agentsclimarketplace

Application tracker

Skill bydeng01/phd-application-skill/skills/application-tracker

A field-agnostic AI skill suite that automates PhD application research, outreach, and tracking via a shared, version-controlled knowledge base.

Install
npx -y skills add bydeng01/phd-application-skill --skill application-tracker

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • 1 stars1 stars. Stars are a popularity signal and not a quality one, but at this level it is likely that nobody has read this closely except its author, and you would be relying on your own review.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Track PhD application status, deadlines, required documents, and follow-up timing across many universities at once. Use this whenever the user wants to manage, check, review, or get a status update on their applications — e.g. "what deadlines are coming up?", "which professors haven't replied?", "what do I still need for the MIT application?", "where am I with everything?", "remind me to follow up", or "give me a status update on my PhD apps". Reads the application status files and interaction logs in the knowledge base, surfaces what's due, missing, or overdue, updates the records, and can set up recurring reminders. Trigger whenever the intent is to get oriented across multiple applications or stay on top of deadlines and follow-ups, even if the user doesn't say "tracker".

SKILL.md

4.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Application tracker

A PhD applicant is running many parallel processes — different deadlines, document checklists, and pending replies across a dozen labs — and the failure mode is silent: a missed deadline or a follow-up that never happened costs an entire opportunity. This skill is the applicant's air-traffic control. Its value is surfacing the few things that need action now out of a mass of state, accurately, so nothing winnable slips.

What you produce

An updated set of status.md files plus a concise action digest for the user: what's overdue, what's due soon, what's missing, and what's waiting on someone else. Accuracy and prioritization matter more than completeness — a digest that buries the one urgent deadline under thirty lines of "no action needed" has failed.

Step 1 — Gather state

Read every knowledge-base/applications/*/status.md (the stage, deadline, priority, checklist, and timeline) and the knowledge-base/interactions/*.md logs (what was sent, when, and any Follow-up due dates). Determine today's date with the shell rather than assuming it — overdue/upcoming calculations depend on it.

Step 2 — Compute what needs attention

Sort everything into a small number of action buckets, ordered by urgency:

  • Overdue — a passed application deadline still marked unsubmitted, or a Follow-up due date in the past with status still "awaiting reply". These are the headline items.
  • Due soon — deadlines or follow-ups within the next ~14 days. Show the date and the days remaining so urgency is legible.
  • Missing documents — checklist items still pending for applications whose deadline is approaching (transcripts, letters, writing samples, test scores). Surface these early because documents like recommendation letters have their own lead time.
  • Waiting on others — sent emails or submitted applications where the ball is in the professor's or committee's court; note when a polite follow-up becomes appropriate.
  • No action needed — everything else, summarized in a single line, not enumerated.

For follow-up timing, respect the dates logged by outreach-email; a cold email typically warrants a follow-up ~2 weeks out, and only one or two follow-ups before moving on.

Step 3 — Update the records

Where the state has clearly changed, update the status.md files: advance stage, tick completed checklist items, correct deadlines you've confirmed. Keep edits faithful to what you actually know — don't mark something submitted on assumption. If you change a record, note it so the user can see what moved.

Step 4 — Deliver the digest

Lead with the action buckets, most urgent first. Be specific and scannable:

## PhD application status — <date>

### ⚠ Overdue / act now
- <App>: follow-up to Prof X is 5 days overdue (emailed <date>, no reply) → send follow-up
- ...

### Due within 14 days
- <App>: application deadline <date> (in 9 days); still missing: writing sample

### Waiting on others
- <App>: submitted <date>; committee decisions typically <timeframe>

### On track
- 6 other applications, nothing due in the next two weeks.

End with a short recommended next-action list tied to the urgent items (e.g. "draft the overdue follow-up to Prof X" → hand to outreach-email; "request the missing transcript").

Step 5 — Offer recurring tracking

Staying on top of deadlines is inherently recurring, and the whole point is to catch things before they're missed. Offer to set up a scheduled task (e.g. a Monday-morning digest) that re-runs this check and surfaces only what needs action that week. Many applicants don't realize this can run automatically.

Guardrails

Never invent or guess a deadline or a status — an applicant who relies on a fabricated date is worse off than one who knows the date is unconfirmed. When a date or requirement is unverified, say so and flag it for the user to confirm at the source. Don't auto-send follow-ups; surface that one is due and hand the drafting to outreach-email for the user to review and send.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.