Llm scientific discovery guide
๐ฌ A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | ็ฒพ้ 23,000+ AI Agent ๆ่ฝๅบ๏ผ่ฆ็8ๅคง็คพไผ็งๅญฆๅญฆ็ง็ๅฎ่ฏ็ ็ฉถใCoPaper.AI 20ๅ้ๅฎๆไธ็ฏๅฏๅค็ฐ็่ง่ๅฎ่ฏ่ฎบๆ๏ผๅนถๆฏๆ็จๆทไธไผ Skillsใ-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill llm-scientific-discovery-guideAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Survey of LLM agents for biomedical scientific discovery
SKILL.md
5.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
LLM Agents for Scientific Discovery Guide
Overview
A curated survey of how LLM-based agents are being applied to scientific discovery, with a focus on biomedical research. Covers hypothesis generation, experiment design, lab automation, literature synthesis, and multi-agent scientific collaboration. Tracks papers, tools, and frameworks across the spectrum from fully autonomous to human-in-the-loop systems.
Landscape
LLM Agents for Scientific Discovery
โโโ Hypothesis Generation
โ โโโ Literature-based (gap identification)
โ โโโ Data-driven (pattern discovery)
โ โโโ Analogy-based (cross-domain transfer)
โโโ Experiment Design
โ โโโ Protocol generation
โ โโโ Parameter optimization
โ โโโ Control selection
โโโ Lab Automation
โ โโโ Robot control (self-driving labs)
โ โโโ Equipment programming
โ โโโ Data collection orchestration
โโโ Analysis & Interpretation
โ โโโ Statistical analysis
โ โโโ Visualization
โ โโโ Result interpretation
โโโ Communication
โโโ Paper writing
โโโ Presentation generation
โโโ Peer review simulation
Key Systems
| System | Domain | Capability |
|---|---|---|
| AI Scientist | ML/AI | Full paper generation pipeline |
| ChemCrow | Chemistry | Tool-augmented chemical reasoning |
| Coscientist | Chemistry | Autonomous experiment execution |
| BioPlanner | Biology | Experiment protocol generation |
| MedAgent | Medicine | Clinical trial analysis |
| GenAgent | Genomics | Gene expression analysis |
| DrugAgent | Pharma | Drug interaction prediction |
Hypothesis Generation
# LLM-based hypothesis generation pattern
from scientific_agent import HypothesisGenerator
generator = HypothesisGenerator(
llm_provider="anthropic",
knowledge_sources=["pubmed", "openalex"],
)
hypotheses = generator.generate(
domain="oncology",
context="Recent findings show that gut microbiome "
"composition correlates with immunotherapy response",
constraints=[
"Must be testable in vitro",
"Should involve specific bacterial species",
"Must have measurable endpoints",
],
num_hypotheses=5,
)
for h in hypotheses:
print(f"\nHypothesis: {h.statement}")
print(f" Rationale: {h.rationale}")
print(f" Supporting evidence: {len(h.evidence)} papers")
print(f" Novelty score: {h.novelty_score:.2f}")
print(f" Feasibility: {h.feasibility}")
Self-Driving Lab Integration
# Agent controlling automated experiments
from scientific_agent import LabAgent
agent = LabAgent(
llm_provider="anthropic",
equipment=["plate_reader", "liquid_handler", "incubator"],
safety_constraints=["bsl2", "max_volume_1ml"],
)
# Design and run experiment
result = agent.run_experiment(
objective="Determine IC50 of compound X against cell line Y",
protocol_type="dose_response",
parameters={
"compound": "Compound_X",
"cell_line": "HeLa",
"concentrations": "serial_dilution",
"replicates": 3,
"readout": "cell_viability",
},
)
print(f"IC50: {result.ic50:.2f} uM")
print(f"R-squared: {result.r_squared:.3f}")
result.plot_dose_response("dose_response.pdf")
Multi-Agent Scientific Collaboration
# Agents with different scientific roles
from scientific_agent import ScientificTeam
team = ScientificTeam(
agents={
"PI": {"role": "research_director",
"expertise": "oncology"},
"Experimentalist": {"role": "experiment_design",
"expertise": "cell_biology"},
"Analyst": {"role": "data_analysis",
"expertise": "biostatistics"},
"Writer": {"role": "manuscript_writing",
"expertise": "scientific_communication"},
},
)
# Collaborative research cycle
project = team.start_project(
title="Microbiome-immunotherapy interaction study",
timeline_weeks=12,
)
# Agents collaborate: PI directs โ Experimentalist designs โ
# Analyst processes โ Writer documents
Reading Roadmap
### Foundational Papers
1. "The AI Scientist" (Lu et al., 2024) โ Fully automated ML research
2. "ChemCrow" (Bran et al., 2023) โ Chemistry tool-use agent
3. "Coscientist" (Boiko et al., 2023) โ Autonomous chemical research
4. "BioPlanner" (Biswas et al., 2024) โ Biology protocol generation
### Surveys
5. "Scientific Discovery in the Age of AI" (Wang et al., 2023)
6. "Foundation Models for Science" (Bommasani et al., 2022)
7. "LLM Agents: A Survey" (multiple, 2024)
### Ethics & Limitations
8. "Dual-use concerns of AI in biology" (Sandbrink, 2023)
9. "Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas?" (Si et al., 2024)
Use Cases
- Literature mining: Automated hypothesis from research gaps
- Experiment automation: Self-driving lab orchestration
- Drug discovery: Multi-agent screening and optimization
- Research planning: Protocol and proposal generation
- Scientific writing: Paper drafting with verified claims