Docs
Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/docs
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill docsAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
SKILL.md
5.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Which skill should I use?
1,052 skills is a lot. This guide routes you to the right one by what you are
trying to do, then by method and language. For interactive filtering
use search.html; for the full tag index see
TAXONOMY.md; for copy-paste end-to-end runs see
GOLDEN_WORKFLOWS.md.
Trust note: a green hygiene score in
SKILL_HYGIENE.mdmeans a skill is well-formed. Whether it makes an agent produce correct econometrics is whateval-harness/andbenchmark/measure. Prefer skills whose behavior is covered by an eval scenario.
Start from your goal
| I want to… | Use | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Run a full empirical pipeline in Python | StatsPAI or 00.1 Python | data → identification → estimation → robustness → tables/figures |
| Run the same pipeline in Stata / R | 00.2 Stata · 00.3 R | language-matched ports of the pipeline |
| Audit my identification before writing | aer-identification | gates TWFE behind the 2×2 conditions; weak-IV / RDD pitfalls |
| Build the robustness gauntlet referees expect | aer-robustness | placebo triplet, spec curve, heterogeneity by theory |
| Write the introduction / abstract for a top-5 | aer-introduction | Keith Head 5-paragraph formula; 100-word abstract |
| Format tables & figures to AER house style | aer-tables-figures | booktabs, figure notes, one claim per exhibit |
| Pre-submission compliance check | aer-submission | abstract length, disclosure, AI usage, ScholarOne package |
| Write a R&R / rebuttal letter | aer-rebuttal | written against the revised manuscript |
| Build a replication package | aer-replication | AEA Data & Code Availability Policy, openICPSR-ready |
| Get causal-method code templates | causal-inference-mixtape · MixtapeTools | 10 designs, Python/R/Stata |
| Lower the AI-writing signal of a Chinese draft | chinese-de-aigc | structural rewrite, facts preserved |
| De-slop English academic prose | avoid-ai-writing · stop-slop | |
| Run a literature review | literature-review | see also stage:literature in the taxonomy |
Then narrow by method
Pick the design, then jump to the method tag in TAXONOMY.md:
- Staggered diff-in-diff? You almost never want plain TWFE. Look for
staggered-didskills (Callaway–Sant'Anna, Sun–Abraham, Borusyak et al., de Chaisemartin–D'Haultfœuille). Covered by the evalstatspai-staggered-did. - Instrumental variables? Check the
ivtag; you want first-stage F reporting and weak-IV-robust inference. Covered bystatspai-weak-iv. - Regression discontinuity? Check
rdd; you want a density/manipulation test, bandwidth sensitivity, and robust bias-corrected CIs. Covered bystatspai-rdd-diagnostics. - Synthetic control / matching / DML? Tags
synthetic-control,matching,dml.
Then narrow by language
Filter the language facet (python, r, stata, latex) in
search.html. The 00.x pipeline skills exist in all three
analysis languages so you can match your stack.
A 30-second decision tree
Do you have a dataset and need results?
├─ yes → identification first: aer-identification
│ then run the pipeline: 00 / 00.1 / 00.2 / 00.3 (by language)
│ then robustness: aer-robustness
└─ no, I have results and need a paper
├─ intro/abstract → aer-introduction
├─ tables/figures → aer-tables-figures
├─ submission compliance → aer-submission
├─ referee response (R&R) → aer-rebuttal
└─ reproducibility package → aer-replication
Polishing prose?
├─ Chinese → chinese-de-aigc
└─ English → avoid-ai-writing / stop-slop
See also
GOLDEN_WORKFLOWS.md— ready-to-run multi-skill workflows- The numbered workflow-stage notes:
01-选题与研究设计…10-审稿回复与学术答辩 SKILL_CATALOG.md— the full generated catalog