agentsclimarketplace

Lit review

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/14-luischanci-claude-code-research-starter/dot-claude/skills/lit-review

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Install
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill lit-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

  • no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Structured literature search and synthesis with citation extraction and gap identification.

SKILL.md

1.6 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Literature Review

Conduct a structured literature search and synthesis on the given topic.

Steps

  1. Check existing materials:

    • Read master_supporting_docs/supporting_papers/ for uploaded papers
    • Read existing .bib files for already-cited works
    • Check CLAUDE.md and MEMORY.md for project context
  2. Search for literature:

    • Use WebSearch for recent publications (last 5-10 years prioritized)
    • Use WebFetch for accessible papers and abstracts
    • Search for working papers on NBER, SSRN, RePEc
  3. Organize findings into:

    • Theoretical contributions: Key models and frameworks
    • Empirical findings: Main results and methods used
    • Methodological innovations: New techniques relevant to the topic
    • Open debates: Unresolved questions and conflicting evidence
  4. Identify gaps and opportunities: What questions remain unanswered? Where could new work contribute?

  5. Extract citations in BibTeX format for relevant papers.

  6. Save report to quality_reports/lit_review_[sanitized_topic].md.

Important

  • Distinguish working papers from published papers.
  • Explicitly flag any citation you cannot verify rather than fabricating details.
  • Prioritize papers from top journals in the field.
  • Note the identification strategy used in each empirical paper.

Keep looking

Skills are one crate of 328,083. Ordering is by how many stacks a row turns up in, so the top of any crate is what has actually been picked rather than what has the most stars.