agentsclimarketplace

Genotex benchmark guide

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/43-wentorai-research-plugins/skills/domains/biomedical/genotex-benchmark-guide

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill genotex-benchmark-guide

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Benchmark for LLM agents on gene expression data analysis

SKILL.md

3.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

GenoTEX Benchmark Guide

Overview

GenoTEX is a benchmark for evaluating LLM-based agents on gene expression data analysis tasks. It provides curated datasets from GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) with ground-truth analysis pipelines, testing agents on data preprocessing, differential expression, enrichment analysis, and biological interpretation. Published at MLCB 2025 as an oral presentation.

Benchmark Structure

GenoTEX Benchmark
├── Data Collection
│   └── Curated GEO datasets with ground truth
├── Task Categories
│   ├── Data preprocessing (QC, normalization)
│   ├── Differential expression analysis
│   ├── Gene set enrichment analysis
│   ├── Clustering and classification
│   └── Biological interpretation
├── Evaluation
│   ├── Code correctness (executes without error)
│   ├── Statistical validity (appropriate tests)
│   ├── Result accuracy (vs ground truth)
│   └── Interpretation quality (biological insight)
└── Baselines
    ├── GPT-4 agent
    ├── Claude agent
    └── Domain-specific fine-tuned models

Usage

from genotex import GenoTEXBenchmark

bench = GenoTEXBenchmark()

# List available tasks
tasks = bench.list_tasks()
for task in tasks[:5]:
    print(f"Task: {task.id}")
    print(f"  Dataset: {task.geo_accession}")
    print(f"  Category: {task.category}")
    print(f"  Difficulty: {task.difficulty}")

# Get a specific task
task = bench.get_task("GSE12345_DEG")
print(f"Description: {task.description}")
print(f"Input files: {task.input_files}")
print(f"Expected output: {task.expected_output_type}")

Running Evaluations

# Evaluate an agent on GenoTEX
from genotex import evaluate_agent

results = evaluate_agent(
    agent_fn=my_agent_function,
    tasks="all",            # or specific task IDs
    timeout_per_task=300,   # seconds
)

print(f"Tasks completed: {results.completed}/{results.total}")
print(f"Code correctness: {results.code_correct_rate:.1%}")
print(f"Statistical validity: {results.stats_valid_rate:.1%}")
print(f"Result accuracy: {results.accuracy:.3f}")

Task Examples

# Example: Differential Expression Analysis
task = {
    "id": "GSE12345_DEG",
    "description": "Identify differentially expressed genes "
                   "between treatment and control groups in "
                   "this RNA-seq dataset.",
    "input": "GSE12345_counts.csv",  # Raw count matrix
    "metadata": "GSE12345_metadata.csv",  # Sample info
    "expected": {
        "method": "DESeq2 or limma-voom",
        "output": "DEG table with log2FC, p-value, adj.p",
        "ground_truth": "GSE12345_deg_truth.csv",
    },
}

# Example: Gene Set Enrichment
task = {
    "id": "GSE12345_GSEA",
    "description": "Perform gene set enrichment analysis on "
                   "the DEGs and identify enriched pathways.",
    "input": "GSE12345_deg_results.csv",
    "expected": {
        "method": "fgsea, clusterProfiler, or enrichR",
        "output": "Enriched pathways with NES and FDR",
    },
}

Use Cases

  1. Agent evaluation: Test bioinformatics agents on real tasks
  2. Method comparison: Compare LLM agents on genomics
  3. Benchmark development: Extend with new GEO datasets
  4. Teaching: Standard tasks for bioinformatics education
  5. Tool development: Test new analysis pipelines

References

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.