agentsclimarketplace

Llm scientific discovery guide

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/research/deep-research/llm-scientific-discovery-guide

๐Ÿ”ฌ A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | ็ฒพ้€‰ 23,000+ AI Agent ๆŠ€่ƒฝๅบ“๏ผŒ่ฆ†็›–8ๅคง็คพไผš็ง‘ๅญฆๅญฆ็ง‘็š„ๅฎž่ฏ็ ”็ฉถใ€‚CoPaper.AI 20ๅˆ†้’ŸๅฎŒๆˆไธ€็ฏ‡ๅฏๅค็Žฐ็š„่ง„่Œƒๅฎž่ฏ่ฎบๆ–‡๏ผŒๅนถๆ”ฏๆŒ็”จๆˆทไธŠไผ  Skillsใ€‚-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill llm-scientific-discovery-guide

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Survey of LLM agents for biomedical scientific discovery

SKILL.md

5.7 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

LLM Agents for Scientific Discovery Guide

Overview

A curated survey of how LLM-based agents are being applied to scientific discovery, with a focus on biomedical research. Covers hypothesis generation, experiment design, lab automation, literature synthesis, and multi-agent scientific collaboration. Tracks papers, tools, and frameworks across the spectrum from fully autonomous to human-in-the-loop systems.

Landscape

LLM Agents for Scientific Discovery
โ”œโ”€โ”€ Hypothesis Generation
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ Literature-based (gap identification)
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ Data-driven (pattern discovery)
โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ Analogy-based (cross-domain transfer)
โ”œโ”€โ”€ Experiment Design
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ Protocol generation
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ Parameter optimization
โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ Control selection
โ”œโ”€โ”€ Lab Automation
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ Robot control (self-driving labs)
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ Equipment programming
โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ Data collection orchestration
โ”œโ”€โ”€ Analysis & Interpretation
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ Statistical analysis
โ”‚   โ”œโ”€โ”€ Visualization
โ”‚   โ””โ”€โ”€ Result interpretation
โ””โ”€โ”€ Communication
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ Paper writing
    โ”œโ”€โ”€ Presentation generation
    โ””โ”€โ”€ Peer review simulation

Key Systems

SystemDomainCapability
AI ScientistML/AIFull paper generation pipeline
ChemCrowChemistryTool-augmented chemical reasoning
CoscientistChemistryAutonomous experiment execution
BioPlannerBiologyExperiment protocol generation
MedAgentMedicineClinical trial analysis
GenAgentGenomicsGene expression analysis
DrugAgentPharmaDrug interaction prediction

Hypothesis Generation

# LLM-based hypothesis generation pattern
from scientific_agent import HypothesisGenerator

generator = HypothesisGenerator(
    llm_provider="anthropic",
    knowledge_sources=["pubmed", "openalex"],
)

hypotheses = generator.generate(
    domain="oncology",
    context="Recent findings show that gut microbiome "
            "composition correlates with immunotherapy response",
    constraints=[
        "Must be testable in vitro",
        "Should involve specific bacterial species",
        "Must have measurable endpoints",
    ],
    num_hypotheses=5,
)

for h in hypotheses:
    print(f"\nHypothesis: {h.statement}")
    print(f"  Rationale: {h.rationale}")
    print(f"  Supporting evidence: {len(h.evidence)} papers")
    print(f"  Novelty score: {h.novelty_score:.2f}")
    print(f"  Feasibility: {h.feasibility}")

Self-Driving Lab Integration

# Agent controlling automated experiments
from scientific_agent import LabAgent

agent = LabAgent(
    llm_provider="anthropic",
    equipment=["plate_reader", "liquid_handler", "incubator"],
    safety_constraints=["bsl2", "max_volume_1ml"],
)

# Design and run experiment
result = agent.run_experiment(
    objective="Determine IC50 of compound X against cell line Y",
    protocol_type="dose_response",
    parameters={
        "compound": "Compound_X",
        "cell_line": "HeLa",
        "concentrations": "serial_dilution",
        "replicates": 3,
        "readout": "cell_viability",
    },
)

print(f"IC50: {result.ic50:.2f} uM")
print(f"R-squared: {result.r_squared:.3f}")
result.plot_dose_response("dose_response.pdf")

Multi-Agent Scientific Collaboration

# Agents with different scientific roles
from scientific_agent import ScientificTeam

team = ScientificTeam(
    agents={
        "PI": {"role": "research_director",
               "expertise": "oncology"},
        "Experimentalist": {"role": "experiment_design",
                           "expertise": "cell_biology"},
        "Analyst": {"role": "data_analysis",
                   "expertise": "biostatistics"},
        "Writer": {"role": "manuscript_writing",
                  "expertise": "scientific_communication"},
    },
)

# Collaborative research cycle
project = team.start_project(
    title="Microbiome-immunotherapy interaction study",
    timeline_weeks=12,
)

# Agents collaborate: PI directs โ†’ Experimentalist designs โ†’
# Analyst processes โ†’ Writer documents

Reading Roadmap

### Foundational Papers
1. "The AI Scientist" (Lu et al., 2024) โ€” Fully automated ML research
2. "ChemCrow" (Bran et al., 2023) โ€” Chemistry tool-use agent
3. "Coscientist" (Boiko et al., 2023) โ€” Autonomous chemical research
4. "BioPlanner" (Biswas et al., 2024) โ€” Biology protocol generation

### Surveys
5. "Scientific Discovery in the Age of AI" (Wang et al., 2023)
6. "Foundation Models for Science" (Bommasani et al., 2022)
7. "LLM Agents: A Survey" (multiple, 2024)

### Ethics & Limitations
8. "Dual-use concerns of AI in biology" (Sandbrink, 2023)
9. "Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas?" (Si et al., 2024)

Use Cases

  1. Literature mining: Automated hypothesis from research gaps
  2. Experiment automation: Self-driving lab orchestration
  3. Drug discovery: Multi-agent screening and optimization
  4. Research planning: Protocol and proposal generation
  5. Scientific writing: Paper drafting with verified claims

References

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.