation

  1. Pick the best-fit agent above. If two or more fit, run tools/genius-invoker.sh route "<problem>" and take the top ranked match.
  2. Load it: tools/genius-invoker.sh invoke <agent> "<problem>", then read agents/genius/<agent>.md in full.
  3. Apply the agent's <workflow> step by step and answer in its <output-format>. The deliverable is the reframed question plus what the new frame makes visible — then route the reframed problem to the right skill (estimation, causal-audit, formal-correctness, ...).
  4. Typical chain: wittgenstein dissolves the verbal dispute → altshuller formulates the residual contradiction → polya attacks it. Run via tools/genius-invoker.sh compose wittgenstein altshuller -- "<problem>".
  5. If no shape above matches, use a standard team agent instead.

Refuse when

  • The frame is fine and the problem is just hard — reframing as procrastination.
  • The requester wants the reframe to make a real trade-off disappear.

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 325,949. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.