Slo implementation
Claude Code configuration with 42 specialized agents, 33 skills, 28 commands, and a hook system for development best practices
npx -y skills add carlopezzuto/agents --skill slo-implementationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- 3 stars3 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Define and implement Service Level Indicators (SLIs) and Service Level Objectives (SLOs) with error budgets and alerting. Use when establishing reliability targets, implementing SRE practices, or measuring service performance.
SKILL.md
8.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
SLO Implementation
Framework for defining and implementing Service Level Indicators (SLIs), Service Level Objectives (SLOs), and error budgets.
Purpose
Implement measurable reliability targets using SLIs, SLOs, and error budgets to balance reliability with innovation velocity.
When to Use
- Define service reliability targets
- Measure user-perceived reliability
- Implement error budgets
- Create SLO-based alerts
- Track reliability goals
SLI/SLO/SLA Hierarchy
SLA (Service Level Agreement)
↓ Contract with customers
SLO (Service Level Objective)
↓ Internal reliability target
SLI (Service Level Indicator)
↓ Actual measurement
Defining SLIs
Common SLI Types
1. Availability SLI
# Successful requests / Total requests
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[28d]))
2. Latency SLI
# Requests below latency threshold / Total requests
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{le="0.5"}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_count[28d]))
3. Durability SLI
# Successful writes / Total writes
sum(storage_writes_successful_total)
/
sum(storage_writes_total)
Reference: See references/slo-definitions.md
Setting SLO Targets
Availability SLO Examples
| SLO % | Downtime/Month | Downtime/Year |
|---|---|---|
| 99% | 7.2 hours | 3.65 days |
| 99.9% | 43.2 minutes | 8.76 hours |
| 99.95% | 21.6 minutes | 4.38 hours |
| 99.99% | 4.32 minutes | 52.56 minutes |
Choose Appropriate SLOs
Consider:
- User expectations
- Business requirements
- Current performance
- Cost of reliability
- Competitor benchmarks
Example SLOs:
slos:
- name: api_availability
target: 99.9
window: 28d
sli: |
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[28d]))
- name: api_latency_p95
target: 99
window: 28d
sli: |
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{le="0.5"}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_count[28d]))
Error Budget Calculation
Error Budget Formula
Error Budget = 1 - SLO Target
Example:
- SLO: 99.9% availability
- Error Budget: 0.1% = 43.2 minutes/month
- Current Error: 0.05% = 21.6 minutes/month
- Remaining Budget: 50%
Error Budget Policy
error_budget_policy:
- remaining_budget: 100%
action: Normal development velocity
- remaining_budget: 50%
action: Consider postponing risky changes
- remaining_budget: 10%
action: Freeze non-critical changes
- remaining_budget: 0%
action: Feature freeze, focus on reliability
Reference: See references/error-budget.md
SLO Implementation
Prometheus Recording Rules
# SLI Recording Rules
groups:
- name: sli_rules
interval: 30s
rules:
# Availability SLI
- record: sli:http_availability:ratio
expr: |
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[28d]))
# Latency SLI (requests < 500ms)
- record: sli:http_latency:ratio
expr: |
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket{le="0.5"}[28d]))
/
sum(rate(http_request_duration_seconds_count[28d]))
- name: slo_rules
interval: 5m
rules:
# SLO compliance (1 = meeting SLO, 0 = violating)
- record: slo:http_availability:compliance
expr: sli:http_availability:ratio >= bool 0.999
- record: slo:http_latency:compliance
expr: sli:http_latency:ratio >= bool 0.99
# Error budget remaining (percentage)
- record: slo:http_availability:error_budget_remaining
expr: |
(sli:http_availability:ratio - 0.999) / (1 - 0.999) * 100
# Error budget burn rate
- record: slo:http_availability:burn_rate_5m
expr: |
(1 - (
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status!~"5.."}[5m]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
)) / (1 - 0.999)
SLO Alerting Rules
groups:
- name: slo_alerts
interval: 1m
rules:
# Fast burn: 14.4x rate, 1 hour window
# Consumes 2% error budget in 1 hour
- alert: SLOErrorBudgetBurnFast
expr: |
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_1h > 14.4
and
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_5m > 14.4
for: 2m
labels:
severity: critical
annotations:
summary: "Fast error budget burn detected"
description: "Error budget burning at {{ $value }}x rate"
# Slow burn: 6x rate, 6 hour window
# Consumes 5% error budget in 6 hours
- alert: SLOErrorBudgetBurnSlow
expr: |
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_6h > 6
and
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_30m > 6
for: 15m
labels:
severity: warning
annotations:
summary: "Slow error budget burn detected"
description: "Error budget burning at {{ $value }}x rate"
# Error budget exhausted
- alert: SLOErrorBudgetExhausted
expr: slo:http_availability:error_budget_remaining < 0
for: 5m
labels:
severity: critical
annotations:
summary: "SLO error budget exhausted"
description: "Error budget remaining: {{ $value }}%"
SLO Dashboard
Grafana Dashboard Structure:
┌────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SLO Compliance (Current) │
│ ✓ 99.95% (Target: 99.9%) │
├────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Error Budget Remaining: 65% │
│ ████████░░ 65% │
├────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SLI Trend (28 days) │
│ [Time series graph] │
├────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Burn Rate Analysis │
│ [Burn rate by time window] │
└────────────────────────────────────┘
Example Queries:
# Current SLO compliance
sli:http_availability:ratio * 100
# Error budget remaining
slo:http_availability:error_budget_remaining
# Days until error budget exhausted (at current burn rate)
(slo:http_availability:error_budget_remaining / 100)
*
28
/
(1 - sli:http_availability:ratio) * (1 - 0.999)
Multi-Window Burn Rate Alerts
# Combination of short and long windows reduces false positives
rules:
- alert: SLOBurnRateHigh
expr: |
(
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_1h > 14.4
and
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_5m > 14.4
)
or
(
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_6h > 6
and
slo:http_availability:burn_rate_30m > 6
)
labels:
severity: critical
SLO Review Process
Weekly Review
- Current SLO compliance
- Error budget status
- Trend analysis
- Incident impact
Monthly Review
- SLO achievement
- Error budget usage
- Incident postmortems
- SLO adjustments
Quarterly Review
- SLO relevance
- Target adjustments
- Process improvements
- Tooling enhancements
Best Practices
- Start with user-facing services
- Use multiple SLIs (availability, latency, etc.)
- Set achievable SLOs (don't aim for 100%)
- Implement multi-window alerts to reduce noise
- Track error budget consistently
- Review SLOs regularly
- Document SLO decisions
- Align with business goals
- Automate SLO reporting
- Use SLOs for prioritization
Reference Files
assets/slo-template.md- SLO definition templatereferences/slo-definitions.md- SLO definition patternsreferences/error-budget.md- Error budget calculations
Related Skills
prometheus-configuration- For metric collectiongrafana-dashboards- For SLO visualization
Gives 0 of the 12 instructions most monitoring observability skills give
Counted across 481 of the 483 authors here whose files we hold, read 2026-08-06
- link every alert to a runbookin 43 of 481, across 35 files
- use structured json loggingin 36 of 481, across 31 files
- alert on user-facing symptomsin 20 of 481, across 15 files
- emit structured JSON logs with stable event namesin 18 of 481, across 13 files
- propagate trace context across boundariesin 16 of 481
- use histograms for latency trackingin 14 of 481, across 9 files
- use OpenTelemetry for distributed tracingin 13 of 481, across 8 files
- include a correlation ID on every log linein 13 of 481, across 8 files
- Define service level objectivesin 10 of 481, across 7 files
- Call useAzureMonitor before importing other modulesin 9 of 481, across 2 files
- stop and ask for clarification if inputs are missingin 9 of 481, across 2 files
- define on-call questions before adding telemetryin 9 of 481, across 4 files
Said here and by no other author read
- measure user-perceived reliability
- define availability latency and durability SLIs
- set achievable SLO targets
- use multi-window alerts to reduce false positives
- review SLOs regularly
- document SLO decisions
Grouped from the skills themselves: near-identical wordings counted once, and counted by distinct author, so one author publishing three of these counts once.