Pedagogy review

Skill brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills/skills/12-pedrohcgs-claude-code-my-workflow/dot-claude/skills/pedagogy-review

Run holistic pedagogical review on lecture slides. Checks narrative arc, student prerequisites, worked examples, notation clarity, and deck pacing.From its SKILL.md

Install

npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill pedagogy-review

Assembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.

One thing to look at

no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.

SKILL.md

1.2 KB, 253 tokens by cl100k_base, as published. Nobody here has run it

Pedagogical Review of Lecture Slides

Perform a comprehensive pedagogical review.

Steps

Identify the file specified in $ARGUMENTS
- If no argument, ask user which lecture to review
- If just a name, look in Quarto/ or Slides/
Launch the pedagogy-reviewer agent with the full file path
- The agent checks 13 pedagogical patterns
- Performs deck-level analysis (narrative arc, pacing, visual rhythm, notation)
- Considers student perspective (prerequisites, objections)
The agent produces a report saved to: quality_reports/[FILENAME_WITHOUT_EXT]_pedagogy_report.md
Present summary to user:
- Patterns followed vs violated (out of 13)
- Deck-level assessments
- Critical recommendations (top 3-5)

Important Notes

This is a read-only review — no files are edited
Focuses on pedagogy not visual layout (use /visual-audit for that)
For a combined review, use /slide-excellence instead

What ships with it

Read from the repository

Just SKILL.md. No reference files, no scripts.