agentsclimarketplace

Slr automation guide

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/methodology/slr-automation-guide

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill slr-automation-guide

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Tools and pipelines for automating systematic literature reviews

SKILL.md

6.1 KB, ~1.5k tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Systematic Literature Review Automation Guide

Overview

Systematic Literature Reviews (SLRs) are rigorous, reproducible surveys of research evidence following protocols like PRISMA and Cochrane. This guide covers tools that automate the most time-consuming steps — deduplication, title/abstract screening, full-text assessment, and data extraction — using active learning, NLP, and AI agents. Key tools include ASReview, Rayyan, and custom pipelines.

SLR Pipeline

Protocol Definition (PICO, inclusion/exclusion criteria)
         ↓
   Database Search (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science)
         ↓
   Deduplication (ASReview, Rayyan, or custom)
         ↓
   Title/Abstract Screening (AI-assisted prioritization)
         ↓
   Full-text Assessment (relevance + quality)
         ↓
   Data Extraction (structured tables)
         ↓
   Quality Assessment (risk of bias)
         ↓
   Synthesis + PRISMA Report

ASReview (Active Learning)

# Install ASReview
pip install asreview

# Launch web interface
asreview lab

# CLI screening
asreview simulate benchmark:van_de_Schoot_2017 \
  -m nb -e tfidf \
  --n_prior_included 5 --n_prior_excluded 5 \
  -o results/simulation.asreview

Python API

import asreview
from asreview import ASReviewData, ReviewSimulate

# Load dataset (RIS, CSV, or Excel)
data = ASReviewData.from_file("search_results.ris")
print(f"Records: {len(data)}")

# Active learning simulation
sim = ReviewSimulate(
    data,
    model="nb",              # Naive Bayes classifier
    feature_extraction="tfidf",
    query_strategy="max",     # Show most likely relevant first
    n_prior_included=5,
    n_prior_excluded=5,
)
sim.review()

# Results: screening order optimized by relevance
print(f"Work saved: {sim.work_saved():.1%}")
# Typically 80-95% of irrelevant papers screened out early

Deduplication

# ASReview deduplication
from asreview.data import ASReviewData

# Merge results from multiple databases
datasets = [
    ASReviewData.from_file("pubmed_results.ris"),
    ASReviewData.from_file("scopus_results.ris"),
    ASReviewData.from_file("wos_results.ris"),
]

merged = ASReviewData.from_dataframe(
    pd.concat([d.df for d in datasets])
)
print(f"Before dedup: {len(merged)}")

# Fuzzy matching on title + DOI
deduplicated = merged.deduplicate()
print(f"After dedup: {len(deduplicated)}")

AI-Assisted Screening

# Custom LLM screening pipeline
from slr_tools import LLMScreener

screener = LLMScreener(
    llm_provider="anthropic",
    criteria={
        "population": "Adults with type 2 diabetes",
        "intervention": "SGLT2 inhibitors",
        "outcomes": "Cardiovascular events",
        "study_types": ["RCT", "cohort", "meta-analysis"],
        "exclusions": ["animal studies", "in vitro", "pediatric"],
    },
)

# Screen abstracts
results = screener.screen_batch(
    records=search_results,
    fields=["title", "abstract"],
    threshold=0.5,  # Include if P(relevant) > 0.5
)

for r in results:
    print(f"[{'INCLUDE' if r.include else 'EXCLUDE'}] "
          f"(p={r.confidence:.2f}) {r.title[:60]}...")
    print(f"  Reason: {r.reason}")

Data Extraction

# Structured data extraction from full-text papers
from slr_tools import DataExtractor

extractor = DataExtractor(
    llm_provider="anthropic",
    schema={
        "study_design": "str",
        "sample_size": "int",
        "population_description": "str",
        "intervention_details": "str",
        "primary_outcome": "str",
        "effect_size": "float",
        "confidence_interval": "str",
        "p_value": "float",
        "follow_up_duration": "str",
        "risk_of_bias": "str",
    },
)

# Extract from PDF
extracted = extractor.extract("paper.pdf")
print(extracted.to_dict())

# Batch extraction
results_df = extractor.extract_batch("fulltext_papers/")
results_df.to_csv("extraction_table.csv")

PRISMA Flow Diagram

# Generate PRISMA 2020 flow diagram
from slr_tools import PRISMAFlow

flow = PRISMAFlow(
    identification={
        "databases": {"PubMed": 1200, "Scopus": 890, "WoS": 650},
        "other_sources": {"citation_search": 45},
    },
    screening={
        "after_dedup": 1850,
        "excluded_title_abstract": 1620,
        "sought_fulltext": 230,
        "not_retrieved": 12,
    },
    included={
        "assessed_fulltext": 218,
        "excluded_fulltext": {
            "wrong_population": 45,
            "wrong_intervention": 32,
            "wrong_outcome": 28,
            "wrong_study_type": 15,
        },
        "final_included": 98,
    },
)

flow.save_svg("prisma_flow.svg")
flow.save_latex("prisma_flow.tex")

Quality Assessment

# Risk of Bias assessment (Cochrane RoB 2)
from slr_tools import RiskOfBias

rob = RiskOfBias(tool="rob2")  # or "robins_i" for non-RCTs

assessment = rob.assess(
    paper="paper.pdf",
    domains=[
        "randomization_process",
        "deviations_from_intervention",
        "missing_outcome_data",
        "outcome_measurement",
        "selection_of_reported_result",
    ],
)

print(f"Overall: {assessment.overall_judgment}")
for domain, judgment in assessment.domain_judgments.items():
    print(f"  {domain}: {judgment}")

Use Cases

  1. Medical SLRs: Cochrane-style evidence reviews
  2. CS surveys: Comprehensive literature mapping
  3. Policy reviews: Evidence synthesis for policy decisions
  4. Thesis literature chapters: Structured review sections
  5. Grant applications: Rapid evidence landscape scans

References

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.