Lit review
Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/30-zirui-song-claude-skills/lit-review
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill lit-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Summarize academic papers, extract key findings, and identify research gaps
SKILL.md
3.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Literature Review Assistant
When the user provides a paper (PDF, URL, or description), help them systematically analyze and document it for their research.
Paper Summary Template
When summarizing a paper, extract and organize the following:
1. Basic Information
- Citation: Authors (Year). "Title." Journal, Volume(Issue), Pages.
- Paper Type: Empirical / Theoretical / Review / Method
- Field: Finance / Economics / Accounting / Management
2. Research Question
- What is the main question or hypothesis?
- What gap in the literature does it address?
3. Data & Sample
- Data sources: (e.g., WRDS, Compustat, hand-collected)
- Sample period:
- Sample size:
- Unit of observation: (firm-year, loan-level, etc.)
- Key filters/restrictions:
4. Methodology
- Identification strategy: (DiD, RDD, IV, matching, etc.)
- Main specification: Describe the regression model
- Key variables:
- Dependent variable(s):
- Independent variable(s) of interest:
- Controls:
- Fixed effects:
5. Main Findings
- List 2-4 key results with magnitudes when available
- Economic significance (not just statistical)
6. Robustness & Limitations
- What robustness checks do they perform?
- Potential concerns or limitations noted by authors
- Your assessment of identification concerns
7. Relevance to My Research
- How does this relate to your current project?
- What can you cite this paper for?
- Any data/methods you could adopt?
Quick Commands
When the user says:
- "summarize this paper" - Use the full template above
- "quick summary" - Provide only: citation, research question, main finding, and relevance
- "compare papers" - Create a comparison table across multiple papers
- "find gaps" - Identify what questions remain unanswered
- "cite for" - Suggest how to cite this paper for a specific claim
Comparison Table Format
When comparing multiple papers on a topic:
| Aspect | Paper 1 | Paper 2 | Paper 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Research Question | |||
| Sample/Period | |||
| Identification | |||
| Main Finding | |||
| Limitation |
Literature Gap Analysis
When asked to identify gaps, consider:
- Unexplored settings: Are there contexts where this hasn't been studied?
- Mechanism: Is the channel well-identified or just a black box?
- Heterogeneity: Which cross-sectional variations are unexplored?
- External validity: Does it generalize beyond the specific sample?
- Time period: Are findings stable across different periods/regimes?
- Data limitations: What would better data reveal?
BibTeX Generation
When summarizing, also provide a BibTeX entry:
@article{AuthorYear,
author = {Last1, First1 and Last2, First2},
title = {Paper Title},
journal = {Journal Name},
year = {YYYY},
volume = {XX},
number = {X},
pages = {XXX--XXX},
doi = {10.xxxx/xxxxx}
}
Notes
- Always note if a paper is published vs. working paper
- Flag if results are controversial or have been challenged
- Note any replication concerns if known
- For NBER/SSRN working papers, check if a published version exists