Review paper

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/14-luischanci-claude-code-research-starter/dot-claude/skills/review-paper

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库，覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文，并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Install

npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill review-paper

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

What its author says it does

Copied from the file, not written here

Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, identification strategy, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections.

SKILL.md

1.8 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it

Review Paper

Produce a thorough referee-style review of an academic manuscript.

Steps

Identify the paper: Use $ARGUMENTS. Check master_supporting_docs/supporting_papers/ or the paper folder.
Evaluate across 6 dimensions (rate each 1-5):
- Argument Structure: Research question clarity, logical flow, evidence support, limitations acknowledged
- Identification Strategy: Causal claim credibility, identifying assumptions stated, threats discussed, robustness checks proposed
- Econometric Specification: Standard errors appropriate, functional form justified, sample selection discussed, multiple testing addressed, economic meaningfulness vs statistical significance
- Literature Positioning: Key citations present, accurate characterization, clear differentiation, missing citations identified
- Writing Quality: Clarity, tone, notation consistency, abstract quality, self-contained tables/figures
- Presentation: Table/figure design, notation consistency across sections, typos, paper length
Generate 3-5 likely referee objections with suggested responses.
Overall recommendation: Strong Accept / Accept / Revise & Resubmit / Reject.
Save report to quality_reports/paper_review_[sanitized_name].md.

Notes