Pedagogy review
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库，覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文，并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
npx -y skills add brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills --skill pedagogy-reviewAssembled from the repository path, not quoted from the project. Check it against their README if it does not work.
One thing to look at
- no licenseNo license file was found in the repository. Code published without one is not open source by default, so using it at work is a question for whoever answers licensing questions where you are.
What its author says it does
Copied from the file, not written here
Run holistic pedagogical review on lecture slides. Checks narrative arc, student prerequisites, worked examples, notation clarity, and deck pacing.
SKILL.md
1.2 KB, as published. Nobody here has run it
Pedagogical Review of Lecture Slides
Perform a comprehensive pedagogical review.
Steps
-
Identify the file specified in
$ARGUMENTS- If no argument, ask user which lecture to review
- If just a name, look in
Quarto/orSlides/
-
Launch the pedagogy-reviewer agent with the full file path
- The agent checks 13 pedagogical patterns
- Performs deck-level analysis (narrative arc, pacing, visual rhythm, notation)
- Considers student perspective (prerequisites, objections)
-
The agent produces a report saved to:
quality_reports/[FILENAME_WITHOUT_EXT]_pedagogy_report.md -
Present summary to user:
- Patterns followed vs violated (out of 13)
- Deck-level assessments
- Critical recommendations (top 3-5)
Important Notes
- This is a read-only review — no files are edited
- Focuses on pedagogy not visual layout (use
/visual-auditfor that) - For a combined review, use
/slide-excellenceinstead