agentsclimarketplace

System profile

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/42-wanshuiyin-ARIS/skills/system-profile

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill system-profile

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Profile a target (script, process, GPU, memory, interconnect) using external tools and code instrumentation. Produces structured performance reports with actionable recommendations. Use when user says "profile", "benchmark", "bottleneck", or wants performance analysis.

SKILL.md

4.5 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

System Profile

Profile the specified target and summarize the results. Target: $ARGUMENTS

Instructions

You are a profiling assistant. Based on the user's target, choose appropriate profiling strategies, including writing instrumentation code when needed, then run profiling, analyze results, and produce a summary.

Step 1: Determine the profiling target

Parse $ARGUMENTS to understand what to profile. Examples:

  • A Python script or module
  • A running process (PID or service name)
  • A specific function or code block
  • An entire framework or system (e.g., "autogen", "vllm serving") — profile its end-to-end execution, identify bottlenecks across components
  • "gpu" / "interconnect" / "memory" for focused profiling

If $ARGUMENTS is empty or unclear, ask the user.

Step 2: Choose profiling methods

Select from external tools and/or code instrumentation as appropriate. Don't limit yourself to the examples below — use whatever makes sense for the target.

External tools (check availability first):

  • CPU: cProfile, py-spy, line_profiler, perf stat, /usr/bin/time -v
  • Memory: tracemalloc, memory_profiler, memray
  • GPU: nvidia-smi, nvidia-smi dmon, nvitop, torch.profiler, nsys
  • Interconnect: nvidia-smi topo -m, nvidia-smi nvlink, NCCL_DEBUG=INFO
  • System: strace -c, iostat, vmstat

Code instrumentation — when external tools are insufficient, write and insert profiling code into the target. Typical scenarios:

  • Timing specific code blocks (wall time vs CPU time)
  • Measuring CPU-GPU or GPU-GPU transfer size, frequency, and bandwidth
  • Tracking memory allocation across CPU and GPU to detect redundancy
  • Wrapping NCCL collectives to measure latency and throughput
  • Adding CUDA event timing around kernels

Design the instrumentation based on what you observe in the code — don't use a fixed template.

Step 3: Key dimensions to investigate

Depending on the target, focus on some or all of these:

CPU overhead

  • Context switching (voluntary / involuntary)
  • CPU utilization: ratio of CPU time to wall time
  • Per-function execution time hotspots

Memory overhead

  • CPU and GPU memory usage (allocated vs reserved vs peak)
  • Redundant replication: same data living on both CPU and GPU
  • Per-device allocation balance in multi-GPU setups

Interconnect & communication

  • CPU-GPU transfer: frequency, per-transfer size, total volume, bandwidth achieved
  • GPU-GPU transfer: P2P bandwidth, NVLink vs PCIe topology impact
  • NCCL collectives: operation type, message size distribution, latency
  • Communication-to-computation ratio

GPU compute

  • SM utilization, kernel launch overhead
  • Memory bandwidth utilization vs peak

Step 4: Instrumentation guidelines

When inserting code into the target:

  1. Read and understand the target code first
  2. Prefer wrapping (decorator, context manager, standalone runner) over inline edits
  3. If inline edits are necessary, mark them clearly (e.g., # [PROFILE] comments)
  4. Minimize observer effect — don't instrument tight inner loops; sample instead
  5. Collect results into a structured log, don't scatter print statements

Step 5: Run profiling

  1. Check available tools and hardware topology
  2. Run the chosen methods, capture all output
  3. Save artifacts (flamegraphs, traces, logs) to ./profile_output/

Step 6: Produce the report

Part A — Profiling results (structured tables by dimension, as applicable):

  • CPU overhead table
  • Memory overhead table (with redundancy column)
  • Interconnect table (transfer type / frequency / size / latency / bandwidth)
  • Hotspots / bottleneck identification
  • Actionable recommendations ranked by expected impact

Part B — Instrumentation changelog (MANDATORY): List every file that was modified or created for profiling purposes:

FileChange typeWhat was added/modifiedLine(s)
...modified......
...created...

This allows the user to review and revert all instrumentation changes. Offer to clean up (remove all instrumentation) when the user is done.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.