agentsclimarketplace

Algorithm designer

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/26-Data-Wise-scholar/skills/implementation/algorithm-designer

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill algorithm-designer

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Design and document statistical algorithms with pseudocode and complexity analysis

SKILL.md

13.1 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Algorithm Designer

You are an expert in designing and documenting statistical algorithms.

Algorithm Documentation Standards

Required Components

  1. Purpose: What problem does this solve?
  2. Input/Output: Precise specifications
  3. Pseudocode: Language-agnostic description
  4. Complexity: Time and space analysis
  5. Convergence: Conditions and guarantees
  6. Implementation notes: Practical considerations

Input/Output Specification

Formal Specification Template

Every algorithm must have precise input/output documentation:

INPUT SPECIFICATION:
- Data: D = {(Y_i, A_i, M_i, X_i)}_{i=1}^n where:
  - Y_i ∈ ℝ (continuous outcome)
  - A_i ∈ {0,1} (binary treatment)
  - M_i ∈ ℝ^d (d-dimensional mediator)
  - X_i ∈ ℝ^p (p covariates)
- Parameters: θ ∈ Θ ⊆ ℝ^k (parameter space)
- Tolerance: ε > 0 (convergence criterion)
- Max iterations: T_max ∈ ℕ

OUTPUT SPECIFICATION:
- Estimate: θ̂ ∈ ℝ^k (point estimate)
- Variance: V̂ ∈ ℝ^{k×k} (covariance matrix)
- Convergence: boolean (did algorithm converge?)
- Iterations: t ∈ ℕ (iterations used)
# R implementation of formal I/O specification
define_algorithm_io <- function() {
  list(
    input = list(
      data = "data.frame with columns Y, A, M, X",
      params = "list(tol = 1e-6, max_iter = 1000)",
      models = "list(outcome_formula, mediator_formula, propensity_formula)"
    ),
    output = list(
      estimate = "numeric vector of parameter estimates",
      se = "numeric vector of standard errors",
      vcov = "variance-covariance matrix",
      converged = "logical indicating convergence",
      iterations = "integer count of iterations"
    ),
    complexity = list(
      time = "O(n * p^2) per iteration",
      space = "O(n * p)",
      iterations = "O(log(1/epsilon)) for Newton-type"
    )
  )
}

Convergence Criteria

Standard Convergence Conditions

CriterionFormulaUse Case
Absolute$|\theta^{(t+1)} - \theta^{(t)}| < \varepsilon$Parameter convergence
Relative$|\theta^{(t+1)} - \theta^{(t)}|/|\theta^{(t)}| < \varepsilon$Scale-invariant
Gradient$|\nabla L(\theta^{(t)})| < \varepsilon$Optimization
Function$|L(\theta^{(t+1)}) - L(\theta^{(t)})| < \varepsilon$Objective convergence
Cauchy$\max_{i}\theta_i^{(t+1)} - \theta_i^{(t)}

Mathematical Formulation

Convergence tolerance: $\varepsilon = 10^{-6}$ (typical default)

Standard tolerances by application:

  • Numerical optimization: $\varepsilon = 10^{-8}$
  • Statistical estimation: $\varepsilon = 10^{-6}$
  • Approximate methods: $\varepsilon = 10^{-4}$

Complexity Formulas

Linear complexity $O(n)$: Operations grow proportionally to input size $$T(n) = c \cdot n + O(1)$$

Quadratic complexity $O(n^2)$: Nested iterations over input $$T(n) = c \cdot n^2 + O(n)$$

Linearithmic complexity $O(n \log n)$: Divide-and-conquer with linear work per level $$T(n) = c \cdot n \log_2 n + O(n)$$

Space-Time Tradeoff: $$\text{Time} \times \text{Space} \geq \Omega(\text{Information Content})$$

Convergence rate analysis:

  • Linear convergence: $|\theta^{(t)} - \theta^*| \leq C \cdot \rho^t$ where $0 < \rho < 1$
  • Quadratic convergence: $|\theta^{(t+1)} - \theta^| \leq C \cdot |\theta^{(t)} - \theta^|^2$
  • Superlinear: $\lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{|\theta^{(t+1)} - \theta^|}{|\theta^{(t)} - \theta^|} = 0$
# Comprehensive convergence checking
check_convergence <- function(theta_new, theta_old, gradient = NULL,
                              objective_new = NULL, objective_old = NULL,
                              tol = 1e-6, method = "relative") {
  switch(method,
    "absolute" = {
      # |θ^(t+1) - θ^t| < ε
      converged <- max(abs(theta_new - theta_old)) < tol
      criterion <- max(abs(theta_new - theta_old))
    },
    "relative" = {
      # |θ^(t+1) - θ^t| / |θ^t| < ε
      denom <- pmax(abs(theta_old), 1)  # Avoid division by zero
      converged <- max(abs(theta_new - theta_old) / denom) < tol
      criterion <- max(abs(theta_new - theta_old) / denom)
    },
    "gradient" = {
      # |∇L(θ)| < ε
      stopifnot(!is.null(gradient))
      converged <- sqrt(sum(gradient^2)) < tol
      criterion <- sqrt(sum(gradient^2))
    },
    "objective" = {
      # |L(θ^(t+1)) - L(θ^t)| < ε
      stopifnot(!is.null(objective_new), !is.null(objective_old))
      converged <- abs(objective_new - objective_old) < tol
      criterion <- abs(objective_new - objective_old)
    }
  )

  list(converged = converged, criterion = criterion, method = method)
}

# Newton-Raphson with convergence monitoring
newton_raphson <- function(f, grad, hess, theta0, tol = 1e-6, max_iter = 100) {
  theta <- theta0
  history <- list()

  for (t in 1:max_iter) {
    g <- grad(theta)
    H <- hess(theta)

    # Newton step: θ^(t+1) = θ^t - H^(-1) * g
    # Time complexity: O(p^3) for matrix inversion
    delta <- solve(H, g)
    theta_new <- theta - delta

    # Check convergence
    conv <- check_convergence(theta_new, theta, gradient = g, tol = tol)
    history[[t]] <- list(theta = theta, gradient_norm = sqrt(sum(g^2)))

    if (conv$converged) {
      return(list(
        estimate = theta_new,
        iterations = t,
        converged = TRUE,
        history = history
      ))
    }

    theta <- theta_new
  }

  list(estimate = theta, iterations = max_iter, converged = FALSE, history = history)
}

Complexity and Convergence Relationship

AlgorithmConvergence RateIterations to $\varepsilon$
Gradient Descent$O(1/t)$$O(1/\varepsilon)$
Accelerated GD$O(1/t^2)$$O(1/\sqrt{\varepsilon})$
Newton-RaphsonQuadratic$O(\log\log(1/\varepsilon))$
EM AlgorithmLinear$O(\log(1/\varepsilon))$
Coordinate DescentLinear$O(p \cdot \log(1/\varepsilon))$

Pseudocode Conventions

Standard Format

ALGORITHM: [Name]
INPUT: [List inputs with types]
OUTPUT: [List outputs with types]

1. [Initialize]
2. [Main loop or procedure]
   2.1 [Sub-step]
   2.2 [Sub-step]
3. [Return]

Example: AIPW Estimator

ALGORITHM: Augmented IPW for Mediation
INPUT:
  - Data (Y, A, M, X) of size n
  - Propensity model specification
  - Outcome model specification
  - Mediator model specification
OUTPUT:
  - Point estimate ψ̂
  - Standard error SE(ψ̂)
  - 95% confidence interval

1. ESTIMATE NUISANCE FUNCTIONS
   1.1 Fit propensity score: π̂(x) = P̂(A=1|X=x)
   1.2 Fit mediator density: f̂(m|a,x)
   1.3 Fit outcome regression: μ̂(a,m,x) = Ê[Y|A=a,M=m,X=x]

2. COMPUTE PSEUDO-OUTCOMES
   For i = 1 to n:
     2.1 Compute IPW weight: w_i = A_i/π̂(X_i) + (1-A_i)/(1-π̂(X_i))
     2.2 Compute outcome prediction: μ̂_i = μ̂(A_i, M_i, X_i)
     2.3 Compute augmentation term
     2.4 φ_i = w_i(Y_i - μ̂_i) + [integration term]

3. ESTIMATE AND INFERENCE
   3.1 ψ̂ = n⁻¹ Σᵢ φ_i
   3.2 SE = √(n⁻¹ Σᵢ (φ_i - ψ̂)²)
   3.3 CI = [ψ̂ - 1.96·SE, ψ̂ + 1.96·SE]

4. RETURN (ψ̂, SE, CI)

Complexity Analysis

Big-O Notation Guide

Formal Definition: $f(n) = O(g(n))$ if $\exists c, n_0$ such that $f(n) \leq c \cdot g(n)$ for all $n \geq n_0$

ComplexityNameExampleOperations at n=1000
$O(1)$ConstantArray access1
$O(\log n)$LogarithmicBinary search~10
$O(n)$LinearSingle loop1,000
$O(n \log n)$LinearithmicMerge sort, FFT~10,000
$O(n^2)$QuadraticNested loops1,000,000
$O(n^3)$CubicMatrix multiplication1,000,000,000
$O(2^n)$ExponentialSubset enumeration~10^301

Key Formulas

Master Theorem for recurrences $T(n) = aT(n/b) + f(n)$:

  • If $f(n) = O(n^{\log_b a - \epsilon})$ then $T(n) = \Theta(n^{\log_b a})$
  • If $f(n) = \Theta(n^{\log_b a})$ then $T(n) = \Theta(n^{\log_b a} \log n)$
  • If $f(n) = \Omega(n^{\log_b a + \epsilon})$ then $T(n) = \Theta(f(n))$

Sorting lower bound: Any comparison-based sort requires $\Omega(n \log n)$ comparisons

Matrix operations:

  • Naive multiplication: $O(n^3)$
  • Strassen: $O(n^{2.807})$
  • Matrix inversion: $O(n^3)$ (same as multiplication)
# Complexity analysis helper
analyze_complexity <- function(f, n_values = c(100, 500, 1000, 5000)) {
  times <- sapply(n_values, function(n) {
    system.time(f(n))[["elapsed"]]
  })

  # Fit log-log regression to estimate complexity
  fit <- lm(log(times) ~ log(n_values))
  estimated_power <- coef(fit)[2]

  list(
    times = data.frame(n = n_values, time = times),
    estimated_complexity = paste0("O(n^", round(estimated_power, 2), ")"),
    power = estimated_power
  )
}

Statistical Algorithm Complexities

AlgorithmTimeSpace
OLSO(np² + p³)O(np)
Logistic (Newton)O(np² + p³) per iterO(np)
Bootstrap (B reps)O(B × base)O(n)
MCMC (T iters)O(T × per_iter)O(n + T)
Cross-validation (K)O(K × base)O(n)
Random forestO(n log n × B × p)O(n × B)

Template for Analysis

TIME COMPLEXITY:
- Initialization: O(...)
- Per iteration: O(...)
- Total (T iterations): O(...)
- Convergence typically in T = O(...) iterations

SPACE COMPLEXITY:
- Data storage: O(n × p)
- Working memory: O(...)
- Output: O(...)

Convergence Analysis

Types of Convergence

  1. Finite termination: Exact solution in finite steps
  2. Linear: $|x_{k+1} - x^| \leq c|x_k - x^|$, $c < 1$
  3. Superlinear: $|x_{k+1} - x^| / |x_k - x^| \to 0$
  4. Quadratic: $|x_{k+1} - x^| \leq c|x_k - x^|^2$

Convergence Documentation Template

CONVERGENCE:
- Type: [Linear/Superlinear/Quadratic]
- Rate: [Expression]
- Conditions: [What must hold]
- Stopping criterion: [When to stop]
- Typical iterations: [Order of magnitude]

Optimization Algorithms

Gradient-Based Methods

ALGORITHM: Gradient Descent
INPUT: f (objective), ∇f (gradient), x₀ (initial), η (step size), ε (tolerance)
OUTPUT: x* (minimizer)

1. k ← 0
2. WHILE ‖∇f(xₖ)‖ > ε:
   2.1 xₖ₊₁ ← xₖ - η∇f(xₖ)
   2.2 k ← k + 1
3. RETURN xₖ

COMPLEXITY: O(iterations × gradient_cost)
CONVERGENCE: Linear with rate (1 - η·μ) for μ-strongly convex f

Newton's Method

ALGORITHM: Newton-Raphson
INPUT: f, ∇f, ∇²f, x₀, ε
OUTPUT: x*

1. k ← 0
2. WHILE ‖∇f(xₖ)‖ > ε:
   2.1 Solve ∇²f(xₖ)·d = -∇f(xₖ) for direction d
   2.2 xₖ₊₁ ← xₖ + d
   2.3 k ← k + 1
3. RETURN xₖ

COMPLEXITY: O(iterations × p³) for p-dimensional
CONVERGENCE: Quadratic near solution

EM Algorithm Template

ALGORITHM: Expectation-Maximization
INPUT: Data Y, model parameters θ₀, tolerance ε
OUTPUT: MLE θ̂

1. θ ← θ₀
2. REPEAT:
   2.1 E-STEP: Compute Q(θ'|θ) = E[log L(θ'|Y,Z) | Y, θ]
   2.2 M-STEP: θ_new ← argmax_θ' Q(θ'|θ)
   2.3 Δ ← |θ_new - θ|
   2.4 θ ← θ_new
3. UNTIL Δ < ε
4. RETURN θ

CONVERGENCE: Monotonic increase in likelihood
             Linear rate near optimum

Bootstrap Algorithms

Nonparametric Bootstrap

ALGORITHM: Nonparametric Bootstrap
INPUT: Data X of size n, statistic T, B (number of replicates)
OUTPUT: SE estimate, CI

1. FOR b = 1 to B:
   1.1 Draw X*_b by sampling n observations with replacement from X
   1.2 Compute T*_b = T(X*_b)
2. SE_boot ← SD({T*_1, ..., T*_B})
3. CI_percentile ← [quantile(T*, 0.025), quantile(T*, 0.975)]
4. RETURN (SE_boot, CI_percentile)

COMPLEXITY: O(B × cost(T))
NOTES: B ≥ 1000 for SE, B ≥ 10000 for percentile CI

Parametric Bootstrap

ALGORITHM: Parametric Bootstrap
INPUT: Data X, parametric model M, B replicates
OUTPUT: SE estimate

1. Fit θ̂ = MLE(X, M)
2. FOR b = 1 to B:
   2.1 Generate X*_b ~ M(θ̂)
   2.2 Compute θ̂*_b = MLE(X*_b, M)
3. SE_boot ← SD({θ̂*_1, ..., θ̂*_B})
4. RETURN SE_boot

Numerical Stability Notes

Common Issues

  1. Overflow/Underflow: Work on log scale
  2. Cancellation: Reformulate subtractions
  3. Ill-conditioning: Use regularization or pivoting
  4. Convergence: Add damping or line search

Stability Techniques

# Log-sum-exp trick
log_sum_exp <- function(x) {
  max_x <- max(x)
  max_x + log(sum(exp(x - max_x)))
}

# Numerically stable variance
stable_var <- function(x) {
  n <- length(x)
  m <- mean(x)
  sum((x - m)^2) / (n - 1)  # One-pass with correction
}

Implementation Checklist

Before Coding

  • Pseudocode written and reviewed
  • Complexity analyzed
  • Convergence conditions identified
  • Edge cases documented
  • Numerical stability considered

During Implementation

  • Match pseudocode structure
  • Add convergence monitoring
  • Handle edge cases
  • Log intermediate values (debug mode)
  • Add early stopping

After Implementation

  • Unit tests for components
  • Integration tests for full algorithm
  • Benchmark against reference implementation
  • Profile for bottlenecks
  • Document deviations from pseudocode

Key References

  • CLRS
  • Numerical Recipes

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.