agentsclimarketplace

Revise

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/16-hsantanna88-clo-author/dot-claude/skills/revise

R&R cycle — classify referee comments and route to appropriate agents. Replaces /respond-to-referee.From its SKILL.md

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill revise

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

SKILL.md

2.5 KB, 531 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Revise

Structure point-by-point referee responses with classification, agent routing per revision protocol, and diplomatic drafting.

Input: $ARGUMENTS — path to referee report file(s), optionally followed by paper path.


Workflow

Step 1: Parse Inputs

  1. Read referee report(s) from $ARGUMENTS
  2. Read the paper (paper/main.tex or specified path)
  3. Read revision protocol from rules
  4. Read existing scripts to know what analyses already exist

Step 2: Classify Every Comment

ClassRoutingAction
NEW ANALYSIS→ Coder agentFlag for user, create analysis task
CLARIFICATION→ Writer agentDraft rewritten section
REWRITE→ Writer agentDraft structural revision
DISAGREE→ User (mandatory)Draft diplomatic pushback, flag for review
MINOR→ Writer agentDraft fix directly

Step 3: Build Tracking Document

Save to quality_reports/referee_response_tracker.md with:

  • Summary counts per referee
  • Action items by priority (HIGH: new analysis, MEDIUM: clarification, FLAGGED: disagreements, LOW: minor)

Step 4: Dispatch Agents

  • CLARIFICATION/REWRITE → dispatch Writer with specific instructions
  • NEW ANALYSIS → flag for user approval before dispatching Coder
  • DISAGREE → draft diplomatic response, flag prominently for user

Step 5: Draft Response Letter

Generate LaTeX response letter with:

  • Summary of major changes
  • Point-by-point responses with exact referee quotes
  • Color-coded responses
  • Page/section references for each change

Step 6: Diplomatic Disagreement Protocol

When DISAGREE: open with acknowledgment, provide evidence, offer partial concession, NEVER say "the referee is wrong." FLAG for user review.

Step 7: Save Outputs

  1. Tracker: quality_reports/referee_response_tracker.md
  2. Response letter: quality_reports/referee_response_[journal]_[date].tex
  3. Revised sections: paper/sections/ (for CLARIFICATION/REWRITE items)

Principles

  • The response letter is the user's voice. Match their tone.
  • Never fabricate results. Mark NEW ANALYSIS items as TBD.
  • Flag all DISAGREE items. These need human judgment.
  • Track everything. Every comment appears in both tracker and response letter.

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 326,144. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.