Slide excellence

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/12-pedrohcgs-claude-code-my-workflow/dot-claude/skills/slide-excellence

Multi-agent slide review (visual, pedagogy, proofreading). Use for comprehensive quality check before milestones.From its SKILL.md

Install

npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill slide-excellence

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

SKILL.md

2.2 KB, 518 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Slide Excellence Review

Run a comprehensive multi-dimensional review of lecture slides. Multiple agents analyze the file independently, then results are synthesized.

Steps

1. Identify the File

Parse $ARGUMENTS for the filename. Resolve path in Quarto/ or Slides/.

2. Run Review Agents in Parallel

Agent 1: Visual Audit (slide-auditor)

Overflow, font consistency, box fatigue, spacing, images
Save: quality_reports/[FILE]_visual_audit.md

Agent 2: Pedagogical Review (pedagogy-reviewer)

13 pedagogical patterns, narrative, pacing, notation
Save: quality_reports/[FILE]_pedagogy_report.md

Agent 3: Proofreading (proofreader)

Grammar, typos, consistency, academic quality, citations
Save: quality_reports/[FILE]_report.md

Agent 4: TikZ Review (only if file contains TikZ)

Label overlaps, geometric accuracy, visual semantics
Save: quality_reports/[FILE]_tikz_review.md

Agent 5: Content Parity (only for .qmd files with corresponding .tex)

Frame count comparison, environment parity, content drift
Save: quality_reports/[FILE]_parity_report.md

Agent 6: Substance Review (optional, for .tex files)

Domain correctness via domain-reviewer protocol
Save: quality_reports/[FILE]_substance_review.md

3. Synthesize Combined Summary

# Slide Excellence Review: [Filename]

## Overall Quality Score: [EXCELLENT / GOOD / NEEDS WORK / POOR]

| Dimension | Critical | Medium | Low |
|-----------|----------|--------|-----|
| Visual/Layout | | | |
| Pedagogical | | | |
| Proofreading | | | |

### Critical Issues (Immediate Action Required)
### Medium Issues (Next Revision)
### Recommended Next Steps

Quality Score Rubric

Score	Critical	Medium	Meaning
Excellent	0-2	0-5	Ready to present
Good	3-5	6-15	Minor refinements
Needs Work	6-10	16-30	Significant revision
Poor	11+	31+	Major restructuring

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.