Research ideation
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill research-ideationAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Generate structured research questions, hypotheses, and empirical strategies from a topic or dataset within the sewage/environmental economics space. This skill should be used when asked to "brainstorm research questions", "what else can we do with this data", "research ideas", or "ideation".
SKILL.md
4.4 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Research Ideation
Generate structured research questions, testable hypotheses, and empirical strategies from a topic, phenomenon, or dataset.
Input: $ARGUMENTS — a topic, phenomenon, dataset description, or extensions to brainstorm extensions of the current paper.
Project-Specific Context
Available Data
- EDM data (2021-2024+): Event-level sewage spill records for all overflow sites in England
- Land Registry: Universe of property transactions (prices, dates, postcodes)
- Zoopla: Rental listings with prices and characteristics
- Met Office: Daily rainfall at LSOA level
- River networks: PostGIS topology of English waterways
- Annual returns: Water company infrastructure data (sewer capacity, population served)
- Geographic boundaries: LSOAs, MSOAs, constituencies, water company areas
Existing Identification Strategies
Hedonic, repeat sales, long difference, DiD with media coverage, upstream/downstream, dry spills, hydraulic capacity IV
Related Literature Areas
Environmental disamenity capitalisation, water quality and property values, UK water industry regulation, infrastructure and house prices, information and price discovery
Workflow
Step 1: Understand the Input
Read $ARGUMENTS and any referenced files.
- If
extensions: read current manuscript sections and analysis scripts to understand what's been done - If a topic: ground it in the available data and methods
Step 2: Generate 3-5 Research Questions
Order from descriptive to causal:
- Descriptive: What are the patterns? (e.g. "How do spill frequencies vary across water companies?")
- Correlational: What factors are associated? (e.g. "Is sewer age correlated with spill frequency after controlling for rainfall?")
- Causal: What is the effect? (e.g. "What is the causal effect of media coverage of sewage spills on house prices?")
- Mechanism: Why does the effect exist? (e.g. "Do dry spills affect prices through stigma or physical damage?")
- Policy: What are the implications? (e.g. "Would mandated real-time spill disclosure affect property markets?")
Step 3: Develop Each Question
For each:
- Hypothesis: Testable prediction with expected sign/magnitude
- Identification strategy: How to establish causality
- Data requirements: What data is needed — is it available in the project?
- Key assumptions: What must hold
- Potential pitfalls: Threats to identification
- Related literature: 2-3 papers using similar approaches
Step 4: Rank by Feasibility and Contribution
| RQ | Feasibility | Contribution | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High/Med/Low | High/Med/Low | ... |
Step 5: Save Output
# Research Ideation: [Topic]
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Overview
[1-2 paragraphs situating the topic]
## Research Questions
### RQ1: [Question] (Feasibility: High/Medium/Low)
**Type:** Descriptive / Correlational / Causal / Mechanism / Policy
**Hypothesis:** [Prediction]
**Identification:** [Method + key assumption]
**Data:** [What's needed and what's available]
**Pitfalls:** [Top 2 threats]
**Related work:** [2-3 papers]
## Ranking
[Table]
## Suggested Next Steps
1. [Most promising direction]
2. [Data to obtain or analysis to run]
3. [Literature to review]
Save to output/log/research_ideation_[topic].md.
Principles
- Be creative but grounded. Every suggestion must be empirically feasible with available or obtainable data.
- Think like a referee. For each causal question, immediately identify the identification challenge.
- Leverage existing infrastructure. The project already has spatial matching, spill aggregation, and river network tools — build on them.
- Consider data availability. Flag when data is already available vs needs to be obtained.
- Extensions are valuable. For
extensions, focus on questions that use the same data infrastructure but ask different questions.