Slide excellence

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/41-sticerd-eee-sewage-econometrics-check/skills/slide-excellence

Multi-agent review for research presentation slides in the sewage-house-prices project (visual, econometric fidelity, proofreading, substance). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.From its SKILL.md

Install

npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill slide-excellence

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

SKILL.md

2.9 KB, 628 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Slide Excellence Review

Run a comprehensive multi-dimensional review of research presentation slides. Multiple agents analyze the file independently, then results are synthesized.

Steps

1. Identify the File

Parse $ARGUMENTS for the filename. Resolve path in docs/conferences/.

2. Run Review Agents in Parallel

Agent 1: Visual Audit (slide-auditor)

Overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, spacing, images
Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_visual_audit.md

Agent 2: Econometric Fidelity Review (econometrics-reviewer)

Every quantitative claim on slides must be traceable to the paper (docs/overleaf/_main.tex)
Check: coefficients, standard errors, sample sizes, p-values match paper tables/figures
Check: identification strategy correctly described (hedonic pricing, repeat sales, long-difference, DiD, upstream/downstream)
Check: treatment variables defined correctly (spill_count/spill_hrs, 12/24hr counting methodology)
Check: confidence intervals and significance stars consistent with paper
Check: no causal language without identification support
Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_econometrics_report.md

Agent 3: Proofreading (proofreader)

Grammar, typos, consistency, academic quality, citations
Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_report.md

Agent 4: TikZ Review (only if file contains TikZ)

Label overlaps, geometric accuracy, visual semantics
Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_tikz_review.md

Agent 5: Substance Review (domain correctness)

Verify environmental economics claims are accurate
Check EDM/water company institutional context is correct
Verify spatial econometrics descriptions match methodology
Check hedonic pricing theory correctly invoked
Verify England housing market characterisation
Save: docs/conferences/quality_reports/[FILE]_substance_review.md

3. Synthesize Combined Summary

# Slide Excellence Review: [Filename]

## Overall Quality Score: [EXCELLENT / GOOD / NEEDS WORK / POOR]

| Dimension | Critical | Medium | Low |
|-----------|----------|--------|-----|
| Visual/Layout | | | |
| Econometric Fidelity | | | |
| Proofreading | | | |
| Substance | | | |

### Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
### Medium Issues (Next Revision)
### Recommended Next Steps

Quality Score Rubric

Score	Critical	Medium	Meaning
Excellent	0-2	0-5	Ready to present
Good	3-5	6-15	Minor refinements
Needs Work	6-10	16-30	Significant revision
Poor	11+	31+	Major restructuring

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.