Review r

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/14-luischanci-claude-code-research-starter/dot-claude/skills/review-r

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库，覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文，并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Install

npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill review-r

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files.

SKILL.md

1.3 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Review R Code

Run a comprehensive R code review on the specified script(s). Do NOT edit any R source files -- produce a report only.

Steps

Identify target: Use $ARGUMENTS to find the R file(s). If all, scan all .R files in scripts/ and project subdirectories.
Launch r-reviewer agent following the full protocol from .claude/agents/r-reviewer.md.
Read standards from .claude/rules/r-code-conventions.md.
Check 10 categories: Structure & Header, Console Output Hygiene, Reproducibility, Function Design, Domain Correctness, Figure Quality, RDS Data Pattern, Comment Quality, Error Handling, Professional Polish.
Save report to quality_reports/[script_name]_r_review.md.
Present summary: Total issues per script, severity breakdown (Critical/High/Medium/Low), top 3 critical issues.

Important