Debug

Debug

Relies on BDK foundation (STARTUP_INSTRUCTIONS.md) for project context and MCP tool preference.

Diagnose bugs via structured investigation, reproduce with failing tests, then fix or plan.

Announce at start: "Using debug to investigate the issue."

Core principle: Understand first → test second → confirm with user → fix third.

On start: create tasks for phases 1–4 only via TaskCreate:

• Phase 1: Parse Input
• Phase 2: Investigate
• Phase 3: Write Failing Tests
• Phase 4: Propose & Wait for User Decision ← HARD STOP

Mark each task complete (TaskUpdate) only when phase fully done. Never mark Phase 4 complete until user responded.

After user responds to Phase 4: create Phase 5 task (TaskCreate) for chosen path — "Fix Inline" or "Hand Off to /bdk:create-plan" — then proceed.

---

Decision Flow

digraph debug_flow {
    rankdir=TB
    node [shape=box, style="rounded,filled", fillcolor="#f0f0f0"]

    start [label="Phase 1\nParse Input", fillcolor="#d4edda"]
    investigate [label="Phase 2\nInvestigate"]
    tests [label="Phase 3\nWrite Failing Tests"]
    decide [label="Phase 4\nPropose & ASK USER\n(HARD STOP)", fillcolor="#fff3cd", shape=octagon]
    fix [label="Phase 5a\nFix Inline + Verify"]
    plan [label="Phase 5b\nHand off to /bdk:create-plan"]
    done [label="Done", fillcolor="#d4edda", shape=doublecircle]

    start -> investigate
    investigate -> tests
    tests -> decide
    decide -> fix [label="user: 'Fix now'"]
    decide -> plan [label="user: 'Create plan'"]
    decide -> investigate [label="user: 'Something else'"]
    fix -> done
    plan -> done
}

---

The 5-Phase Workflow

Phase 1: Parse Input

1. Validate input: If empty or vague, ask inline for details, then stop
2. Extract key signals: error type, failing component, steps to reproduce, expected vs actual
3. Print summary:

   [debug] Issue: {one-line summary}
   [debug] Signals: error={exception class or "none"}, component={file/class or "unknown"}
   

GATE: Must have enough signal to start investigation.

---

Phase 2: Investigate

Inject available search tools:

!python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/inject.py --chain ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/fragments/tool-tiers/search.chain.json

Using the search tools above:

1. Find entry point — locate the error component or symbol
2. Trace callers — trace up the call chain
3. Trace callees — trace down to dependencies
4. Identify impacted paths — named execution paths through the suspected area
5. Flag cascading risk — highest-risk choke points in the affected module
6. Identify root cause
7. Quantify blast radius — understand scope before proposing fix:

!python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/inject.py --chain ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/fragments/tool-tiers/impact.chain.json 8. Scan for related test gaps — same class of problem in nearby code only 9. Print investigation summary:

[debug] Root cause: {one sentence}
[debug] Affected: {file path}:{line range}
[debug] Test gaps found: {N}

GATE: Must identify root cause before Phase 3.

---

Phase 3: Write Failing Tests

Write tests that precisely reproduce bug. Tests RED until fix applied.

Rules:

• Each test concrete: specific input values, specific expected outcome
• Follow project test conventions (check existing tests for patterns)
• Place tests in correct existing test file

Inject test command: !python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/get_settings.py test-tools

Delegate to test-runner subagent using injected command above (fall back to detecting from project context if unavailable) to confirm all new tests RED.

Subsequent test runs in this debug session (Phase 5 GREEN check, regression sweep) should reuse the same test-runner via SendMessage(to: "<agentId>", ...) instead of fresh spawns — the runner keeps the project's test command resolved. See STARTUP "Continuing a Spawned Agent".

[debug] Failing tests confirmed: {N} red

GATE: All new tests must be RED before proceeding.

---

Phase 4: Propose Solution & Ask User (HARD STOP)

Mandatory checkpoint. STOP and wait for user decision.

Step 1: Describe proposed solution (what changes, why it fixes root cause, risks)

Step 2: Assess complexity:

• LOW (inline fix): isolated change affecting one function/call site
• HIGH (route to /bdk:create-plan): affects many call sites, introduces new abstractions, changes shared data models

Step 3: Ask user via AskUserQuestion:

## Proposed Fix
{solution summary}

## Complexity: {LOW or HIGH}
{justification}

## What would you like to do?
1. **Fix now** — apply the inline fix and verify tests pass
2. **Create plan** — hand off to `/bdk:create-plan` with failing tests as acceptance criteria
3. **Something else** — redirect, reconsider, investigate more

{recommendation}

AskUserQuestion MUST be last tool call in this phase.

HARD STOP: After calling AskUserQuestion, output NO text, call NO tools, take NO action. Turn ends here. Phase 4 task stays open. Phase 5 does not start until user replies.

GATE: User explicitly chose option. Only then: mark Phase 4 complete, begin Phase 5.

---

Phase 5a: Fix Inline

Inject project tools context:

• Test tools: !python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/get_settings.py test-tools
• Lint tools: !python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/get_settings.py lint-tools

1. Apply minimal fix
2. Delegate to test-runner — run only new failing tests using injected test command
3. Confirm all tests GREEN
4. Delegate to static-analyse — run lint/type-check using injected lint command
5. Fix any issues
6. Print final summary:

   [debug] Done.
     Root cause:   {one sentence}
     Tests added:  {N}
     Fix applied:  {brief description}
     Status:       all tests GREEN
   

---

Phase 5b: Hand Off to /bdk:create-plan

1. Print: [debug] Routing to /bdk:create-plan
2. Invoke /bdk:create-plan passing:
   • Root cause as feature description
   • Steps to reproduce (verbatim)
   • Failing test file path and test names as acceptance criteria
   • Architectural constraints discovered during investigation

---

Key Principles

• Investigate before testing — understand first
• Tests define bug — failing test is contract
• Phase 4 is hard stop — ALWAYS wait for user decision
• Inline questions for info, AskUserQuestion for decisions
• Minimal fix — change only what failing tests require
• NEVER hardcode test or lint commands — detect from project context

Anti-Patterns

• NEVER fix before writing failing test
• NEVER proceed past Phase 4 without user confirmation
• NEVER route to /bdk:create-plan without passing failing test paths
• NEVER scan entire codebase for gaps — only code already read
• NEVER call any tool after AskUserQuestion in Phase 4 — turn ends there
• NEVER mark Phase 4 task complete before user responds
• NEVER start Phase 5 without first creating Phase 5 task and Phase 4 marked complete