Algorithm designer
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill algorithm-designerAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Design and document statistical algorithms with pseudocode and complexity analysis
SKILL.md
13.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Algorithm Designer
You are an expert in designing and documenting statistical algorithms.
Algorithm Documentation Standards
Required Components
- Purpose: What problem does this solve?
- Input/Output: Precise specifications
- Pseudocode: Language-agnostic description
- Complexity: Time and space analysis
- Convergence: Conditions and guarantees
- Implementation notes: Practical considerations
Input/Output Specification
Formal Specification Template
Every algorithm must have precise input/output documentation:
INPUT SPECIFICATION:
- Data: D = {(Y_i, A_i, M_i, X_i)}_{i=1}^n where:
- Y_i ∈ ℝ (continuous outcome)
- A_i ∈ {0,1} (binary treatment)
- M_i ∈ ℝ^d (d-dimensional mediator)
- X_i ∈ ℝ^p (p covariates)
- Parameters: θ ∈ Θ ⊆ ℝ^k (parameter space)
- Tolerance: ε > 0 (convergence criterion)
- Max iterations: T_max ∈ ℕ
OUTPUT SPECIFICATION:
- Estimate: θ̂ ∈ ℝ^k (point estimate)
- Variance: V̂ ∈ ℝ^{k×k} (covariance matrix)
- Convergence: boolean (did algorithm converge?)
- Iterations: t ∈ ℕ (iterations used)
# R implementation of formal I/O specification
define_algorithm_io <- function() {
list(
input = list(
data = "data.frame with columns Y, A, M, X",
params = "list(tol = 1e-6, max_iter = 1000)",
models = "list(outcome_formula, mediator_formula, propensity_formula)"
),
output = list(
estimate = "numeric vector of parameter estimates",
se = "numeric vector of standard errors",
vcov = "variance-covariance matrix",
converged = "logical indicating convergence",
iterations = "integer count of iterations"
),
complexity = list(
time = "O(n * p^2) per iteration",
space = "O(n * p)",
iterations = "O(log(1/epsilon)) for Newton-type"
)
)
}
Convergence Criteria
Standard Convergence Conditions
| Criterion | Formula | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute | $|\theta^{(t+1)} - \theta^{(t)}| < \varepsilon$ | Parameter convergence |
| Relative | $|\theta^{(t+1)} - \theta^{(t)}|/|\theta^{(t)}| < \varepsilon$ | Scale-invariant |
| Gradient | $|\nabla L(\theta^{(t)})| < \varepsilon$ | Optimization |
| Function | $|L(\theta^{(t+1)}) - L(\theta^{(t)})| < \varepsilon$ | Objective convergence |
| Cauchy | $\max_{i} | \theta_i^{(t+1)} - \theta_i^{(t)} |
Mathematical Formulation
Convergence tolerance: $\varepsilon = 10^{-6}$ (typical default)
Standard tolerances by application:
- Numerical optimization: $\varepsilon = 10^{-8}$
- Statistical estimation: $\varepsilon = 10^{-6}$
- Approximate methods: $\varepsilon = 10^{-4}$
Complexity Formulas
Linear complexity $O(n)$: Operations grow proportionally to input size $$T(n) = c \cdot n + O(1)$$
Quadratic complexity $O(n^2)$: Nested iterations over input $$T(n) = c \cdot n^2 + O(n)$$
Linearithmic complexity $O(n \log n)$: Divide-and-conquer with linear work per level $$T(n) = c \cdot n \log_2 n + O(n)$$
Space-Time Tradeoff: $$\text{Time} \times \text{Space} \geq \Omega(\text{Information Content})$$
Convergence rate analysis:
- Linear convergence: $|\theta^{(t)} - \theta^*| \leq C \cdot \rho^t$ where $0 < \rho < 1$
- Quadratic convergence: $|\theta^{(t+1)} - \theta^| \leq C \cdot |\theta^{(t)} - \theta^|^2$
- Superlinear: $\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{|\theta^{(t+1)} - \theta^|}{|\theta^{(t)} - \theta^|} = 0$
# Comprehensive convergence checking
check_convergence <- function(theta_new, theta_old, gradient = NULL,
objective_new = NULL, objective_old = NULL,
tol = 1e-6, method = "relative") {
switch(method,
"absolute" = {
# |θ^(t+1) - θ^t| < ε
converged <- max(abs(theta_new - theta_old)) < tol
criterion <- max(abs(theta_new - theta_old))
},
"relative" = {
# |θ^(t+1) - θ^t| / |θ^t| < ε
denom <- pmax(abs(theta_old), 1) # Avoid division by zero
converged <- max(abs(theta_new - theta_old) / denom) < tol
criterion <- max(abs(theta_new - theta_old) / denom)
},
"gradient" = {
# |∇L(θ)| < ε
stopifnot(!is.null(gradient))
converged <- sqrt(sum(gradient^2)) < tol
criterion <- sqrt(sum(gradient^2))
},
"objective" = {
# |L(θ^(t+1)) - L(θ^t)| < ε
stopifnot(!is.null(objective_new), !is.null(objective_old))
converged <- abs(objective_new - objective_old) < tol
criterion <- abs(objective_new - objective_old)
}
)
list(converged = converged, criterion = criterion, method = method)
}
# Newton-Raphson with convergence monitoring
newton_raphson <- function(f, grad, hess, theta0, tol = 1e-6, max_iter = 100) {
theta <- theta0
history <- list()
for (t in 1:max_iter) {
g <- grad(theta)
H <- hess(theta)
# Newton step: θ^(t+1) = θ^t - H^(-1) * g
# Time complexity: O(p^3) for matrix inversion
delta <- solve(H, g)
theta_new <- theta - delta
# Check convergence
conv <- check_convergence(theta_new, theta, gradient = g, tol = tol)
history[[t]] <- list(theta = theta, gradient_norm = sqrt(sum(g^2)))
if (conv$converged) {
return(list(
estimate = theta_new,
iterations = t,
converged = TRUE,
history = history
))
}
theta <- theta_new
}
list(estimate = theta, iterations = max_iter, converged = FALSE, history = history)
}
Complexity and Convergence Relationship
| Algorithm | Convergence Rate | Iterations to $\varepsilon$ |
|---|---|---|
| Gradient Descent | $O(1/t)$ | $O(1/\varepsilon)$ |
| Accelerated GD | $O(1/t^2)$ | $O(1/\sqrt{\varepsilon})$ |
| Newton-Raphson | Quadratic | $O(\log\log(1/\varepsilon))$ |
| EM Algorithm | Linear | $O(\log(1/\varepsilon))$ |
| Coordinate Descent | Linear | $O(p \cdot \log(1/\varepsilon))$ |
Pseudocode Conventions
Standard Format
ALGORITHM: [Name]
INPUT: [List inputs with types]
OUTPUT: [List outputs with types]
1. [Initialize]
2. [Main loop or procedure]
2.1 [Sub-step]
2.2 [Sub-step]
3. [Return]
Example: AIPW Estimator
ALGORITHM: Augmented IPW for Mediation
INPUT:
- Data (Y, A, M, X) of size n
- Propensity model specification
- Outcome model specification
- Mediator model specification
OUTPUT:
- Point estimate ψ̂
- Standard error SE(ψ̂)
- 95% confidence interval
1. ESTIMATE NUISANCE FUNCTIONS
1.1 Fit propensity score: π̂(x) = P̂(A=1|X=x)
1.2 Fit mediator density: f̂(m|a,x)
1.3 Fit outcome regression: μ̂(a,m,x) = Ê[Y|A=a,M=m,X=x]
2. COMPUTE PSEUDO-OUTCOMES
For i = 1 to n:
2.1 Compute IPW weight: w_i = A_i/π̂(X_i) + (1-A_i)/(1-π̂(X_i))
2.2 Compute outcome prediction: μ̂_i = μ̂(A_i, M_i, X_i)
2.3 Compute augmentation term
2.4 φ_i = w_i(Y_i - μ̂_i) + [integration term]
3. ESTIMATE AND INFERENCE
3.1 ψ̂ = n⁻¹ Σᵢ φ_i
3.2 SE = √(n⁻¹ Σᵢ (φ_i - ψ̂)²)
3.3 CI = [ψ̂ - 1.96·SE, ψ̂ + 1.96·SE]
4. RETURN (ψ̂, SE, CI)
Complexity Analysis
Big-O Notation Guide
Formal Definition: $f(n) = O(g(n))$ if $\exists c, n_0$ such that $f(n) \leq c \cdot g(n)$ for all $n \geq n_0$
| Complexity | Name | Example | Operations at n=1000 |
|---|---|---|---|
| $O(1)$ | Constant | Array access | 1 |
| $O(\log n)$ | Logarithmic | Binary search | ~10 |
| $O(n)$ | Linear | Single loop | 1,000 |
| $O(n \log n)$ | Linearithmic | Merge sort, FFT | ~10,000 |
| $O(n^2)$ | Quadratic | Nested loops | 1,000,000 |
| $O(n^3)$ | Cubic | Matrix multiplication | 1,000,000,000 |
| $O(2^n)$ | Exponential | Subset enumeration | ~10^301 |
Key Formulas
Master Theorem for recurrences $T(n) = aT(n/b) + f(n)$:
- If $f(n) = O(n^{\log_b a - \epsilon})$ then $T(n) = \Theta(n^{\log_b a})$
- If $f(n) = \Theta(n^{\log_b a})$ then $T(n) = \Theta(n^{\log_b a} \log n)$
- If $f(n) = \Omega(n^{\log_b a + \epsilon})$ then $T(n) = \Theta(f(n))$
Sorting lower bound: Any comparison-based sort requires $\Omega(n \log n)$ comparisons
Matrix operations:
- Naive multiplication: $O(n^3)$
- Strassen: $O(n^{2.807})$
- Matrix inversion: $O(n^3)$ (same as multiplication)
# Complexity analysis helper
analyze_complexity <- function(f, n_values = c(100, 500, 1000, 5000)) {
times <- sapply(n_values, function(n) {
system.time(f(n))[["elapsed"]]
})
# Fit log-log regression to estimate complexity
fit <- lm(log(times) ~ log(n_values))
estimated_power <- coef(fit)[2]
list(
times = data.frame(n = n_values, time = times),
estimated_complexity = paste0("O(n^", round(estimated_power, 2), ")"),
power = estimated_power
)
}
Statistical Algorithm Complexities
| Algorithm | Time | Space |
|---|---|---|
| OLS | O(np² + p³) | O(np) |
| Logistic (Newton) | O(np² + p³) per iter | O(np) |
| Bootstrap (B reps) | O(B × base) | O(n) |
| MCMC (T iters) | O(T × per_iter) | O(n + T) |
| Cross-validation (K) | O(K × base) | O(n) |
| Random forest | O(n log n × B × p) | O(n × B) |
Template for Analysis
TIME COMPLEXITY:
- Initialization: O(...)
- Per iteration: O(...)
- Total (T iterations): O(...)
- Convergence typically in T = O(...) iterations
SPACE COMPLEXITY:
- Data storage: O(n × p)
- Working memory: O(...)
- Output: O(...)
Convergence Analysis
Types of Convergence
- Finite termination: Exact solution in finite steps
- Linear: $|x_{k+1} - x^| \leq c|x_k - x^|$, $c < 1$
- Superlinear: $|x_{k+1} - x^| / |x_k - x^| \to 0$
- Quadratic: $|x_{k+1} - x^| \leq c|x_k - x^|^2$
Convergence Documentation Template
CONVERGENCE:
- Type: [Linear/Superlinear/Quadratic]
- Rate: [Expression]
- Conditions: [What must hold]
- Stopping criterion: [When to stop]
- Typical iterations: [Order of magnitude]
Optimization Algorithms
Gradient-Based Methods
ALGORITHM: Gradient Descent
INPUT: f (objective), ∇f (gradient), x₀ (initial), η (step size), ε (tolerance)
OUTPUT: x* (minimizer)
1. k ← 0
2. WHILE ‖∇f(xₖ)‖ > ε:
2.1 xₖ₊₁ ← xₖ - η∇f(xₖ)
2.2 k ← k + 1
3. RETURN xₖ
COMPLEXITY: O(iterations × gradient_cost)
CONVERGENCE: Linear with rate (1 - η·μ) for μ-strongly convex f
Newton's Method
ALGORITHM: Newton-Raphson
INPUT: f, ∇f, ∇²f, x₀, ε
OUTPUT: x*
1. k ← 0
2. WHILE ‖∇f(xₖ)‖ > ε:
2.1 Solve ∇²f(xₖ)·d = -∇f(xₖ) for direction d
2.2 xₖ₊₁ ← xₖ + d
2.3 k ← k + 1
3. RETURN xₖ
COMPLEXITY: O(iterations × p³) for p-dimensional
CONVERGENCE: Quadratic near solution
EM Algorithm Template
ALGORITHM: Expectation-Maximization
INPUT: Data Y, model parameters θ₀, tolerance ε
OUTPUT: MLE θ̂
1. θ ← θ₀
2. REPEAT:
2.1 E-STEP: Compute Q(θ'|θ) = E[log L(θ'|Y,Z) | Y, θ]
2.2 M-STEP: θ_new ← argmax_θ' Q(θ'|θ)
2.3 Δ ← |θ_new - θ|
2.4 θ ← θ_new
3. UNTIL Δ < ε
4. RETURN θ
CONVERGENCE: Monotonic increase in likelihood
Linear rate near optimum
Bootstrap Algorithms
Nonparametric Bootstrap
ALGORITHM: Nonparametric Bootstrap
INPUT: Data X of size n, statistic T, B (number of replicates)
OUTPUT: SE estimate, CI
1. FOR b = 1 to B:
1.1 Draw X*_b by sampling n observations with replacement from X
1.2 Compute T*_b = T(X*_b)
2. SE_boot ← SD({T*_1, ..., T*_B})
3. CI_percentile ← [quantile(T*, 0.025), quantile(T*, 0.975)]
4. RETURN (SE_boot, CI_percentile)
COMPLEXITY: O(B × cost(T))
NOTES: B ≥ 1000 for SE, B ≥ 10000 for percentile CI
Parametric Bootstrap
ALGORITHM: Parametric Bootstrap
INPUT: Data X, parametric model M, B replicates
OUTPUT: SE estimate
1. Fit θ̂ = MLE(X, M)
2. FOR b = 1 to B:
2.1 Generate X*_b ~ M(θ̂)
2.2 Compute θ̂*_b = MLE(X*_b, M)
3. SE_boot ← SD({θ̂*_1, ..., θ̂*_B})
4. RETURN SE_boot
Numerical Stability Notes
Common Issues
- Overflow/Underflow: Work on log scale
- Cancellation: Reformulate subtractions
- Ill-conditioning: Use regularization or pivoting
- Convergence: Add damping or line search
Stability Techniques
# Log-sum-exp trick
log_sum_exp <- function(x) {
max_x <- max(x)
max_x + log(sum(exp(x - max_x)))
}
# Numerically stable variance
stable_var <- function(x) {
n <- length(x)
m <- mean(x)
sum((x - m)^2) / (n - 1) # One-pass with correction
}
Implementation Checklist
Before Coding
- Pseudocode written and reviewed
- Complexity analyzed
- Convergence conditions identified
- Edge cases documented
- Numerical stability considered
During Implementation
- Match pseudocode structure
- Add convergence monitoring
- Handle edge cases
- Log intermediate values (debug mode)
- Add early stopping
After Implementation
- Unit tests for components
- Integration tests for full algorithm
- Benchmark against reference implementation
- Profile for bottlenecks
- Document deviations from pseudocode
Key References
- CLRS
- Numerical Recipes