agentsclimarketplace

Slide excellence

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/41-sticerd-eee-sewage-econometrics-check/skills/slide-excellence

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库，覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文，并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill slide-excellence

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Multi-agent review for research presentation slides in the sewage-house-prices project (visual, econometric fidelity, proofreading, substance). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.

SKILL.md

2.9 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Slide Excellence Review

Run a comprehensive multi-dimensional review of research presentation slides. Multiple agents analyze the file independently, then results are synthesized.

Steps

1. Identify the File

Parse $ARGUMENTS for the filename. Resolve path in docs/conferences/.

2. Run Review Agents in Parallel

Agent 1: Visual Audit (slide-auditor)

  • Overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, spacing, images
  • Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_visual_audit.md

Agent 2: Econometric Fidelity Review (econometrics-reviewer)

  • Every quantitative claim on slides must be traceable to the paper (docs/overleaf/_main.tex)
  • Check: coefficients, standard errors, sample sizes, p-values match paper tables/figures
  • Check: identification strategy correctly described (hedonic pricing, repeat sales, long-difference, DiD, upstream/downstream)
  • Check: treatment variables defined correctly (spill_count/spill_hrs, 12/24hr counting methodology)
  • Check: confidence intervals and significance stars consistent with paper
  • Check: no causal language without identification support
  • Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_econometrics_report.md

Agent 3: Proofreading (proofreader)

  • Grammar, typos, consistency, academic quality, citations
  • Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_report.md

Agent 4: TikZ Review (only if file contains TikZ)

  • Label overlaps, geometric accuracy, visual semantics
  • Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_tikz_review.md

Agent 5: Substance Review (domain correctness)

  • Verify environmental economics claims are accurate
  • Check EDM/water company institutional context is correct
  • Verify spatial econometrics descriptions match methodology
  • Check hedonic pricing theory correctly invoked
  • Verify England housing market characterisation
  • Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_substance_review.md

3. Synthesize Combined Summary

# Slide Excellence Review: [Filename]

## Overall Quality Score: [EXCELLENT / GOOD / NEEDS WORK / POOR]

| Dimension | Critical | Medium | Low |
|-----------|----------|--------|-----|
| Visual/Layout | | | |
| Econometric Fidelity | | | |
| Proofreading | | | |
| Substance | | | |

### Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
### Medium Issues (Next Revision)
### Recommended Next Steps

Quality Score Rubric

ScoreCriticalMediumMeaning
Excellent0-20-5Ready to present
Good3-56-15Minor refinements
Needs Work6-1016-30Significant revision
Poor11+31+Major restructuring

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.